A Denial of service (DoS) vulnerability in FortiClient for Linux 6.2.1 and below may allow an user with low privilege to cause FortiClient processes running under root privilege crashes via sending specially crafted IPC client requests to the fctsched process due the nanomsg not been correctly validated.
CVE-2019-16152
This medium-severity CVE scores 6.5 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 1.4% (71st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.
Internet exposure
The internet-exposure footprint is temporarily unavailable — the KEV-Exposure radar's record for this CVE could not be loaded just now. That is not a finding of zero exposed services; please retry shortly.
- CVSS v3
- 6.5
- EG Score
- 6.5MEDIUMmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 30EG Risk 30/100CISA SSVC
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity65% × 45%Exploitation1% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%CISA SSVC: Track at every mission impact level.Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix. - EPSS PROB
- 1.4%
- EPSS %ILE
- 71st
- KEV
- Not listed
CISA SSVCTrack at every mission impact level.
No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table
Published
February 6, 2020
Last Modified
November 21, 2024
References (4)
- psirt@fortinethttps://danishcyberdefence.dk/blog/forticlient_linux
- psirt@fortinethttps://fortiguard.com/psirt/FG-IR-19-238
- af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108https://danishcyberdefence.dk/blog/forticlient_linux
- af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108https://fortiguard.com/psirt/FG-IR-19-238
Vendor Advisories for CVE-2019-16152
Vendor advisories for this CVE are temporarily unavailable — the list could not be loaded just now. That is not a sign that none exist; please retry shortly.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Related CVEs
Related CVEs are temporarily unavailable — the same-product, same-vendor and same-CWE lists could not be loaded just now. That is not a sign that none exist; please retry shortly.
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2019-16152?
When was CVE-2019-16152 disclosed?
Is CVE-2019-16152 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2019-16152?
How do I remediate CVE-2019-16152?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2019-16152
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2019-16152?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.