A vulnerability in the Cisco Discovery Protocol implementation for the Cisco IP Phone could allow an unauthenticated, adjacent attacker to remotely execute code with root privileges or cause a reload of an affected IP phone. The vulnerability is due to missing checks when processing Cisco Discovery Protocol messages. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted Cisco Discovery Protocol packet to the targeted IP phone. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to remotely execute code with root privileges or cause a reload of an affected IP phone, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. Cisco Discovery Protocol is a Layer 2 protocol. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must be in the same broadcast domain as the affected device (Layer 2 adjacent).
CVE-2020-3111
“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.
This high-severity CVE scores 8.8 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 3.1% (87th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
No fix has been recorded since the CVE record was published in 2020 — use a compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and check the vendor's advisory.
The CVE record's CNA (Cisco Systems, Inc.) lists Cisco IP phone versions before 12.7(1) as affected. No release containing a fix is confirmed on record.
- CVSS v3
- 8.8
- EG Score
- 8.8HIGHmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 41EG Risk 41/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity88% × 45%The EG Score, 8.8 of 10.Exploitation3.1% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: No fix has been recorded since the CVE record was published in 2020. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines, and check the vendor's advisory for a fix. - EPSS PROB
- 3.1%
- EPSS %ILE
- 87th
- KEV
- Not listed
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
No fix has been recorded since the CVE record was published in 2020. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines, and check the vendor's advisory for a fix.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
February 5, 2020
Last Modified
November 21, 2024
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Aug 9, 2026Cisco IP Phone Remote Code Execution and Denial of Service Vulnerability
https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20200205-voip-phones-rce-dosLocked Out | Packet Storm
http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/156203/Cisco-Discovery-Protocol-CDP-Remote-Device-Takeover.htmlWeakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 27× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 88 of 150 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 12 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 62 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-15 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 87th percentile
- 2026-10-14 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 87th percentile
- 2026-10-13 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 87th percentile
- 2026-10-12 19:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 87th percentile
- 2026-10-12 00:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 87th percentile
- 2026-10-10 19:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 87th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 87th percentile
- 2026-10-08 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 87th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 87th percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 87th percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 87th percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 87th percentile
- 2026-09-30 15:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 14:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 87th percentile
- 2026-09-29 15:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 87th percentile
- 2026-09-27 13:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 87th percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 87th percentile
- 2026-09-24 14:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 87th percentile
- 2026-09-22 14:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 87th percentile
- 2026-09-21 20:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 87th percentile
- 2026-09-20 20:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 87th percentile
- 2026-09-19 15:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 87th percentile
- 2026-09-18 19:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 87th percentile
Show 63 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-17 19:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 87th percentile
- 2026-09-16 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 87th percentile
- 2026-09-15 03:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 87th percentile
- 2026-09-13 16:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 86th percentile
- 2026-09-12 14:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 86th percentile
- 2026-09-11 09:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 86th percentile
- 2026-09-08 21:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 86th percentile
- 2026-09-07 15:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 86th percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 86th percentile
- 2026-09-05 15:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 86th percentile
- 2026-09-04 13:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 86th percentile
- 2026-09-04 05:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 86th percentile
- 2026-09-02 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 86th percentile
- 2026-09-01 03:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 86th percentile
- 2026-08-30 19:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 86th percentile
- 2026-08-30 01:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 86th percentile
- 2026-08-27 14:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 86th percentile
- 2026-08-26 14:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 86th percentile
- 2026-08-25 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 86th percentile
- 2026-08-21 23:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 86th percentile
- 2026-08-20 22:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 86th percentile
- 2026-08-19 17:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 86th percentile
- 2026-08-18 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 86th percentile
- 2026-08-17 13:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 86th percentile
- 2026-08-16 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 86th percentile
- 2026-08-16 02:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 86th percentile
- 2026-08-15 01:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 86th percentile
- 2026-08-13 21:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 86th percentile
- 2026-08-12 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 86th percentile
- 2026-08-09 13:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 86th percentile
- 2026-08-08 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 86th percentile
- 2026-08-07 16:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 86th percentile
- 2026-08-06 13:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 86th percentile
- 2026-08-04 15:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 86th percentile
- 2026-08-04 10:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 86th percentile
- 2026-08-02 02:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 86th percentile
- 2026-08-01 04:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 86th percentile
- 2026-07-30 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 86th percentile
- 2026-07-30 01:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 86th percentile
- 2026-07-28 15:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 86th percentile
- 2026-07-26 14:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 86th percentile
- 2026-07-25 14:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 86th percentile
- 2026-07-24 14:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 86th percentile
- 2026-07-23 14:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 86th percentile
- 2026-07-23 01:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 22:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 14:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 86th percentile
- 2026-07-21 15:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 86th percentile
- 2026-07-20 17:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 86th percentile
- 2026-07-19 14:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 86th percentile
- 2026-07-19 02:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 86th percentile
- 2026-07-16 16:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 86th percentile
- 2026-07-15 16:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 86th percentile
- 2026-07-15 01:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 86th percentile
- 2026-07-13 22:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 86th percentile
- 2026-07-13 06:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 86th percentile
- 2026-07-12 05:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 86th percentile
- 2026-07-11 08:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 86th percentile
- 2026-07-09 19:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 86th percentile
- 2026-07-08 15:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 86th percentile
- 2026-07-07 13:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 86th percentile
- 2026-07-06 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 86th percentile
- 2026-07-06 02:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 86th percentile
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2020-3111?
When was CVE-2020-3111 made public?
Is CVE-2020-3111 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2020-3111?
How do I remediate CVE-2020-3111?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2020-3111
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2020-3111?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.