Multiple Cisco products are affected by a vulnerability in local file management for certain system log files of Cisco collaboration products that could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause high disk utilization, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. The vulnerability occurs because a certain system log file does not have a maximum size restriction. Therefore, the file is allowed to consume the majority of available disk space on the appliance. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted remote connection requests to the appliance. Successful exploitation could allow the attacker to increase the size of a system log file so that it consumes most of the disk space. The lack of available disk space could lead to a DoS condition in which the application functions could operate abnormally, making the appliance unstable. This vulnerability affects the following Cisco Voice Operating System (VOS)-based products: Emergency Responder, Finesse, Hosted Collaboration Mediation Fulfillment, MediaSense, Prime License Manager, SocialMiner, Unified Communications Manager (UCM), Unified Communications Manager IM and Presence Service (IM&P - earlier releases were known as Cisco Unified Presence), Unified Communication Manager Session Management Edition (SME), Unified Contact Center Express (UCCx), Unified Intelligence Center (UIC), Unity Connection, Virtualized Voice Browser. This vulnerability also affects Prime Collaboration Assurance and Prime Collaboration Provisioning. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvd10872, CSCvf64322, CSCvf64332, CSCvi29538, CSCvi29543, CSCvi29544, CSCvi29546, CSCvi29556, CSCvi29571, CSCvi31738, CSCvi31741, CSCvi31762, CSCvi31807, CSCvi31818, CSCvi31823.
CVE-2017-6779
Score 7.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2022-05-13. NVD baseline CVSS 7.5; sources differ by 0.0.
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
No fix has been recorded since the CVE record was published in 2018 — isolate the affected system (restrict network access to it, for example with a firewall, or keep it off the internet) or retire the product.
- CVSS v3
- 7.5
- EG Score
- 7.5HIGHmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 50EG Risk 50/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity75% × 45%The EG Score, 7.5 of 10.Exploitation2% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: No fix has been recorded since the CVE record was published in 2018. Isolate the affected system within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (restrict network access to it, for example with a firewall, or keep it off the internet) or retire the product. - EPSS PROB
- 2.0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 80th
- KEV
- Not listed
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
No fix has been recorded since the CVE record was published in 2018. Isolate the affected system within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (restrict network access to it, for example with a firewall, or keep it off the internet) or retire the product.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
Published
June 7, 2018
Last Modified
July 31, 2025
References (1)
- psirt@cisco · CVE Programhttps://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20180606-diskdosVendor Advisory
Weakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 23× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 81 of 135 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 19 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 54 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-11 13:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 80th percentile
- 2026-10-10 19:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 79th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 79th percentile
- 2026-10-08 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 79th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 79th percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 79th percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 79th percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 79th percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 79th percentile
- 2026-09-30 14:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 79th percentile
- 2026-09-30 09:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 79th percentile
- 2026-09-27 13:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 79th percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 79th percentile
- 2026-09-26 00:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 79th percentile
- 2026-09-24 13:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 79th percentile
- 2026-09-23 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 79th percentile
- 2026-09-21 20:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 79th percentile
- 2026-09-20 20:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 79th percentile
- 2026-09-19 15:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 79th percentile
- 2026-09-17 19:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 79th percentile
- 2026-09-15 03:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 79th percentile
- 2026-09-12 14:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 79th percentile
- 2026-09-11 09:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 79th percentile
- 2026-09-07 15:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 79th percentile
Show 56 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-05 15:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 78th percentile
- 2026-09-04 13:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 79th percentile
- 2026-09-04 05:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 79th percentile
- 2026-09-02 14:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 79th percentile
- 2026-09-01 03:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 79th percentile
- 2026-08-30 19:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 79th percentile
- 2026-08-28 21:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 78th percentile
- 2026-08-27 14:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 79th percentile
- 2026-08-26 14:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 79th percentile
- 2026-08-25 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 79th percentile
- 2026-08-23 00:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 79th percentile
- 2026-08-21 23:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 79th percentile
- 2026-08-19 16:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 78th percentile
- 2026-08-18 13:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 78th percentile
- 2026-08-16 14:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 78th percentile
- 2026-08-16 02:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 78th percentile
- 2026-08-15 01:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 78th percentile
- 2026-08-12 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 78th percentile
- 2026-08-08 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 78th percentile
- 2026-08-07 16:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 78th percentile
- 2026-08-06 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 78th percentile
- 2026-08-05 19:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 78th percentile
- 2026-08-02 02:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 78th percentile
- 2026-08-01 04:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 78th percentile
- 2026-07-30 16:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 78th percentile
- 2026-07-30 01:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 78th percentile
- 2026-07-28 15:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 78th percentile
- 2026-07-26 14:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 78th percentile
- 2026-07-23 14:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 78th percentile
- 2026-07-23 01:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 22:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 78th percentile
- 2026-07-21 15:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 78th percentile
- 2026-07-20 17:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 78th percentile
- 2026-07-19 14:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 78th percentile
- 2026-07-19 02:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 78th percentile
- 2026-07-18 10:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 78th percentile
- 2026-07-16 16:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 78th percentile
- 2026-07-15 16:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 78th percentile
- 2026-07-15 01:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 78th percentile
- 2026-07-13 22:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 78th percentile
- 2026-07-12 05:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 78th percentile
- 2026-07-11 08:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 78th percentile
- 2026-07-09 19:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 78th percentile
- 2026-07-08 15:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 78th percentile
- 2026-07-07 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 78th percentile
- 2026-07-06 16:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 78th percentile
- 2026-07-06 02:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 78th percentile
- 2026-07-05 02:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 78th percentile
- 2026-07-04 06:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 78th percentile
- 2026-07-02 16:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 78th percentile
- 2026-07-01 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 78th percentile
- 2026-06-30 23:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 78th percentile
- 2026-06-29 14:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 78th percentile
- 2026-06-28 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 78th percentile
- 2026-06-28 04:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 78th percentile
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2017-6779?
When was CVE-2017-6779 made public?
Is CVE-2017-6779 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2017-6779?
How do I remediate CVE-2017-6779?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2017-6779
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2017-6779?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.