If an application encounters a fatal protocol error and then calls SSL_shutdown() twice (once to send a close_notify, and once to receive one) then OpenSSL can respond differently to the calling application if a 0 byte record is received with invalid padding compared to if a 0 byte record is received with an invalid MAC. If the application then behaves differently based on that in a way that is detectable to the remote peer, then this amounts to a padding oracle that could be used to decrypt data. In order for this to be exploitable "non-stitched" ciphersuites must be in use. Stitched ciphersuites are optimised implementations of certain commonly used ciphersuites. Also the application must call SSL_shutdown() twice even if a protocol error has occurred (applications should not do this but some do anyway). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2r (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2q).
CVE-2019-1559
Score 5.9 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2022-05-13. NVD baseline CVSS 5.9; sources differ by 0.0.
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 5.9
- EG Score
- 5.9(medium)
- EG Risk
- 47(Track)EG Risk 47/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity59% × 45%Exploitation40% × 40%Automatability30% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 17%
- EPSS %ILE
- 97%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
February 27, 2019
Last Modified
November 21, 2024
References (72)
- openssl-security@opensslhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-03/msg00041.html
- openssl-security@opensslhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00019.html
- openssl-security@opensslhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00046.html
- openssl-security@opensslhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00047.html
- openssl-security@opensslhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00049.html
- openssl-security@opensslhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-06/msg00080.html
- openssl-security@opensslhttp://www.securityfocus.com/bid/107174
- openssl-security@opensslhttps://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2304
- openssl-security@opensslhttps://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2437
- openssl-security@opensslhttps://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2439
- openssl-security@opensslhttps://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2471
- openssl-security@opensslhttps://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3929
- openssl-security@opensslhttps://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3931
- openssl-security@opensslhttps://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=e9bbefbf0f24c57645e7ad6a5a71ae649d18ac8e
- openssl-security@opensslhttps://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=SB10282
Vendor Advisories for CVE-2019-1559(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Patch Availability(9)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fixed in / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| ubuntu | openssl (1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.15) @ xenial | 2026-05-27 | ubuntu |
| ubuntu | libssl1.0.0-udeb (1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.27+esm1) @ trusty | 2026-05-27 | ubuntu |
| redhat | ansible-tower-37/ansible-tower-memcached-rhel7:1.4.15-28 | 2020-02-18 | redhat |
| redhat | openssl | 2019-11-20 | redhat |
| redhat | jws5-tomcat-vault-0:1.1.8-1.Final_redhat_1.1.el8jws | 2019-11-20 | redhat |
| redhat | openssl-0:1.0.1e-58.el6_10 | 2019-08-13 | redhat |
| redhat | redhat-virtualization-host-0:4.3.5-20190722.0.el7_7 | 2019-08-12 | redhat |
| redhat | rhvm-appliance-0:4.3-20190722.0.el7 | 2019-08-12 | redhat |
| redhat | openssl-1:1.0.2k-19.el7 | 2019-08-06 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(9 across 9 ecosystems)
Alpine:v3.6(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssl | — | 1.0.2r-r0 | — |
Alpine:v3.7(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssl | — | 1.0.2r-r0 | — |
Alpine:v3.8(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssl | — | 1.0.2r-r0 | — |
Debian:11(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssl | — | 1.1.0b-2 | — |
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssl | — | 1.1.0b-2 | — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssl | — | 1.1.0b-2 | — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssl | — | 1.1.0b-2 | — |
Debian:8(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssl | 1.0.1k-3 ... 1.0.1t-1+deb8u9 (17 versions) | 1.0.1t-1+deb8u11 | — |
Debian:9(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssl1.0 | 1.0.2l-2 ... 1.0.2q-2 (14 versions) | 1.0.2r-1~deb9u1 | — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Additional Vendor Advisories
(8)
Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.
