In Apache HTTP Server versions 2.4.0 to 2.4.46 a specially crafted SessionHeader sent by an origin server could cause a heap overflow
CVE-2021-26691
“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.
Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2022-05-24. NVD baseline CVSS 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.
- 585 internet-facing services (distinct ip:port) on record running an affected version — derived from Shodan data (© Shodan); a patched service can stay counted while its port stays open
- High exploitation likelihood — EPSS 68%
A fix is available — apply it.
585 internet-facing services (distinct ip:port) on record running a version that maps to CVE-2021-26691, in our KEV-Exposure radar’s Shodan-derived sample.
How it counts: every 12 hours, when Shodan query credits allow, the radar runs one Shodan query per tracked product, reads up to 100 ip:port services per query, and keeps a service when its banner version matches a CISA-KEV or high-EPSS CVE; a service is dropped when neither a search nor a Shodan InternetDB port re-check has refreshed it for 21 days. A re-check that finds the port still listed by Shodan InternetDB refreshes the service without re-reading the banner, so a patched service can stay counted while its port stays open. A count is a banner-version inference over a sample, not an exploit test and not an internet-wide census, and the unit is a service, not a machine: a machine answering on two ports counts twice.
- CVSS v3
- 9.8
- EG Score
- 9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 71EG Risk 71/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity98% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation68% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 68%
- EPSS %ILE
- 99th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 68% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-22). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
June 10, 2021
Last Modified
November 21, 2024
Advisory Details (10)
Auto-updated Oct 4, 2026Apache: Multiple vulnerabilities (GLSA 202107-38) — Gentoo security
https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202107-38[SECURITY] Fedora 35 Update: httpd-2.4.49-1.fc35 - package-announce - Fedora mailing-lists
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ZNCYSR3BXT36FFF4XTCPL3HDQK4VP45R/[SECURITY] Fedora 34 Update: httpd-2.4.49-1.fc34 - package-announce - Fedora mailing-lists
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/SPBR6WUYBJNACHKE65SPL7TJOHX7RHWD/[SECURITY] [DLA 2706-1] apache2 security update
https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/07/msg00006.htmlPony Mail
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/re026d3da9d7824bd93b9f871c0fdda978d960c7e62d8c43cba8d0bf3%40%3Ccvs.httpd.apache.org%3EPony Mail
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r7f2b70b621651548f4b6f027552f1dd91705d7111bb5d15cda0a68dd%40%3Cdev.httpd.apache.org%3EPony Mail
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r50cae1b71f1e7421069036b213c26da7d8f47dd59874e3bd956959fe%40%3Cannounce.httpd.apache.org%3Eoss-security - CVE-2021-26691: Apache httpd: mod_session response handling heap overflow
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/06/10/7Apache HTTP Server 2.4 vulnerabilities - The Apache HTTP Server Project
http://httpd.apache.org/security/vulnerabilities_24.htmlVendor Advisories for CVE-2021-26691(5)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- RHSA-2022:0143Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: httpd security update
- RHSA-2021:4614Red Hat Product SecurityMedium
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat JBoss Core Services Apache HTTP Server 2.4.37 SP10 security update
- RHSA-2021:4613Red Hat Product SecurityMedium
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat JBoss Core Services Apache HTTP Server 2.4.37 SP10 security update
- RHSA-2021:3816Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: httpd:2.4 security update
- CVE-2021-26691Microsoft Security Response Center (MSRC)Critical
Apache HTTP Server mod_session response handling heap overflow
Patch Availability(6)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| ubuntu | apache2-bin (2.4.46-4ubuntu1.1) @ hirsute | 2026-10-21 | ubuntu |
| ubuntu | apache2-utils (2.4.18-2ubuntu3.17+esm1) @ xenial | 2026-10-21 | ubuntu |
| redhat | httpd-0:2.4.6-97.el7_9.4 | 2022-01-17 | redhat |
| redhat | jbcs-httpd24-openssl-pkcs11-0:0.4.10-22.jbcs.el7 | 2021-11-10 | redhat |
| redhat | httpd | 2021-11-10 | redhat |
| redhat | httpd:2.4-8040020211008164252.522a0ee4 | 2021-10-12 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(21 across 21 ecosystems)
Alpine:v3.10(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| apache2 | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.11(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| apache2 | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| apache2 | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| apache2 | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| apache2 | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.15(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| apache2 | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.16(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| apache2 | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.17(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| apache2 | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.18(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| apache2 | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.19(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| apache2 | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.20(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| apache2 | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.21(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| apache2 | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.22(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| apache2 | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.23(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| apache2 | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.24(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| apache2 | — |
| — |
Debian:10(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| apache2 | 2.4.38-3, 2.4.38-3+deb10u1, 2.4.38-3+deb10u2, 2.4.38-3+deb10u3, 2.4.38-3+deb10u4 |
| — |
Debian:11(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| apache2 | — |
| — |
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| apache2 | — |
| — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| apache2 | — |
| — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| apache2 | — |
| — |
Debian:9(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| apache2 | 2.4.25-3 ... 2.4.25-3+deb9u9 (10 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Additional Vendor Advisories
(2)
Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 26× in last 7d / 54× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 93 of 177 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 7 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 84 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-23 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-23 00:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-23 00:43 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-23 00:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j3ww-p97m-gh9x · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-22 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-22 01:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-22 01:23 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-22 01:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j3ww-p97m-gh9x · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-21 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-21 02:05 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-21 02:05 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-21 02:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j3ww-p97m-gh9x · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-20 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-20 02:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-20 02:47 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-20 02:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j3ww-p97m-gh9x · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-19 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-19 02:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-19 02:36 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-19 02:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j3ww-p97m-gh9x · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-18 03:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-18 03:17 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-18 03:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j3ww-p97m-gh9x · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-17 03:57 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 03:57 UTCVendor advisory
Show 68 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-17 03:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j3ww-p97m-gh9x · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-16 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-16 04:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-16 04:37 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-16 04:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j3ww-p97m-gh9x · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-15 03:04 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-15 03:04 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-15 03:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j3ww-p97m-gh9x · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-14 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-13 23:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-13 23:15 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-13 23:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j3ww-p97m-gh9x · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-13 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-12 19:21 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-12 19:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j3ww-p97m-gh9x · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-12 19:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 23:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-10 19:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:25 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-10-09 20:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-02 16:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-30 15:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 13:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-24 14:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-23 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-21 20:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-20 04:05 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-19 15:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-18 19:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-17 19:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-16 14:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-15 03:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-12 14:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-11 09:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-08 21:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-05 15:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-04 13:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-04 05:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-02 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-01 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-01 07:23 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-30 19:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-28 21:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-26 14:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-25 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-24 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-23 00:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-21 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-19 17:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-16 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-16 02:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-15 06:37 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-15 01:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-12 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-11 13:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-07 16:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-06 13:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-04 10:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-01 04:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-30 18:50 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-07-30 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-30 01:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownDebian:10:apache2
- CVE-2019-10082EG 9.1EPSS p97CRITICAL
- CVE-2019-10092NVD 6.1EG 8.8EPSS p100HIGH
- CVE-2021-26690NVD 7.5EG 8.5EPSS p99HIGH
- CVE-2019-10098NVD 6.1EG 8.4EPSS p99HIGH
- CVE-2021-31618NVD 7.5EG 8.1EPSS p99HIGH
- CVE-2020-35452NVD 7.3EG 8.1EPSS p99HIGH
- CVE-2020-1927NVD 6.1EG 7.5EPSS p99HIGH
- CVE-2019-10081EG 7.5EPSS p97HIGH
- CVE-2019-9517EG 7.5EPSS p98HIGH
- CVE-2021-30641NVD 5.3EG 6.8EPSS p99MEDIUM
Same vendor
10 shownredhat:RHSA-2021:4613
- CVE-2021-26690NVD 7.5EG 8.5EPSS p99HIGH
- CVE-2020-35452NVD 7.3EG 8.1EPSS p99HIGH
- CVE-2021-30641NVD 5.3EG 6.8EPSS p99MEDIUM
- CVE-2021-34798NVD 7.5EG 8.4EPSS p99HIGH
- CVE-2020-13950NVD 7.5EG 8.0EPSS p99HIGH
- CVE-2021-3688NVD 4.8EG 9.1CRITICAL
- CVE-2021-23840NVD 7.5EG 8.1EPSS p99HIGH
- CVE-2021-3712NVD 7.4EG 8.0EPSS p99HIGH
- CVE-2019-20838EG 7.5HIGH
- CVE-2019-17567NVD 5.3EG 7.3EPSS p99HIGH
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2021-26691?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2021-26691 published?
Is CVE-2021-26691 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2021-26691?
How do I remediate CVE-2021-26691?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2021-26691
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2021-26691?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.