A vulnerability in the update service of Cisco Webex Meetings Desktop App for Windows could allow an authenticated, local attacker to execute arbitrary commands as a privileged user. The vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied parameters. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by invoking the update service command with a crafted argument. An exploit could allow the attacker to run arbitrary commands with SYSTEM user privileges. While the CVSS Attack Vector metric denotes the requirement for an attacker to have local access, administrators should be aware that in Active Directory deployments, the vulnerability could be exploited remotely by leveraging the operating system remote management tools.
CVE-2018-15442
“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.
Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2022-05-13. NVD baseline CVSS 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.
- Public exploit code is available (Metasploit, Exploit-DB, marked verified by Exploit-DB)
No fix has been recorded since the CVE record was published in 2018 — use a compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and check the vendor's advisory.
- CVSS v3
- 7.8
- EG Score
- 7.8HIGHmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 61EG Risk 61/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity78% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation65% × 40%EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 2 (Weaponized): a constant, not a probability.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: No fix has been recorded since the CVE record was published in 2018. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines, and check the vendor's advisory for a fix. - EPSS PROB
- 16%
- EPSS %ILE
- 96th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (7.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 7.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 16% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-21). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
No fix has been recorded since the CVE record was published in 2018. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines, and check the vendor's advisory for a fix.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
October 24, 2018
Last Modified
November 21, 2024
Advisory Details (4)
Auto-updated Sep 30, 2026WebEx - Local Service Permissions Exploit (Metasploit) - Windows local Exploit
https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/45696/WebExec - (Authenticated) User Code Execution (Metasploit) - Windows remote Exploit
https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/45695/Cisco Webex Meetings Desktop App Update Service Command Injection Vulnerability
https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20181024-webex-injectionWeakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 31× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 92 of 157 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 8 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 65 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-23 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-10-22 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-10-21 20:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-21 20:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-766m-hqm4-2gcf · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-21 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-10-20 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-10-19 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-10-18 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-10-18 10:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-10-16 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-10-15 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-10-14 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-10-13 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-10-12 20:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 00:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-10-10 19:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-10-08 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-09-30 14:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
Show 67 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-30 09:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-09-27 13:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-09-26 00:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-09-24 13:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-09-23 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-09-21 20:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-09-19 15:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-09-18 19:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-09-17 19:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-09-16 14:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-09-16 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-09-15 03:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-09-13 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-09-12 14:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-09-11 14:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-09-10 09:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-09-05 15:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-09-04 13:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-09-04 05:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-09-02 14:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-09-01 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-09-01 03:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-08-30 19:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-08-28 21:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-08-27 14:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-08-26 14:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-08-25 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-08-23 00:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-08-21 23:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-08-20 22:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-08-19 17:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-08-18 13:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-08-17 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-08-16 14:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-08-16 02:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-08-15 01:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-08-13 21:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-08-12 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-08-11 13:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-08-09 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-08-08 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-08-07 16:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-08-06 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-08-04 15:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-08-02 02:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-08-01 04:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-07-30 16:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-07-28 15:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-07-26 14:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-07-24 14:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-07-23 14:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-07-23 01:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 22:13 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-07-21 15:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-07-20 17:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-07-19 14:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-07-19 02:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-07-16 16:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-07-15 16:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-07-15 01:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-07-13 22:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-07-13 06:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
- 2026-07-12 05:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
Publicly available exploits
(5 references)Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (3 Metasploit modules, 2 Exploit-DB entries). No fix has been recorded since the CVE record was published in 2018. If the vendor still supports the product, apply the fixed version it names; if it no longer does, isolate the affected system.
- Exploit-DBEDB-45695✓ verifiedPublished Oct 25, 2018
WebExec - (Authenticated) User Code Execution (Metasploit)
Open source ↗ - Exploit-DBEDB-45696✓ verifiedPublished Oct 25, 2018
WebEx - Local Service Permissions Exploit (Metasploit)
Open source ↗ - Metasploitauxiliary/admin/smb/webexec_command✓ verifiedPublished Oct 24, 2018
WebEx Remote Command Execution Utility
Open source ↗ - Metasploitexploit/windows/local/webexec✓ verifiedPublished Oct 24, 2018
WebEx Local Service Permissions Exploit
Open source ↗ - Metasploitexploit/windows/smb/webexec✓ verifiedPublished Oct 24, 2018
WebExec Authenticated User Code Execution
Open source ↗
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-78
- CVE-2018-18638EG 8.1HIGH
- CVE-2018-18728EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2018-12670EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2018-14558EG 9.8 KEVEPSS p95CRITICAL
- CVE-2018-16461EG 9.8EPSS p90CRITICAL
- CVE-2018-16462EG 10.0EPSS p94CRITICAL
- CVE-2018-16232EG 8.8EPSS p95HIGH
- CVE-2018-14772EG 7.2EPSS p94HIGH
- CVE-2018-17532EG 9.8EPSS p99CRITICAL
- CVE-2018-18322EG 9.8EPSS p97CRITICAL
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2018-15442?
When was CVE-2018-15442 made public?
Is CVE-2018-15442 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2018-15442?
How do I remediate CVE-2018-15442?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2018-15442
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2018-15442?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.