- Red HatRHSA-2019:2304MODERATE2019-02-26
RHSA-2019:2304 — Moderate
- Red HatRHSA-2019:2437MODERATE2019-02-26
RHSA-2019:2437 — Moderate
- Red HatRHSA-2019:2439MODERATE2019-02-26
RHSA-2019:2439 — Moderate
- Red HatRHSA-2019:2471MODERATE2019-02-26
RHSA-2019:2471 — Moderate
- Red HatRHSA-2019:3929MODERATE2019-02-26
RHSA-2019:3929 — Moderate
- Red HatRHSA-2019:3931MODERATE2019-02-26
RHSA-2019:3931 — Moderate
- UbuntuUSN-3899-1MEDIUM
OpenSSL vulnerability
- UbuntuUSN-4376-2MEDIUM
OpenSSL vulnerabilities
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 5× in last 7d / 24× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 136 total refreshes for this CVE.
- 2026-09-18 19:22 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-17 19:22 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-16 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-15 03:05 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-12 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-11 14:48 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-11 09:32 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-08 16:04 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-07 15:57 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-06 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-05 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-04 13:56 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-02 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-01 03:32 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-30 19:13 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-30 01:18 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-28 21:36 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-27 14:21 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-26 14:42 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-25 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-24 14:11 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-22 02:11 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-21 23:45 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-20 22:51 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-19 17:00 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-08-18 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-17 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-16 14:52 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-16 02:10 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-15 01:26 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-12 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-08 16:33 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-07 16:23 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-06 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-06 06:24 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-05 19:13 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-04 15:05 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-01 04:12 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-30 16:24 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-28 15:32 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-26 14:51 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-25 14:14 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-24 14:14 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-24 14:14 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-23 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-23 01:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 22:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-21 15:22 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-21 15:22 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-20 21:32 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-07-20 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-20 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-19 02:26 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-19 02:26 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-18 10:01 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-16 16:59 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-16 16:59 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-15 16:55 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-15 16:55 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-13 22:27 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-13 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-13 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-12 05:43 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-12 05:43 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-11 08:24 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-11 08:24 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-09 19:06 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-08 15:11 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-07 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-06 16:25 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-06 16:25 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-06 02:20 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-05 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-03 16:56 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-07-01 15:03 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-01 15:03 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-30 23:20 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-29 14:03 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-28 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-28 04:54 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-28 04:54 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-27 03:06 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-25 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-25 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-24 14:03 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-24 14:03 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-23 21:30 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-21 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-21 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-21 01:57 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-21 01:57 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-19 19:23 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-19 19:23 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-18 17:50 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-17 17:50 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-16 17:50 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-15 17:45 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-15 05:43 UTCOSV refresh
Related CVEs(same vendor + same CWE)
Same vendor
10 shownredhat
- CVE-2001-0825EG 10.0HIGH
- CVE-2001-1009EG 10.0EPSS p93HIGH
- CVE-2001-0554EG 10.0EPSS p99HIGH
- CVE-2001-1162EG 10.0EPSS p96HIGH
- CVE-2001-0414EG 10.0EPSS p100HIGH
- CVE-2001-0191EG 10.0EPSS p92HIGH
- CVE-2001-0301EG 10.0EPSS p91HIGH
- CVE-2001-0197EG 10.0EPSS p96HIGH
- CVE-2001-0233EG 10.0EPSS p96HIGH
- CVE-2001-0010EG 10.0EPSS p98HIGH
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-203
- CVE-2019-10071EG 9.8EPSS p95CRITICAL
- CVE-2018-1000884EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2017-5753NVD 5.6EG 9.0EPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2017-5715NVD 5.6EG 8.3EPSS p99HIGH
- CVE-2019-10233EG 8.1HIGH
- CVE-2018-9364EG 7.5HIGH
- CVE-2013-10006NVD 2.6EG 7.5HIGH
- CVE-2019-1020002EG 7.5HIGH
- CVE-2019-10114EG 7.5HIGH
- CVE-2017-13099NVD 5.9EG 7.5EPSS p98HIGH
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2019-1559?
When was CVE-2019-1559 disclosed?
Is CVE-2019-1559 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2019-1559?
How do I remediate CVE-2019-1559?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2019-1559
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2019-1559?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.