A vulnerability in the Cisco Fabric Services component of Cisco FXOS Software and Cisco NX-OS Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to obtain sensitive information from memory or cause a denial of service (DoS) condition on the affected product. The vulnerability exists because the affected software insufficiently validates header values in Cisco Fabric Services packets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted Cisco Fabric Services packet to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause a buffer overread condition, which could allow the attacker to obtain sensitive information from memory or cause a DoS condition on the affected product. This vulnerability affects Firepower 4100 Series Next-Generation Firewalls, Firepower 9300 Security Appliance, MDS 9000 Series Multilayer Switches, Nexus 2000 Series Fabric Extenders, Nexus 3000 Series Switches, Nexus 3500 Platform Switches, Nexus 5500 Platform Switches, Nexus 5600 Platform Switches, Nexus 6000 Series Switches, Nexus 7000 Series Switches, Nexus 7700 Series Switches, Nexus 9000 Series Switches in standalone NX-OS mode, Nexus 9500 R-Series Line Cards and Fabric Modules, UCS 6100 Series Fabric Interconnects, UCS 6200 Series Fabric Interconnects, UCS 6300 Series Fabric Interconnects. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvd69957, CSCve02435, CSCve04859, CSCve41536, CSCve41538, CSCve41559.
CVE-2018-0310
Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2022-05-13. NVD baseline CVSS 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
No fix has been recorded since the CVE record was published in 2018 — isolate the affected system (restrict network access to it, for example with a firewall, or keep it off the internet) or retire the product.
- CVSS v3
- 9.8
- EG Score
- 9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 61EG Risk 61/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity98% × 45%The EG Score, 9.8 of 10.Exploitation4% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: No fix has been recorded since the CVE record was published in 2018. Isolate the affected system within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (restrict network access to it, for example with a firewall, or keep it off the internet) or retire the product. - EPSS PROB
- 4.1%
- EPSS %ILE
- 90th
- KEV
- Not listed
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
No fix has been recorded since the CVE record was published in 2018. Isolate the affected system within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (restrict network access to it, for example with a firewall, or keep it off the internet) or retire the product.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
Published
June 21, 2018
Last Modified
November 21, 2024
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Oct 7, 2026Cisco FXOS and NX-OS Software Cisco Fabric Services Denial of Service Vulnerability
https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20180620-nx-os-fabric-dosWeakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 21× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 81 of 135 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 19 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 54 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-11 13:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.1% · 90th percentile
- 2026-10-10 19:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.1% · 90th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.1% · 90th percentile
- 2026-10-08 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.1% · 90th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.1% · 90th percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.1% · 90th percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.1% · 90th percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.1% · 90th percentile
- 2026-09-30 14:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.1% · 90th percentile
- 2026-09-30 09:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.1% · 90th percentile
- 2026-09-27 13:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.1% · 90th percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.1% · 90th percentile
- 2026-09-26 00:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.1% · 90th percentile
- 2026-09-24 13:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.1% · 90th percentile
- 2026-09-23 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.1% · 90th percentile
- 2026-09-21 20:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.6% · 88th percentile
- 2026-09-19 15:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.1% · 90th percentile
- 2026-09-17 19:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.1% · 90th percentile
- 2026-09-15 03:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.1% · 90th percentile
- 2026-09-12 14:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.1% · 90th percentile
- 2026-09-11 09:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.1% · 90th percentile
- 2026-09-07 15:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.1% · 90th percentile
- 2026-09-05 15:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.6% · 88th percentile
- 2026-09-04 13:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.1% · 90th percentile
Show 56 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-04 05:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.1% · 90th percentile
- 2026-09-02 14:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.1% · 90th percentile
- 2026-09-01 03:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.1% · 90th percentile
- 2026-08-30 19:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.1% · 90th percentile
- 2026-08-28 21:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.6% · 88th percentile
- 2026-08-27 14:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.1% · 89th percentile
- 2026-08-26 14:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.1% · 89th percentile
- 2026-08-25 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-08-23 00:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-08-21 23:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-08-19 16:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-08-18 13:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-08-16 14:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 90th percentile
- 2026-08-16 02:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 89th percentile
- 2026-08-15 01:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 89th percentile
- 2026-08-12 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 89th percentile
- 2026-08-09 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 89th percentile
- 2026-08-08 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 89th percentile
- 2026-08-07 16:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 89th percentile
- 2026-08-06 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 89th percentile
- 2026-08-05 19:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 89th percentile
- 2026-08-02 02:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 89th percentile
- 2026-08-01 04:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 89th percentile
- 2026-07-30 16:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 89th percentile
- 2026-07-30 01:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 89th percentile
- 2026-07-28 15:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 89th percentile
- 2026-07-26 14:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 89th percentile
- 2026-07-23 14:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 89th percentile
- 2026-07-23 01:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 22:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 89th percentile
- 2026-07-21 15:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 89th percentile
- 2026-07-20 17:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 89th percentile
- 2026-07-19 14:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 89th percentile
- 2026-07-19 02:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 89th percentile
- 2026-07-18 10:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 89th percentile
- 2026-07-16 16:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 89th percentile
- 2026-07-15 16:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 89th percentile
- 2026-07-15 01:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 89th percentile
- 2026-07-13 22:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 89th percentile
- 2026-07-12 05:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 89th percentile
- 2026-07-11 08:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 89th percentile
- 2026-07-09 19:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 89th percentile
- 2026-07-08 15:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 89th percentile
- 2026-07-07 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 89th percentile
- 2026-07-06 16:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 89th percentile
- 2026-07-06 02:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 89th percentile
- 2026-07-05 02:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 89th percentile
- 2026-07-04 06:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 89th percentile
- 2026-07-02 16:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 89th percentile
- 2026-07-01 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 89th percentile
- 2026-06-30 23:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 89th percentile
- 2026-06-28 04:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 89th percentile
- 2026-06-27 03:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 89th percentile
- 2026-06-25 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 89th percentile
- 2026-06-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.2% · 89th percentile
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2018-0310?
When was CVE-2018-0310 made public?
Is CVE-2018-0310 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2018-0310?
How do I remediate CVE-2018-0310?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2018-0310
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2018-0310?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.