In Eclipse Jetty, versions 9.4.27.v20200227 to 9.4.29.v20200521, in case of too large response headers, Jetty throws an exception to produce an HTTP 431 error. When this happens, the ByteBuffer containing the HTTP response headers is released back to the ByteBufferPool twice. Because of this double release, two threads can acquire the same ByteBuffer from the pool and while thread1 is about to use the ByteBuffer to write response1 data, thread2 fills the ByteBuffer with other data. Thread1 then proceeds to write the buffer that now contains different data. This results in client1, which issued request1 seeing data from another request or response which could contain sensitive data belonging to client2 (HTTP session ids, authentication credentials, etc.). If the Jetty version cannot be upgraded, the vulnerability can be significantly reduced by configuring a responseHeaderSize significantly larger than the requestHeaderSize (12KB responseHeaderSize and 8KB requestHeaderSize).
CVE-2019-17638
This critical-severity CVE scores 9.4 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 30.9%, top 3% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 9.4
- EG Score
- 9.4(medium)
- EPSS
- 95.4%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
July 9, 2020
Last Modified
November 21, 2024
References (34)
- emo@eclipsehttp://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2020/08/17/1
- emo@eclipsehttps://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=564984
- emo@eclipsehttps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r29073905dc9139d0d7a146595694bf57bb9e35e5ec6aa73eb9c8443a%40%3Ccommits.pulsar.apache.org%3E
- emo@eclipsehttps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r378e4cdec15e132575aa1dcb6296ffeff2a896745a8991522e266ad4%40%3Ccommits.pulsar.apache.org%3E
- emo@eclipsehttps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r4bdd3f7bb6820a79f9416b6667d718a06d269018619a75ce4b759318%40%3Ccommits.pulsar.apache.org%3E
- emo@eclipsehttps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r521168299e023fb075b57afe33d17ff1d09e8a10e0fd8c775ea0e028%40%3Ccommits.pulsar.apache.org%3E
- emo@eclipsehttps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r7fc5f2ed49641ea91c433e3cd0fc3d31c0278c87b82b15c33b881415%40%3Ccommits.pulsar.apache.org%3E
- emo@eclipsehttps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r81f58591fb4716fb867b36956f30c7c8ad4ab3f23abc952d9d86a2a0%40%3Ccommits.pulsar.apache.org%3E
- emo@eclipsehttps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r9584c4304c888f651d214341a939bd264ed30c9e3d0d30fe85097ecf%40%3Ccommits.pulsar.apache.org%3E
- emo@eclipsehttps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r9a2cfa56d30782a0c17a5deb951a622d1f5c8de48e1c3b578ffc2a84%40%3Ccommits.pulsar.apache.org%3E
- emo@eclipsehttps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ra8661fc8c69c647cb06153c1485d48484a833d873f75dfe45937e9de%40%3Ccommits.pulsar.apache.org%3E
- emo@eclipsehttps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rbe1f230e87ea947593145d0072d0097ddb0af10fee1161db8ca1546c%40%3Ccommits.pulsar.apache.org%3E
- emo@eclipsehttps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rd0e44e8ef71eeaaa3cf3d1b8b41eb25894372e2995ec908ce7624d26%40%3Ccommits.pulsar.apache.org%3E
- emo@eclipsehttps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rd98cfd012490cb02caa1a11aaa0cc38bff2d43bcce9b20c2f01063dd%40%3Ccommits.pulsar.apache.org%3E
- emo@eclipsehttps://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/XE6US6VPZHOWFMUSFGDS5V2DNQPY5MKB/
Vendor Advisories for CVE-2019-17638(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Patch Availability(5)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fixed in / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | jetty | 2020-12-16 | redhat |
| redhat | jenkins-0:2.235.5.1600415953-1.el7 | 2020-10-22 | redhat |
| redhat | openshift4/ose-jenkins:v4.4.0-202009260441.p0 | 2020-10-13 | redhat |
| redhat | jenkins-0:2.235.5.1600414805-1.el7 | 2020-09-30 | redhat |
| redhat | jenkins-0:2.235.5.1600415514-1.el7 | 2020-09-23 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Maven(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-server | 9.4.27.v20200227, 9.4.28.v20200408, 9.4.29.v20200521 | 9.4.30.v20200611 | — |
Weakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Additional Vendor Advisories
(4)
Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 37× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-07-11 08:24 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-11 08:24 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-09 19:06 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-08 15:11 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-07 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-06 16:25 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-06 16:25 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-06 02:20 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-05 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-04 06:28 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-01 15:03 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-07-01 15:03 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-01 15:03 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-30 23:20 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-29 14:03 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-28 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-28 04:54 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-28 04:54 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-27 03:06 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-25 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-25 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-24 14:03 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-24 14:03 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-23 21:30 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 34 moreShow fewer
- 2026-06-22 14:23 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-21 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-21 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-18 17:50 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-17 17:50 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-16 17:50 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-15 17:45 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-14 23:15 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-14 23:15 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-13 23:43 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-06-13 22:58 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-12 23:09 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-11 13:58 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-10 22:16 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-10 13:19 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-05 22:45 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-05 22:45 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-04 13:10 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-04 13:10 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-02 20:11 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-02 20:11 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-01 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-01 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-31 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-31 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-31 00:14 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-31 00:14 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-29 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-28 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-27 13:38 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-27 01:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-05-27 01:31 UTCVendor advisory
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2019-17638?
When was CVE-2019-17638 disclosed?
Is CVE-2019-17638 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2019-17638?
How do I remediate CVE-2019-17638?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2019-17638
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2019-17638?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.