CVE-2019-19012

CRITICALNVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

This critical-severity CVE scores 9.8 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 11% (95th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from NVD CVSS v3
Sources: EPSS, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — 4 sources updated this weekElevated
9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Public exploit or proof-of-concept code is available
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 11%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: Public PoCExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

An integer overflow in the search_in_range function in regexec.c in Oniguruma 6.x before 6.9.4_rc2 leads to an out-of-bounds read, in which the offset of this read is under the control of an attacker. (This only affects the 32-bit compiled version). Remote attackers can cause a denial-of-service or information disclosure, or possibly have unspecified other impact, via a crafted regular expression.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
60
EG Risk 60/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
Exploitation public PoC (exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
11%
EPSS %ILE
95th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.NVD CVSS v3 · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
EG Likelihood
11% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-22). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track* at medium mission impactTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation public PoC (exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

November 17, 2019

Last Modified

November 21, 2024

Advisory Details (6)

Auto-updated Oct 5, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github_release.
Web page

GitHub - tarantula-team/CVE-2019-19012: An integer overflow in the search_in_range function in regexec.c in Oniguruma 6.x before 6.9.4_rc2 leads to an out-of-bounds read · GitHub

https://github.com/tarantula-team/CVE-2019-19012
GitHub release Patch Available

6.9.4 Release Candidate 2

Patch available: kkos/oniguruma v6.9.4_rc2 (pre-release)

https://github.com/kkos/oniguruma/releases/tag/v6.9.4_rc2
Web page

Integer overflow related to reg->dmax in search_in_range (regexec.c) · Issue #164 · kkos/oniguruma · GitHub

https://github.com/kkos/oniguruma/issues/164
Web page

[SECURITY] Fedora 30 Update: oniguruma-6.9.2-4.fc30 - package-announce - Fedora mailing-lists

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/V3MBNW6Z4DOXSCNWGBLQ7OA3OGUJ44WL/
Web page

[SECURITY] Fedora 31 Update: oniguruma-6.9.4-1.fc31 - package-announce - Fedora mailing-lists

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/NO267PLHGYZSWX3XTRPKYBKD4J3YOU5V/
Web pageMentions a patch (unverified)

[SECURITY] [DLA 2020-1] libonig security update

https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/12/msg00002.html

Patch Availability(6)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntulibonig-dev (5.9.1-1ubuntu1.1+esm2) @ trusty2026-10-23ubuntu
ubuntulibonig-dev (5.9.6-1ubuntu0.1+esm3) @ xenial2026-10-23ubuntu
redhatruby:2.5-8100020250506105643.489197e62025-05-14redhat
redhatoniguruma-0:6.8.2-2.1.el8_92024-02-20redhat
redhatoniguruma-0:6.8.2-2.1.el8_82024-01-30redhat
redhatoniguruma-0:6.8.2-2.1.el8_62024-01-25redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(6 across 6 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
libonig—
  • every version up to 6.9.4-1: fixed in 6.9.4-1
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
libonig—
  • every version up to 6.9.4-1: fixed in 6.9.4-1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
libonig—
  • every version up to 6.9.4-1: fixed in 6.9.4-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
libonig—
  • every version up to 6.9.4-1: fixed in 6.9.4-1
—
Debian:8(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
libonig5.9.5-3.2, 5.9.5-3.2+deb8u1, 5.9.5-3.2+deb8u2, 5.9.5-3.2+deb8u3
  • every version up to 5.9.5-3.2+deb8u4: fixed in 5.9.5-3.2+deb8u4
—
Debian:9(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
libonig6.1.3-2
  • every version up to 6.1.3-2+deb9u1: fixed in 6.1.3-2+deb9u1
—

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(2)

Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 27× in last 7d / 61× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 99 of 196 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 1 repeat row among the latest 100 is merged into the row it repeats. The 97 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-23 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  2. 2026-10-23 04:20 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-23 04:20 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-10-23 04:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5mw9-mr3r-536c · GitHub severity HIGH
  5. 2026-10-22 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  6. 2026-10-22 05:12 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-22 05:12 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-10-22 05:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5mw9-mr3r-536c · GitHub severity HIGH
  9. 2026-10-21 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  10. 2026-10-21 06:02 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-21 06:02 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-10-21 06:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5mw9-mr3r-536c · GitHub severity HIGH
  13. 2026-10-20 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  14. 2026-10-20 06:54 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-20 06:54 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-10-20 06:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5mw9-mr3r-536c · GitHub severity HIGH
  17. 2026-10-19 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  18. 2026-10-19 07:44 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-19 07:44 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-10-19 07:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5mw9-mr3r-536c · GitHub severity HIGH
  21. 2026-10-18 08:33 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-18 08:33 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-10-18 08:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5mw9-mr3r-536c · GitHub severity HIGH
  24. 2026-10-17 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  25. 2026-10-17 09:23 UTCEG score recompute
Show 74 more
  1. 2026-10-17 09:23 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-10-17 09:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5mw9-mr3r-536c · GitHub severity HIGH
  3. 2026-10-16 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  4. 2026-10-16 10:15 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-16 10:15 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-10-16 10:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5mw9-mr3r-536c · GitHub severity HIGH
  7. 2026-10-15 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  8. 2026-10-15 09:58 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-15 09:58 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-10-15 09:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5mw9-mr3r-536c · GitHub severity HIGH
  11. 2026-10-14 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  12. 2026-10-14 06:10 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-14 06:10 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-10-14 06:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5mw9-mr3r-536c · GitHub severity HIGH
  15. 2026-10-13 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  16. 2026-10-13 01:26 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-10-13 01:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5mw9-mr3r-536c · GitHub severity HIGH
  18. 2026-10-12 19:58 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-12 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  20. 2026-10-12 00:22 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-11 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  22. 2026-10-10 19:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  23. 2026-10-09 20:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  24. 2026-10-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  25. 2026-10-07 23:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  26. 2026-10-06 15:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  27. 2026-10-05 17:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  28. 2026-10-03 14:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  29. 2026-09-30 14:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  30. 2026-09-30 10:15 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-09-28 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  32. 2026-09-27 15:37 UTCOSV refresh
  33. 2026-09-27 13:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  34. 2026-09-26 15:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  35. 2026-09-26 00:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  36. 2026-09-24 13:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  37. 2026-09-23 13:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  38. 2026-09-22 14:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  39. 2026-09-21 20:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  40. 2026-09-18 19:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  41. 2026-09-17 19:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  42. 2026-09-16 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  43. 2026-09-15 03:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  44. 2026-09-12 14:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  45. 2026-09-11 14:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  46. 2026-09-11 09:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  47. 2026-09-08 00:10 UTCOSV refresh
  48. 2026-09-07 15:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  49. 2026-09-06 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  50. 2026-09-05 15:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  51. 2026-09-04 13:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  52. 2026-09-02 14:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  53. 2026-09-01 03:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  54. 2026-08-30 19:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  55. 2026-08-30 01:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  56. 2026-08-28 21:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  57. 2026-08-27 14:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  58. 2026-08-26 14:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  59. 2026-08-25 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  60. 2026-08-24 14:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  61. 2026-08-21 23:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  62. 2026-08-21 10:14 UTCOSV refresh
  63. 2026-08-20 22:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  64. 2026-08-19 17:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  65. 2026-08-18 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  66. 2026-08-16 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  67. 2026-08-16 02:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  68. 2026-08-15 01:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  69. 2026-08-12 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  70. 2026-08-08 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  71. 2026-08-07 16:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  72. 2026-08-06 13:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile
  73. 2026-08-05 22:51 UTCOSV refresh
  74. 2026-08-05 19:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 11% · 95th percentile

Publicly available exploits

(1 reference)

Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 GitHub PoC). Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.

  • GitHub PoCManhNDd/CVE-2019-19012
    Published Nov 20, 2019

    Integer overflow in Oniguruma

    Open source ↗

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2019-19012?
CVE-2019-19012 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on November 17, 2019. An integer overflow in the searchinrange function in regexec.c in Oniguruma 6.x before 6.9.4_rc2 leads to an out-of-bounds read, in which the offset of this read is under the control of an attacker. (This only affects the 32-bit compiled version). Remote attackers can cause a denial-of-service or…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2019-19012 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2019-19012 was published on November 17, 2019. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 21, 2024; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2019-19012 actively exploited?
CVE-2019-19012 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 11% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (95th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2019-19012?
CVE-2019-19012 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2019-19012?
A fix for CVE-2019-19012 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2019-19012 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2019-19012

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2019-19012?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.