CVE-2018-0167

CRITICALNVD 8.89.0
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

“▲” beside the score: it is higher than NVD's CVSS score.

Score elevated to 9.0 because this CVE is listed on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2022-03-03), indicating real-world exploitation has been confirmed by US federal agencies. NVD baseline CVSS 8.8 retained for reference. The 9.0 is the floor for confirmed exploitation, not an impact rating: this CVE's impact severity (EG Severity) is CVSS 8.8 HIGH under GitHub Security Advisory CVSS. Confidence: HIGH.

Triggered by: CISA KEV (actively exploited)
Sources: CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — 3 sources updated this weekExploited in the wild
9.0EG
EchelonGraph verdictMitigate nowTreat as an emergency — this is being exploited.
  • Actively exploited in the wild (CISA-KEV) — the reason this is sooner than the SSVC decision on this page at low or medium mission impact
CISA-KEV: ExploitedEPSS PROB: 3.4%CVSS: 8.8Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

No fix has been recorded since the CVE record was published in 2018 — use a compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and check the vendor's advisory.

Multiple Buffer Overflow vulnerabilities in the Link Layer Discovery Protocol (LLDP) subsystem of Cisco IOS Software, Cisco IOS XE Software, and Cisco IOS XR Software could allow an unauthenticated, adjacent attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition or execute arbitrary code with elevated privileges on an affected device. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCuo17183, CSCvd73487.

CVSS v3
8.8
EG Score
9.0CRITICALhigh confidence
EG Risk
80
EG Risk 80/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity88% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation100% × 40%
Fixed at 100% for a CISA KEV listing: EchelonGraph's rule.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Attend at medium and Act at high mission impact.
Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: No fix has been recorded since the CVE record was published in 2018. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low, sooner than that at medium and as soon as possible at high mission impact, and check the vendor's advisory for a fix.
EPSS PROB
3.4%
EPSS %ILE
88th
KEV
⚠ Exploited

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.0 is the CISA KEV floor for confirmed exploitation, not an impact rating: its impact severity (EG Severity) is CVSS 8.8 HIGH.

EG Severity
8.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
3.4% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-22). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
CISA KEV and EG-KEV Tier 1 (exploited in the wild)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Attend at medium mission impactTrack at low, Attend at medium and Act at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 14 days if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Attend at medium and Act at high mission impact.

No fix has been recorded since the CVE record was published in 2018. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low, sooner than that at medium and as soon as possible at high mission impact, and check the vendor's advisory for a fix.

Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 14 days if it is not.

In CISA KEV yes (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

CISA required action“Apply updates per vendor instructions.”

Quoted verbatim from CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. CISA directs it at US federal civilian executive branch agencies under Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 26-04, which replaced BOD 22-01 on 10 June 2026; it is not EchelonGraph's advice. CISA's notes: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-0167

Published

March 28, 2018

Last Modified

January 14, 2026

Advisory Details (6)

Auto-updated Oct 19, 2026
⚠️ Actively exploited (CISA KEV, CISA Vulnrichment). No fix on record since 2018.
Web page

Rockwell Automation Stratix and ArmorStratix Switches | CISA

https://ics-cert.us-cert.gov/advisories/ICSA-18-107-04
Web page

Rockwell Automation Stratix Services Router | CISA

https://ics-cert.us-cert.gov/advisories/ICSA-18-107-03
Web page

CVE-2018-0167 - PSIRT.COM

http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/103564
Web page

Cisco IOS, IOS XE, and IOS XR Software Link Layer Discovery Protocol Buffer Overflow Vulnerabilities

