CVE-2017-2592

MEDIUMNVD 5.95.9
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

This medium-severity CVE scores 5.9 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.4% (36th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from NVD CVSS v3
Sources: EPSS, NVD CVSS v3
5.9EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.4%CVSS: 5.9Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

python-oslo-middleware before versions 3.8.1, 3.19.1, 3.23.1 is vulnerable to an information disclosure. Software using the CatchError class could include sensitive values in a traceback's error message. System users could exploit this flaw to obtain sensitive information from OpenStack component error logs (for example, keystone tokens).

CVSS v3
5.9
EG Score
5.9MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
27
EG Risk 27/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity59% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 5.9 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.4% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.4%
EPSS %ILE
36th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (5.9): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.9 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
5.9 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.NVD CVSS v3 · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
EG Likelihood
0.4% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-17). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

May 8, 2018

Last Modified

November 21, 2024

References (12)

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2017-2592(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(3)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntupython3-oslo.middleware (3.8.0-2ubuntu1) @ xenial2026-05-28ubuntu
redhatpython-oslo-middleware-0:3.7.0-2.el7ost2017-03-02redhat
redhatpython-oslo-middleware-0:3.19.0-1.2.el7ost2017-02-22redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(5 across 5 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
python-oslo.middleware—
  • every version up to 3.19.0-3: fixed in 3.19.0-3
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
python-oslo.middleware—
  • every version up to 3.19.0-3: fixed in 3.19.0-3
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
python-oslo.middleware—
  • every version up to 3.19.0-3: fixed in 3.19.0-3
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
python-oslo.middleware—
  • every version up to 3.19.0-3: fixed in 3.19.0-3
—
PyPI(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
oslo-middleware0.1.0 ... 3.9.0 (46 versions)
  • 3.9.0 up to 3.19.1: fixed in 3.19.1
  • every version up to 3.8.1: fixed in 3.8.1
  • 3.20.0 up to 3.23.1: fixed in 3.23.1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(1)

Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 26× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 89 of 150 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 11 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 61 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-18 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  2. 2026-10-18 10:32 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-17 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  4. 2026-10-16 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
  5. 2026-10-15 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
  6. 2026-10-14 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
  7. 2026-10-13 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
  8. 2026-10-12 20:29 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-12 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
  10. 2026-10-12 00:52 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-11 13:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
  12. 2026-10-10 19:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
  13. 2026-10-09 20:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
  14. 2026-10-08 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
  15. 2026-10-07 23:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
  16. 2026-10-06 15:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
  17. 2026-10-05 17:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  18. 2026-10-04 23:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  19. 2026-10-03 14:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  20. 2026-09-30 14:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  21. 2026-09-30 09:32 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-09-29 05:02 UTCOSV refresh
  23. 2026-09-28 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  24. 2026-09-27 13:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  25. 2026-09-26 15:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
Show 64 more
  1. 2026-09-24 13:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  2. 2026-09-18 19:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 38th percentile
  3. 2026-09-17 19:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 38th percentile
  4. 2026-09-15 03:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 38th percentile
  5. 2026-09-13 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  6. 2026-09-12 14:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  7. 2026-09-11 09:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  8. 2026-09-09 09:23 UTCOSV refresh
  9. 2026-09-07 15:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  10. 2026-09-06 13:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  11. 2026-09-05 15:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  12. 2026-09-04 13:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  13. 2026-09-02 14:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  14. 2026-09-01 03:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  15. 2026-08-30 19:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  16. 2026-08-27 14:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  17. 2026-08-26 14:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  18. 2026-08-25 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  19. 2026-08-22 18:07 UTCOSV refresh
  20. 2026-08-21 23:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  21. 2026-08-20 22:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  22. 2026-08-19 16:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  23. 2026-08-18 13:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  24. 2026-08-17 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  25. 2026-08-16 14:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  26. 2026-08-16 02:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  27. 2026-08-15 01:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  28. 2026-08-12 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  29. 2026-08-09 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  30. 2026-08-07 16:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  31. 2026-08-06 22:03 UTCOSV refresh
  32. 2026-08-06 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  33. 2026-08-05 19:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  34. 2026-08-04 15:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  35. 2026-08-02 02:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  36. 2026-08-01 04:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  37. 2026-07-30 16:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  38. 2026-07-30 01:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
  39. 2026-07-28 15:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
  40. 2026-07-26 14:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
  41. 2026-07-23 14:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
  42. 2026-07-23 01:29 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-07-22 22:08 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-07-22 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
  45. 2026-07-21 15:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
  46. 2026-07-21 13:18 UTCOSV refresh
  47. 2026-07-20 17:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
  48. 2026-07-19 14:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
  49. 2026-07-19 02:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
  50. 2026-07-18 10:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
  51. 2026-07-16 16:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
  52. 2026-07-15 16:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
  53. 2026-07-15 01:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
  54. 2026-07-13 22:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
  55. 2026-07-12 05:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
  56. 2026-07-11 08:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
  57. 2026-07-09 19:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
  58. 2026-07-08 15:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
  59. 2026-07-07 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
  60. 2026-07-06 16:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
  61. 2026-07-06 02:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
  62. 2026-07-05 02:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
  63. 2026-07-04 08:56 UTCOSV refresh
  64. 2026-07-04 06:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2017-2592?
CVE-2017-2592 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on May 8, 2018. python-oslo-middleware before versions 3.8.1, 3.19.1, 3.23.1 is vulnerable to an information disclosure. Software using the CatchError class could include sensitive values in a traceback's error message. System users could exploit this flaw to obtain sensitive information from OpenStack component…
When was CVE-2017-2592 made public?
CVE-2017-2592 was made public on January 26, 2017: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, Red Hat, Inc., gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on May 8, 2018. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 21, 2024; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2017-2592 actively exploited?
CVE-2017-2592 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.4% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (36th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2017-2592?
CVE-2017-2592 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.9 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2017-2592?
A fix for CVE-2017-2592 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2017-2592 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2017-2592

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2017-2592?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.