The X.509 GeneralName type is a generic type for representing different types of names. One of those name types is known as EDIPartyName. OpenSSL provides a function GENERAL_NAME_cmp which compares different instances of a GENERAL_NAME to see if they are equal or not. This function behaves incorrectly when both GENERAL_NAMEs contain an EDIPARTYNAME. A NULL pointer dereference and a crash may occur leading to a possible denial of service attack. OpenSSL itself uses the GENERAL_NAME_cmp function for two purposes: 1) Comparing CRL distribution point names between an available CRL and a CRL distribution point embedded in an X509 certificate 2) When verifying that a timestamp response token signer matches the timestamp authority name (exposed via the API functions TS_RESP_verify_response and TS_RESP_verify_token) If an attacker can control both items being compared then that attacker could trigger a crash. For example if the attacker can trick a client or server into checking a malicious certificate against a malicious CRL then this may occur. Note that some applications automatically download CRLs based on a URL embedded in a certificate. This checking happens prior to the signatures on the certificate and CRL being verified. OpenSSL's s_server, s_client and verify tools have support for the "-crl_download" option which implements automatic CRL downloading and this attack has been demonstrated to work against those tools. Note that an unrelated bug means that affected versions of OpenSSL cannot parse or construct correct encodings of EDIPARTYNAME. However it is possible to construct a malformed EDIPARTYNAME that OpenSSL's parser will accept and hence trigger this attack. All OpenSSL 1.1.1 and 1.0.2 versions are affected by this issue. Other OpenSSL releases are out of support and have not been checked. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1i (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1h). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2x (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2w).
CVE-2020-1971
Score 5.9 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2022-05-24. NVD baseline CVSS 5.9; sources differ by 0.0.
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 5.9
- EG Score
- 5.9(medium)
- EG Risk
- 43(Track)EG Risk 43/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity59% × 45%Exploitation40% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS
- 93.4%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
December 8, 2020
Last Modified
May 29, 2026
References (52)
- openssl-security@opensslhttp://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/09/14/2
- openssl-security@opensslhttps://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-389290.pdf
- openssl-security@opensslhttps://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=2154ab83e14ede338d2ede9bbe5cdfce5d5a6c9e
- openssl-security@opensslhttps://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=f960d81215ebf3f65e03d4d5d857fb9b666d6920
- openssl-security@opensslhttps://kb.pulsesecure.net/articles/Pulse_Security_Advisories/SA44676
- openssl-security@opensslhttps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r63c6f2dd363d9b514d0a4bcf624580616a679898cc14c109a49b750c%40%3Cdev.tomcat.apache.org%3E
- openssl-security@opensslhttps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rbb769f771711fb274e0a4acb1b5911c8aab544a6ac5e8c12d40c5143%40%3Ccommits.pulsar.apache.org%3E
- openssl-security@opensslhttps://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/12/msg00020.html
- openssl-security@opensslhttps://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/12/msg00021.html
- openssl-security@opensslhttps://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/DGSI34Y5LQ5RYXN4M2I5ZQT65LFVDOUU/
- openssl-security@opensslhttps://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/PWPSSZNZOBJU2YR6Z4TGHXKYW3YP5QG7/
- openssl-security@opensslhttps://security.FreeBSD.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-20:33.openssl.asc
- openssl-security@opensslhttps://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202012-13
- openssl-security@opensslhttps://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20201218-0005/
- openssl-security@opensslhttps://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210513-0002/
Vendor Advisories for CVE-2020-1971(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Patch Availability(18)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fixed in / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| ubuntu | libssl1.0.0-udeb (1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.27+esm2) @ trusty | 2026-05-23 | ubuntu |
| ubuntu | openssl (1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.18) @ xenial | 2026-05-23 | ubuntu |
| redhat | openshiftdo/odo-init-image-rhel7:1.1.3-2 | 2021-03-22 | redhat |
| redhat | tomcat-native-0:1.2.23-23.redhat_23.ep7.el7 | 2021-02-11 | redhat |
| redhat | openssl | 2021-02-11 | redhat |
| redhat | jbcs-httpd24-openssl-pkcs11-0:0.4.10-18.jbcs.el7 | 2021-02-11 | redhat |
| redhat | jws5-tomcat-native-0:1.2.25-3.redhat_3.el8jws | 2021-02-11 | redhat |
| redhat | openssl-0:1.0.1e-59.el6_10 | 2021-01-11 | redhat |
| redhat | openssl-1:1.0.1e-52.el7_2 | 2020-12-21 | redhat |
| redhat | openssl-1:1.0.1e-61.el7_3 | 2020-12-21 | redhat |
| redhat | openssl-1:1.1.1c-3.el8_1 | 2020-12-21 | redhat |
| redhat | openssl-1:1.0.2k-17.el7_6 | 2020-12-21 | redhat |
| redhat | openssl-1:1.0.2k-9.el7_4 | 2020-12-21 | redhat |
| redhat | openssl-1:1.0.2k-20.el7_7 | 2020-12-17 | redhat |
| redhat | openssl-1:1.1.1-9.el8_0 | 2020-12-16 | redhat |
| redhat | openssl-1:1.0.2k-21.el7_9 | 2020-12-16 | redhat |
| redhat | openssl-1:1.1.1g-12.el8_3 | 2020-12-15 | redhat |
| redhat | openssl-1:1.1.1c-16.el8_2 | 2020-12-15 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Additional Vendor Advisories
(20)
Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.