https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20180328-lldp
Web page

Rockwell Automation Stratix Industrial Managed Ethernet Switch | CISA

https://ics-cert.us-cert.gov/advisories/ICSA-18-107-05

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 23× in last 7d / 180× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 1,060 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 960 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-23 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
  2. 2026-10-23 13:47 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-23 13:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h85m-74j9-4r6m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  4. 2026-10-22 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
  5. 2026-10-22 15:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h85m-74j9-4r6m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  6. 2026-10-21 16:34 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-21 16:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h85m-74j9-4r6m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  8. 2026-10-21 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
  9. 2026-10-20 17:57 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-20 17:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h85m-74j9-4r6m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  11. 2026-10-20 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
  12. 2026-10-19 19:20 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-19 19:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h85m-74j9-4r6m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  14. 2026-10-19 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
  15. 2026-10-18 20:44 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-18 20:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h85m-74j9-4r6m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  17. 2026-10-18 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
  18. 2026-10-18 10:25 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-17 22:08 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-17 22:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h85m-74j9-4r6m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  21. 2026-10-17 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
  22. 2026-10-16 23:29 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-16 23:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h85m-74j9-4r6m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  24. 2026-10-16 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
  25. 2026-10-16 00:52 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-16 00:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h85m-74j9-4r6m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  2. 2026-10-15 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
  3. 2026-10-15 02:16 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-15 02:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h85m-74j9-4r6m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  5. 2026-10-14 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
  6. 2026-10-14 03:39 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-14 03:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h85m-74j9-4r6m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  8. 2026-10-13 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
  9. 2026-10-13 05:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h85m-74j9-4r6m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  10. 2026-10-12 20:23 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-12 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
  12. 2026-10-12 06:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h85m-74j9-4r6m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  13. 2026-10-12 02:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h85m-74j9-4r6m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  14. 2026-10-11 21:40 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-11 21:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h85m-74j9-4r6m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  16. 2026-10-11 17:19 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-11 17:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h85m-74j9-4r6m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  18. 2026-10-11 13:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
  19. 2026-10-11 12:54 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-11 12:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h85m-74j9-4r6m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  21. 2026-10-11 08:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h85m-74j9-4r6m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  22. 2026-10-11 04:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h85m-74j9-4r6m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  23. 2026-10-10 23:46 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-10 23:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h85m-74j9-4r6m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  25. 2026-10-10 19:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
  26. 2026-10-10 19:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h85m-74j9-4r6m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  27. 2026-10-10 15:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h85m-74j9-4r6m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  28. 2026-10-10 10:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h85m-74j9-4r6m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  29. 2026-10-10 06:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h85m-74j9-4r6m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  30. 2026-10-10 01:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h85m-74j9-4r6m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  31. 2026-10-09 21:37 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-10-09 21:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h85m-74j9-4r6m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  33. 2026-10-09 20:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
  34. 2026-10-09 17:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h85m-74j9-4r6m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  35. 2026-10-09 12:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h85m-74j9-4r6m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  36. 2026-10-09 08:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h85m-74j9-4r6m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  37. 2026-10-09 04:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h85m-74j9-4r6m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  38. 2026-10-08 23:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h85m-74j9-4r6m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  39. 2026-10-08 19:25 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-10-08 19:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h85m-74j9-4r6m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  41. 2026-10-08 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
  42. 2026-10-08 15:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h85m-74j9-4r6m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  43. 2026-10-08 10:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h85m-74j9-4r6m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  44. 2026-10-08 06:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h85m-74j9-4r6m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  45. 2026-10-08 01:57 UTCEG score recompute
  46. 2026-10-08 01:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h85m-74j9-4r6m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  47. 2026-10-07 23:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
  48. 2026-10-07 21:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h85m-74j9-4r6m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  49. 2026-10-07 17:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h85m-74j9-4r6m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  50. 2026-10-07 12:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h85m-74j9-4r6m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  51. 2026-10-07 08:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h85m-74j9-4r6m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  52. 2026-10-07 04:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h85m-74j9-4r6m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  53. 2026-10-06 23:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h85m-74j9-4r6m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  54. 2026-10-06 19:22 UTCEG score recompute
  55. 2026-10-06 19:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h85m-74j9-4r6m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  56. 2026-10-06 15:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
  57. 2026-10-06 15:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h85m-74j9-4r6m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  58. 2026-10-06 10:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h85m-74j9-4r6m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  59. 2026-10-06 06:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h85m-74j9-4r6m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  60. 2026-10-06 01:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h85m-74j9-4r6m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  61. 2026-10-05 21:34 UTCEG score recompute
  62. 2026-10-05 21:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h85m-74j9-4r6m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  63. 2026-10-05 17:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
  64. 2026-10-05 17:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h85m-74j9-4r6m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  65. 2026-10-05 12:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h85m-74j9-4r6m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  66. 2026-10-05 08:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h85m-74j9-4r6m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  67. 2026-10-05 04:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h85m-74j9-4r6m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  68. 2026-10-04 23:45 UTCEG score recompute
  69. 2026-10-04 23:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h85m-74j9-4r6m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  70. 2026-10-04 23:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
  71. 2026-10-04 19:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h85m-74j9-4r6m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  72. 2026-10-04 15:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h85m-74j9-4r6m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  73. 2026-10-04 10:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h85m-74j9-4r6m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  74. 2026-10-04 06:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h85m-74j9-4r6m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  75. 2026-10-04 01:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h85m-74j9-4r6m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8

Frequently asked(6)

What is CVE-2018-0167?
CVE-2018-0167 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on March 28, 2018. Multiple Buffer Overflow vulnerabilities in the Link Layer Discovery Protocol (LLDP) subsystem of Cisco IOS Software, Cisco IOS XE Software, and Cisco IOS XR Software could allow an unauthenticated, adjacent attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition or execute arbitrary code with…
When was CVE-2018-0167 made public?
CVE-2018-0167 was made public on March 28, 2018: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, Cisco Systems, Inc., gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on March 28, 2018. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of January 14, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2018-0167 actively exploited?
Yes. CISA added CVE-2018-0167 to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog on March 3, 2022, affecting Cisco IOS, XR, and XE Software. KEV listing indicates confirmed exploitation in the wild; this CVE warrants immediate attention. No fix has been recorded since the CVE record was published in 2018. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation, and check the vendor's advisory for a fix.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2018-0167?
CVE-2018-0167 has a CVSS v3 base score of 8.8 (NVD). EchelonGraph synthesises NVD + CISA KEV + FIRST EPSS + GHSA into a combined EG score of 9.0 (CRITICAL).
Which products are affected by CVE-2018-0167?
CVE-2018-0167 affects Cisco IOS, XR, and XE Software.
How do I remediate CVE-2018-0167?
No fix for CVE-2018-0167 has been recorded since its CVE record was published in 2018. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation — for example, keep it off the internet or limit it to trusted networks — and check the vendor's advisory for a fix.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2018-0167

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2018-0167?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.