CVE-2019-19391

CRITICALNVD 9.19.1
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 9.1 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: MODERATE) published 2022-05-24. NVD baseline CVSS 9.1; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — 5 sources updated this week

Also known asEUVD-2019-9012 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-756f-h55r-pvqq (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.1EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 1.4%CVSS: 9.1Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In LuaJIT through 2.0.5, as used in Moonjit before 2.1.2 and other products, debug.getinfo has a type confusion issue that leads to arbitrary memory write or read operations, because certain cases involving valid stack levels and > options are mishandled. NOTE: The LuaJIT project owner states that the debug libary is unsafe by definition and that this is not a vulnerability. When LuaJIT was originally developed, the expectation was that the entire debug library had no security guarantees and thus it made no sense to assign CVEs. However, not all users of later LuaJIT derivatives share this perspective

CVSS v3
9.1
EG Score
9.1CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
42
EG Risk 42/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity91% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.1 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation1.4% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
1.4%
EPSS %ILE
72nd
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.1): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.1 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.1 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
1.4% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-03). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

November 29, 2019

Last Modified

November 3, 2025

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Aug 1, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github_pr.
Web pageMentions a patch (unverified)

[SECURITY] [DLA 4283-1] luajit security update

https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/08/msg00022.html
GitHub pull request

debug.getinfo arbitrary memory read/write

Upstream fix in progress (PR #526 · LuaJIT/LuaJIT, state=closed)

https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/pull/526

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
luajit2.1.0~beta3+dfsg-5.3
  • every version up to 2.1.0~beta3+dfsg-5.3+deb11u1: fixed in 2.1.0~beta3+dfsg-5.3+deb11u1
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
luajit—
  • every version up to 2.1.0~beta3+git20210112+dfsg-2: fixed in 2.1.0~beta3+git20210112+dfsg-2
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
luajit—
  • every version up to 2.1.0~beta3+git20210112+dfsg-2: fixed in 2.1.0~beta3+git20210112+dfsg-2
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
luajit—
  • every version up to 2.1.0~beta3+git20210112+dfsg-2: fixed in 2.1.0~beta3+git20210112+dfsg-2
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 27× in last 7d / 87× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 99 of 245 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 1 repeat row among the latest 100 is merged into the row it repeats. The 146 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-03 19:43 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-11-03 19:43 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-03 19:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-756f-h55r-pvqq · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  4. 2026-11-03 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
  5. 2026-11-03 04:25 UTCOSV refresh
  6. 2026-11-02 19:21 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-11-02 19:21 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-11-02 19:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-756f-h55r-pvqq · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  9. 2026-11-02 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
  10. 2026-11-01 18:52 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-11-01 18:52 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-11-01 18:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-756f-h55r-pvqq · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  13. 2026-10-31 18:31 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-31 18:31 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-10-31 18:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-756f-h55r-pvqq · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  16. 2026-10-31 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
  17. 2026-10-30 18:01 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-30 18:01 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-10-30 18:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-756f-h55r-pvqq · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  20. 2026-10-30 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
  21. 2026-10-29 17:40 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-29 17:40 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-10-29 17:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-756f-h55r-pvqq · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  24. 2026-10-29 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
  25. 2026-10-28 17:18 UTCEG score recompute
Show 74 more
  1. 2026-10-28 17:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-756f-h55r-pvqq · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  2. 2026-10-28 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
  3. 2026-10-27 16:54 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-27 16:54 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-10-27 16:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-756f-h55r-pvqq · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  6. 2026-10-27 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
  7. 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-756f-h55r-pvqq · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  9. 2026-10-26 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
  10. 2026-10-25 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
  11. 2026-10-25 15:56 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-25 15:56 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-10-25 15:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-756f-h55r-pvqq · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  14. 2026-10-24 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
  15. 2026-10-24 15:31 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-24 15:31 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-10-24 15:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-756f-h55r-pvqq · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  18. 2026-10-23 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
  19. 2026-10-23 15:05 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-23 15:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-756f-h55r-pvqq · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  21. 2026-10-22 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
  22. 2026-10-22 14:38 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-22 14:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-756f-h55r-pvqq · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  24. 2026-10-21 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
  25. 2026-10-21 14:16 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-10-21 14:16 UTCVendor advisory
  27. 2026-10-21 14:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-756f-h55r-pvqq · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  28. 2026-10-20 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
  29. 2026-10-20 13:46 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-10-20 13:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-756f-h55r-pvqq · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  31. 2026-10-19 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 71st percentile
  32. 2026-10-19 12:57 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-10-19 12:57 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-10-19 12:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-756f-h55r-pvqq · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  35. 2026-10-18 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 71st percentile
  36. 2026-10-18 11:43 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-10-18 11:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-756f-h55r-pvqq · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  38. 2026-10-18 09:49 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-10-17 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 71st percentile
  40. 2026-10-17 10:45 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-10-17 10:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-756f-h55r-pvqq · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  42. 2026-10-16 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 71st percentile
  43. 2026-10-16 10:22 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-10-16 10:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-756f-h55r-pvqq · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  45. 2026-10-15 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 71st percentile
  46. 2026-10-15 09:58 UTCEG score recompute
  47. 2026-10-15 09:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-756f-h55r-pvqq · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  48. 2026-10-14 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 71st percentile
  49. 2026-10-14 06:09 UTCEG score recompute
  50. 2026-10-14 06:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-756f-h55r-pvqq · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  51. 2026-10-13 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 71st percentile
  52. 2026-10-13 01:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-756f-h55r-pvqq · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  53. 2026-10-12 19:57 UTCEG score recompute
  54. 2026-10-12 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 71st percentile
  55. 2026-10-12 00:21 UTCEG score recompute
  56. 2026-10-11 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 71st percentile
  57. 2026-10-10 19:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 71st percentile
  58. 2026-10-09 20:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 71st percentile
  59. 2026-10-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 71st percentile
  60. 2026-10-07 23:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 71st percentile
  61. 2026-10-06 15:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 71st percentile
  62. 2026-10-05 17:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 71st percentile
  63. 2026-10-03 14:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 71st percentile
  64. 2026-09-30 14:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 70th percentile
  65. 2026-09-30 10:15 UTCEG score recompute
  66. 2026-09-28 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 70th percentile
  67. 2026-09-27 14:37 UTCOSV refresh
  68. 2026-09-27 13:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 70th percentile
  69. 2026-09-26 15:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 70th percentile
  70. 2026-09-26 00:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 70th percentile
  71. 2026-09-24 13:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 70th percentile
  72. 2026-09-23 13:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 70th percentile
  73. 2026-09-22 14:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 70th percentile
  74. 2026-09-21 20:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 69th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2019-19391?
CVE-2019-19391 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on November 29, 2019. In LuaJIT through 2.0.5, as used in Moonjit before 2.1.2 and other products, debug.getinfo has a type confusion issue that leads to arbitrary memory write or read operations, because certain cases involving valid stack levels and > options are mishandled. NOTE: The LuaJIT project owner states that…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2019-19391 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2019-19391 was published on November 29, 2019. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 3, 2025; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2019-19391 actively exploited?
CVE-2019-19391 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 1.4% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (72nd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2019-19391?
CVE-2019-19391 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.1 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2019-19391?
A fix for CVE-2019-19391 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2019-19391 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2019-19391

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2019-19391?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.