CVE-2017-9392

HIGHNVD 8.88.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 8.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2022-05-24. NVD baseline CVSS 8.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
8.8
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: 4%CVSS: 8.8Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

An issue was discovered on Vera VeraEdge 1.7.19 and Veralite 1.7.481 devices. The device provides UPnP services that are available on port 3480 and can also be accessed via port 80 using the url "/port_3480". It seems that the UPnP services provide "request_image" as one of the service actions for a normal user to retrieve an image from a camera that is controlled by the controller. It seems that the "res" (resolution) parameter passed in the query string is not sanitized and is stored on the stack which allows an attacker to overflow the buffer. The function "LU::Generic_IP_Camera_Manager::REQ_Image" is activated when the lu_request_image is passed as the "id" parameter in the query string. This function then calls "LU::Generic_IP_Camera_Manager::GetUrlFromArguments". This function retrieves all the parameters passed in the query string including "res" and then uses the value passed in it to fill up buffer using the sprintf function. However, the function in this case lacks a simple length check and as a result an attacker who is able to send more than 184 characters can easily overflow the values stored on the stack including the $RA value and thus execute code on the device.

CVSS v3
8.8
EG Score
8.8(medium)
EPSS
89.7%
KEV
Not listed

Published

June 17, 2019

Last Modified

November 21, 2024

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 43× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-07-06 16:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-06 16:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-06 02:20 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-06 02:20 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-05 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-04 06:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-04 06:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-02 16:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-01 15:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-06-30 23:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-06-30 23:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-06-29 14:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-06-28 04:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-06-28 04:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-27 03:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-25 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-23 21:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-23 21:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-22 14:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-22 14:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-21 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-21 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-21 01:57 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 43 more
  1. 2026-06-21 01:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-06-18 17:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-06-17 17:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-06-16 17:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-06-15 17:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-06-14 23:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-06-14 23:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-06-13 22:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-06-13 22:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-06-12 23:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-06-12 23:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-06-11 13:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-06-10 22:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-06-10 13:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-08 14:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-08 14:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-07 15:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-07 15:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-05 22:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-05 22:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-05 06:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-05 06:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-04 13:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-04 13:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-02 20:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-02 20:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-01 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-01 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-05-31 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-05-31 00:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-05-31 00:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-05-29 13:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-05-28 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-05-28 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-05-27 18:17 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-05-27 18:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  39. 2026-05-27 13:38 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-05-27 13:38 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-05-26 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-05-26 07:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-05-26 07:17 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2017-9392?
CVE-2017-9392 is a high vulnerability published on June 17, 2019. An issue was discovered on Vera VeraEdge 1.7.19 and Veralite 1.7.481 devices. The device provides UPnP services that are available on port 3480 and can also be accessed via port 80 using the url "/port3480". It seems that the UPnP services provide "requestimage" as one of the service actions for a…
When was CVE-2017-9392 disclosed?
CVE-2017-9392 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on June 17, 2019, with the most recent update on November 21, 2024. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2017-9392 actively exploited?
CVE-2017-9392 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 89.7% percentile likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days — higher percentiles indicate greater predicted risk.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2017-9392?
CVE-2017-9392 has a CVSS v3 base score of 8.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2017-9392?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2017-9392, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2017-9392

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2017-9392?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.