CVE-2017-5070

CRITICALNVD 8.89.0
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

“▲” beside the score: it is higher than NVD's CVSS score.

Score elevated to 9.0 because this CVE is listed on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2022-06-08), indicating real-world exploitation has been confirmed by US federal agencies. NVD baseline CVSS 8.8 retained for reference. The 9.0 is the floor for confirmed exploitation, not an impact rating: this CVE's impact severity (EG Severity) is CVSS 8.8 HIGH under GitHub Security Advisory CVSS. Confidence: HIGH.

Triggered by: CISA KEV (actively exploited)
Sources: CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — 4 sources updated this weekExploited in the wild
9.0EG
EchelonGraph verdictPatch nowTreat as an emergency — this is being exploited.
  • Actively exploited in the wild (CISA-KEV) — the reason this is sooner than the SSVC decision on this page at low or medium mission impact
CISA-KEV: ExploitedEPSS PROB: 32%CVSS: 8.8Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Type confusion in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 59.0.3071.86 for Linux, Windows, and Mac, and 59.0.3071.92 for Android, allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside a sandbox via a crafted HTML page.

CVSS v3
8.8
EG Score
9.0CRITICALhigh confidence
EG Risk
80
EG Risk 80/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity88% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation100% × 40%
Fixed at 100% for a CISA KEV listing: EchelonGraph's rule.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Attend at medium and Act at high mission impact.
Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low, sooner than that at medium and as soon as possible at high mission impact.
EPSS PROB
32%
EPSS %ILE
98th
KEV
⚠ Exploited

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.0 is the CISA KEV floor for confirmed exploitation, not an impact rating: its impact severity (EG Severity) is CVSS 8.8 HIGH.

EG Severity
8.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
32% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-22). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
CISA KEV and EG-KEV Tier 1 (exploited in the wild)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Attend at medium mission impactTrack at low, Attend at medium and Act at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 14 days if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Attend at medium and Act at high mission impact.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low, sooner than that at medium and as soon as possible at high mission impact.

Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 14 days if it is not.

In CISA KEV yes (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

CISA required action“Apply updates per vendor instructions.”

Quoted verbatim from CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. CISA directs it at US federal civilian executive branch agencies under Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 26-04, which replaced BOD 22-01 on 10 June 2026; it is not EchelonGraph's advice. CISA's notes: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-5070

Published

October 27, 2017

Last Modified

June 17, 2026

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Oct 19, 2026
⚠️ Actively exploited (CISA KEV, CISA Vulnrichment). Patch available. Sources: redhat.
Web page

Chrome Releases: Stable Channel Update for Desktop

https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2017/06/stable-channel-update-for-desktop.html
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)

Affected: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Supplementary.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1399
Web page

Chromium: Multiple vulnerabilities (GLSA 201706-20) — Gentoo security

https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201706-20

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatchromium-browser-0:59.0.3071.86-1.el6_92017-06-06redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(1)

Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 27× in last 7d / 310× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 1,954 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 1,854 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-23 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 32% · 98th percentile
  2. 2026-10-23 13:58 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-23 13:58 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-10-23 13:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g97f-3hrx-c447 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  5. 2026-10-22 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 32% · 98th percentile
  6. 2026-10-22 13:10 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-22 13:09 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-10-22 13:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g97f-3hrx-c447 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  9. 2026-10-21 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 32% · 98th percentile
  10. 2026-10-21 12:22 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-21 12:22 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-10-21 12:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g97f-3hrx-c447 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  13. 2026-10-20 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 32% · 98th percentile
  14. 2026-10-20 11:34 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-20 11:34 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-10-20 11:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g97f-3hrx-c447 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  17. 2026-10-19 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 32% · 98th percentile
  18. 2026-10-19 10:44 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-19 10:44 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-10-19 10:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g97f-3hrx-c447 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  21. 2026-10-18 09:57 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-18 09:57 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-10-18 09:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g97f-3hrx-c447 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  24. 2026-10-17 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 32% · 98th percentile
  25. 2026-10-17 09:09 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-17 09:09 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-10-17 09:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g97f-3hrx-c447 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  3. 2026-10-16 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 32% · 98th percentile
  4. 2026-10-16 08:20 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-16 08:20 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-10-16 08:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g97f-3hrx-c447 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  7. 2026-10-15 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 32% · 98th percentile
  8. 2026-10-15 07:31 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-15 07:31 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-10-15 07:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g97f-3hrx-c447 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  11. 2026-10-14 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 32% · 98th percentile
  12. 2026-10-14 06:42 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-14 06:42 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-10-14 06:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g97f-3hrx-c447 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  15. 2026-10-13 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 32% · 98th percentile
  16. 2026-10-13 05:53 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-10-13 05:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g97f-3hrx-c447 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  18. 2026-10-12 20:28 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-12 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 32% · 98th percentile
  20. 2026-10-12 05:05 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-10-12 05:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g97f-3hrx-c447 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  22. 2026-10-12 01:13 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-10-12 01:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g97f-3hrx-c447 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  24. 2026-10-11 21:22 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-11 21:22 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-10-11 21:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g97f-3hrx-c447 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  27. 2026-10-11 17:30 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-10-11 17:30 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-10-11 17:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g97f-3hrx-c447 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  30. 2026-10-11 13:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 32% · 98th percentile
  31. 2026-10-11 13:36 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-10-11 13:36 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-10-11 13:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g97f-3hrx-c447 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  34. 2026-10-11 09:44 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-10-11 09:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g97f-3hrx-c447 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  36. 2026-10-11 05:54 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-10-11 05:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g97f-3hrx-c447 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  38. 2026-10-11 02:05 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-10-11 02:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g97f-3hrx-c447 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  40. 2026-10-10 22:12 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-10-10 22:12 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-10-10 22:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g97f-3hrx-c447 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  43. 2026-10-10 19:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 32% · 98th percentile
  44. 2026-10-10 18:22 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-10-10 18:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g97f-3hrx-c447 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  46. 2026-10-10 14:33 UTCVendor advisory
  47. 2026-10-10 14:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g97f-3hrx-c447 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  48. 2026-10-10 10:42 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-10-10 10:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g97f-3hrx-c447 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  50. 2026-10-10 06:51 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-10-10 06:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g97f-3hrx-c447 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  52. 2026-10-10 03:02 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-10-10 03:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g97f-3hrx-c447 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  54. 2026-10-09 23:12 UTCEG score recompute
  55. 2026-10-09 23:12 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-10-09 23:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g97f-3hrx-c447 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  57. 2026-10-09 20:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 32% · 98th percentile
  58. 2026-10-09 19:22 UTCVendor advisory
  59. 2026-10-09 19:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g97f-3hrx-c447 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  60. 2026-10-09 15:31 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-10-09 15:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g97f-3hrx-c447 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  62. 2026-10-09 11:41 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-10-09 11:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g97f-3hrx-c447 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  64. 2026-10-09 07:50 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-10-09 07:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g97f-3hrx-c447 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  66. 2026-10-09 04:00 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-10-09 04:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g97f-3hrx-c447 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  68. 2026-10-09 00:09 UTCVendor advisory
  69. 2026-10-09 00:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g97f-3hrx-c447 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  70. 2026-10-08 20:19 UTCEG score recompute
  71. 2026-10-08 20:19 UTCVendor advisory
  72. 2026-10-08 20:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g97f-3hrx-c447 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  73. 2026-10-08 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 32% · 98th percentile
  74. 2026-10-08 16:28 UTCVendor advisory
  75. 2026-10-08 16:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g97f-3hrx-c447 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8

Frequently asked(6)

What is CVE-2017-5070?
CVE-2017-5070 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on October 27, 2017. Type confusion in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 59.0.3071.86 for Linux, Windows, and Mac, and 59.0.3071.92 for Android, allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside a sandbox via a crafted HTML page.
When was CVE-2017-5070 made public?
CVE-2017-5070 was made public on June 5, 2017: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, Chrome, gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on October 27, 2017. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of June 17, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2017-5070 actively exploited?
Yes. CISA added CVE-2017-5070 to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog on June 8, 2022, affecting Google Chromium V8. KEV listing indicates confirmed exploitation in the wild; this CVE warrants immediate attention. A fix is available. Apply it.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2017-5070?
CVE-2017-5070 has a CVSS v3 base score of 8.8 (NVD). EchelonGraph synthesises NVD + CISA KEV + FIRST EPSS + GHSA into a combined EG score of 9.0 (CRITICAL).
Which products are affected by CVE-2017-5070?
CVE-2017-5070 affects Google Chromium V8.
How do I remediate CVE-2017-5070?
A fix for CVE-2017-5070 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2017-5070

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2017-5070?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.