An issue was discovered in PRTG Network Monitor before 18.2.39. An attacker who has access to the PRTG System Administrator web console with administrative privileges can exploit an OS command injection vulnerability (both on the server and on devices) by sending malformed parameters in sensor or notification management scenarios.
CVE-2018-9276
“▲” beside the score: it is higher than NVD's CVSS score.
Score elevated to 9.0 because this CVE is listed on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2025-02-04), indicating real-world exploitation has been confirmed by US federal agencies. NVD baseline CVSS 7.2 retained for reference. The 9.0 is the floor for confirmed exploitation, not an impact rating: this CVE's impact severity (EG Severity) is CVSS 7.2 HIGH under GitHub Security Advisory CVSS. Confidence: HIGH.
- Actively exploited in the wild (CISA-KEV) — the reason this is sooner than the SSVC decision on this page at low or medium mission impact
No fix has been recorded since the CVE record was published in 2018 — use a compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and check the vendor's advisory.
The CVE record's description, written by its CNA (MITRE Corporation), states the affected versions: "An issue was discovered in PRTG Network Monitor before 18.2.39." No release containing a fix is confirmed on record.
- CVSS v3
- 7.2
- EG Score
- 9.0CRITICALhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 72EG Risk 72/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity72% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.2 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation100% × 40%Fixed at 100% for a CISA KEV listing: EchelonGraph's rule.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Attend at medium and Act at high mission impact.Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: No fix has been recorded since the CVE record was published in 2018. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low, sooner than that at medium and as soon as possible at high mission impact, and check the vendor's advisory for a fix. - EPSS PROB
- 87%
- EPSS %ILE
- 99th
- KEV
- ⚠ Exploited
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (9.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.0 is the CISA KEV floor for confirmed exploitation, not an impact rating: its impact severity (EG Severity) is CVSS 7.2 HIGH.
- EG Severity
- 7.2 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 87% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-22). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- CISA KEV and EG-KEV Tier 1 (exploited in the wild)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Attend at medium mission impactTrack at low, Attend at medium and Act at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 14 days if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Attend at medium and Act at high mission impact.
No fix has been recorded since the CVE record was published in 2018. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low, sooner than that at medium and as soon as possible at high mission impact, and check the vendor's advisory for a fix.
Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 14 days if it is not.
In CISA KEV yes (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
CISA required action“Apply mitigations per vendor instructions or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.”
Quoted verbatim from CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. CISA directs it at US federal civilian executive branch agencies under Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 26-04, which replaced BOD 22-01 on 10 June 2026; it is not EchelonGraph's advice. CISA's notes: https://www.paessler.com/prtg/history/prtg-18#18.2.39 · https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-9276
Published
July 2, 2018
Last Modified
November 6, 2025
Advisory Details (5)
Auto-updated Oct 20, 2026Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog | CISA
Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog | CISA. Listed in CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2018-9276PRTG Network Monitor 18.2.38 - (Authenticated) Remote Code Execution - Windows webapps Exploit
https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/46527/Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 17× in last 7d / 146× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 915 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 815 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-22 22:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-22 22:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-21 23:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-21 23:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-21 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 87% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-21 00:12 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-21 00:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-20 00:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-20 00:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-19 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 87% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-19 01:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-19 01:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-18 10:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-18 02:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-18 02:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-17 02:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 02:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-16 03:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-16 03:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-15 04:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-15 04:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-14 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 87% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-14 05:04 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-14 05:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-13 05:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-12 20:07 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 06:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-12 02:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-11 21:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 21:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-11 17:13 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 17:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-11 12:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 12:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-11 08:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-11 03:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-10 23:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-10 19:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-10 14:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-10 10:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-10 05:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-10 01:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-09 21:07 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-09 21:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-09 20:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 87% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-09 16:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-09 12:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-09 07:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-09 03:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-08 23:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-08 18:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-08 14:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-08 09:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-08 05:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-08 01:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-07 20:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-07 16:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-07 11:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-07 07:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-07 03:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-06 22:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-06 18:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-06 18:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-06 15:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 87% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-06 14:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-06 09:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-06 05:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-06 00:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-05 20:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-05 16:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-05 11:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-05 07:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-05 02:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-04 22:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-04 18:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-04 13:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-04 09:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-04 04:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-04 00:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-03 20:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-03 15:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-03 11:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-03 07:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-03 02:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-02 22:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-02 17:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-02 13:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-02 09:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-02 04:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-02 00:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-01 20:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-01 15:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-01 11:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-01 06:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-10-01 02:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-09-30 22:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-09-30 17:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 17:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-09-30 14:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 87% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-30 13:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cjqq-8xv6-575p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
Publicly available exploits
(3 references)Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 Metasploit module, 1 Exploit-DB entry, 1 GitHub PoC). No fix has been recorded since the CVE record was published in 2018. If the vendor still supports the product, apply the fixed version it names; if it no longer does, isolate the affected system.
- Metasploitexploit/windows/http/prtg_authenticated_rce✓ verifiedPublished Jan 27, 2021
PRTG Network Monitor Authenticated RCE
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCwildkindcc/CVE-2018-9276Published Mar 31, 2019
CVE-2018-9276 PRTG < 18.2.39 Authenticated Command Injection (Reverse Shell)
Open source ↗ - Exploit-DBEDB-46527Published Mar 11, 2019
PRTG Network Monitor 18.2.38 - (Authenticated) Remote Code Execution
Open source ↗
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-78
- CVE-2018-4860EG 7.2EPSS p90HIGH
- CVE-2018-4859EG 7.2EPSS p90HIGH
- CVE-2018-6831EG 7.2EPSS p91HIGH
- CVE-2018-5553EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2018-6211EG 7.2EPSS p93HIGH
- CVE-2018-6961NVD 8.1EG 9.0 KEVEPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2018-6662EG 7.8HIGH
- CVE-2018-3757EG 9.8EPSS p92CRITICAL
- CVE-2018-3746EG 9.8EPSS p92CRITICAL
- CVE-2018-3937EG 9.1EPSS p95CRITICAL
Frequently asked(6)
What is CVE-2018-9276?
When was CVE-2018-9276 made public?
Is CVE-2018-9276 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2018-9276?
Which products are affected by CVE-2018-9276?
How do I remediate CVE-2018-9276?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2018-9276
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2018-9276?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.