- Microsoft MSRCCVE-2020-19712021-10-12
OpenSSL: CVE-2020-1971 EDIPARTYNAME NULL pointer de-reference
- Red HatRHSA-2020:5422IMPORTANT2020-12-08
RHSA-2020:5422 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2020:5476IMPORTANT2020-12-08
RHSA-2020:5476 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2020:5566IMPORTANT2020-12-08
RHSA-2020:5566 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2020:5588IMPORTANT2020-12-08
RHSA-2020:5588 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2020:5623IMPORTANT2020-12-08
RHSA-2020:5623 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2020:5637IMPORTANT2020-12-08
RHSA-2020:5637 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2020:5639IMPORTANT2020-12-08
RHSA-2020:5639 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2020:5640IMPORTANT2020-12-08
RHSA-2020:5640 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2020:5641IMPORTANT2020-12-08
RHSA-2020:5641 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2020:5642IMPORTANT2020-12-08
RHSA-2020:5642 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2021:0056IMPORTANT2020-12-08
RHSA-2021:0056 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2021:0486IMPORTANT2020-12-08
RHSA-2021:0486 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2021:0488IMPORTANT2020-12-08
RHSA-2021:0488 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2021:0489IMPORTANT2020-12-08
RHSA-2021:0489 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2021:0491IMPORTANT2020-12-08
RHSA-2021:0491 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2021:0494IMPORTANT2020-12-08
RHSA-2021:0494 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2021:0495IMPORTANT2020-12-08
RHSA-2021:0495 — Important
- UbuntuUSN-4662-1HIGH
OpenSSL vulnerability
- UbuntuUSN-4745-1HIGH
OpenSSL vulnerabilities
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 12× in last 7d / 45× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-07-23 01:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 22:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-21 15:22 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-21 15:22 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-20 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-20 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-19 14:28 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-19 02:26 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-19 02:26 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-18 10:02 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-16 16:59 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-15 16:55 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-15 01:57 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-13 22:27 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-13 22:27 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-13 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-13 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-12 22:08 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-07-12 05:44 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-11 08:25 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-11 08:25 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-09 19:07 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-08 15:12 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-07 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 70 moreShow fewer
- 2026-07-07 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-06 16:25 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-06 16:25 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-06 02:21 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-06 02:21 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-05 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-04 06:29 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-04 06:28 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-01 15:03 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-30 23:20 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-30 23:20 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-28 04:54 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-28 04:54 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-27 03:06 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-25 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-24 14:03 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-24 14:03 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-24 07:59 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-22 14:23 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-22 14:23 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-21 01:57 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-21 01:57 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-18 17:50 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-17 17:50 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-16 17:50 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-16 17:50 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-15 17:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-14 23:15 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-13 22:58 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-13 22:58 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-12 23:10 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-11 13:58 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-10 22:16 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-10 22:16 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-10 13:20 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-08 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-08 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-07 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-07 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-07 11:59 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-06-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-05 22:45 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-05 22:45 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-05 06:08 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-05 06:08 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-04 13:10 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-04 13:10 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-02 20:11 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-02 20:11 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-01 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-01 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-31 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-31 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-31 00:15 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-31 00:15 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-29 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-28 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-28 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-27 13:39 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-26 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-26 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-26 07:17 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-26 07:17 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-24 16:48 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-23 04:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-05-23 04:38 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-05-23 04:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
Publicly available exploits
(1 reference)Working exploit code is in the public domain (1 GitHub PoC). Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly — public PoCs typically lead to mass-exploitation within 24-72 hours.
- GitHub PoCMBHudson/CVE-2020-1971First seen Dec 9, 2020
CVE-2020-1971 Auto Scan & Remote Exploit Script. Auto Local Scan & Patch Script.
Open source ↗
Related CVEs(same vendor + same CWE)
Same vendor
10 shownmsrc · redhat
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2020-1971?
When was CVE-2020-1971 disclosed?
Is CVE-2020-1971 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2020-1971?
How do I remediate CVE-2020-1971?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2020-1971
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2020-1971?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.