coders/wpg.c in GraphicsMagick 1.3.26 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (heap-based buffer overflow and application crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted file, related to the AcquireCacheNexus function in magick/pixel_cache.c.
CVE-2017-16669
“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.
Score 8.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2022-05-13. NVD baseline CVSS 8.8; sources differ by 0.0.
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 8.8
- EG Score
- 8.8HIGHmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 41EG Risk 41/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity88% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation3.4% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 3.4%
- EPSS %ILE
- 88th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (8.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 8.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 8.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 3.4% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-21). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
November 9, 2017
Last Modified
June 17, 2026
Advisory Details (10)
Auto-updated Aug 16, 2026[SECURITY] [DLA 1168-1] graphicsmagick security update
https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2017/11/msg00013.htmlMercurial Repository: p/graphicsmagick/code: changeset 15248:fcd3ed3394f6
http://hg.code.sf.net/p/graphicsmagick/code/rev/fcd3ed3394f6Mercurial Repository: p/graphicsmagick/code: changeset 15245:e8086faa52d0
http://hg.code.sf.net/p/graphicsmagick/code/rev/e8086faa52d0Mercurial Repository: p/graphicsmagick/code: changeset 15247:75245a215fff
http://hg.code.sf.net/p/graphicsmagick/code/rev/75245a215fffMercurial Repository: p/graphicsmagick/code: changeset 15161:3dc7b4e3779d
http://hg.code.sf.net/p/graphicsmagick/code/rev/3dc7b4e3779dMercurial Repository: p/graphicsmagick/code: changeset 15246:2b7c826d36af
http://hg.code.sf.net/p/graphicsmagick/code/rev/2b7c826d36afMercurial Repository: p/graphicsmagick/code: changeset 15250:2a21cda3145b
http://hg.code.sf.net/p/graphicsmagick/code/rev/2a21cda3145bMercurial Repository: p/graphicsmagick/code: changeset 15251:1b9e64a8901e
http://hg.code.sf.net/p/graphicsmagick/code/rev/1b9e64a8901eMercurial Repository: p/graphicsmagick/code: changeset 15249:135bdcb88b8d
http://hg.code.sf.net/p/graphicsmagick/code/rev/135bdcb88b8dPatch Availability(1)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| ubuntu | libgraphicsmagick1-dev (1.3.23-1ubuntu0.5) @ xenial | 2026-10-22 | ubuntu |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(7 across 7 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| graphicsmagick | — |
| — |
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| graphicsmagick | — |
| — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| graphicsmagick | — |
| — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| graphicsmagick | — |
| — |
Debian:7(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| graphicsmagick | 1.3.16-1.1 ... 1.3.16-1.1+deb7u9 (14 versions) |
| — |
Debian:8(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| graphicsmagick | 1.3.20-3+deb8u1, 1.3.20-3+deb8u2 |
| — |
Debian:9(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| graphicsmagick | 1.3.25-8 ... 1.3.30-1 (29 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
All Vendor Advisories
(1)
Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 33× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 94 of 169 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 6 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 75 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-23 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-10-22 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-10-22 03:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-22 03:40 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-22 03:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4vcq-r7hf-36w7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-10-21 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-10-20 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-10-19 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-10-18 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-10-18 10:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-10-16 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-10-15 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-10-14 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-10-13 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-10-12 20:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-10-12 00:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-10-10 19:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-10-08 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-10-07 22:05 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-10-06 15:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
Show 69 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-05 17:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-09-30 14:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-09-30 09:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-09-27 13:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-09-24 13:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-09-19 15:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-09-18 19:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-09-18 04:06 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-17 19:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-09-15 03:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-09-12 14:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-09-11 09:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-09-10 09:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-09-07 15:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-09-04 13:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-09-04 05:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-09-02 14:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-09-01 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 87th percentile
- 2026-09-01 03:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 87th percentile
- 2026-08-30 19:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 87th percentile
- 2026-08-30 04:48 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-28 21:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
- 2026-08-27 14:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 87th percentile
- 2026-08-26 14:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 87th percentile
- 2026-08-25 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 87th percentile
- 2026-08-24 14:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 87th percentile
- 2026-08-21 23:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 87th percentile
- 2026-08-20 22:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 87th percentile
- 2026-08-19 16:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 87th percentile
- 2026-08-18 13:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 87th percentile
- 2026-08-16 14:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 87th percentile
- 2026-08-16 02:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 87th percentile
- 2026-08-15 01:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 87th percentile
- 2026-08-13 21:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 87th percentile
- 2026-08-13 18:21 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-09 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 87th percentile
- 2026-08-08 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 87th percentile
- 2026-08-07 16:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 87th percentile
- 2026-08-06 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 87th percentile
- 2026-08-05 19:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 87th percentile
- 2026-08-04 15:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 87th percentile
- 2026-08-04 10:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 87th percentile
- 2026-08-03 10:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 87th percentile
- 2026-08-02 02:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 87th percentile
- 2026-08-01 04:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 87th percentile
- 2026-07-30 16:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 87th percentile
- 2026-07-30 01:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 87th percentile
- 2026-07-28 22:51 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-07-28 15:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 87th percentile
- 2026-07-26 14:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 87th percentile
- 2026-07-25 14:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 87th percentile
- 2026-07-23 14:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 87th percentile
- 2026-07-23 01:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 22:07 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 87th percentile
- 2026-07-21 15:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 87th percentile
- 2026-07-20 17:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 87th percentile
- 2026-07-19 14:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 87th percentile
- 2026-07-19 02:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 87th percentile
- 2026-07-18 10:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 87th percentile
- 2026-07-16 16:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 87th percentile
- 2026-07-15 16:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 87th percentile
- 2026-07-15 01:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 87th percentile
- 2026-07-13 22:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 87th percentile
- 2026-07-12 05:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 87th percentile
- 2026-07-11 15:22 UTCOSV refresh
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownDebian:9:graphicsmagick
Same vendor
9 shownubuntu:USN-4248-1
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2017-16669?
When was CVE-2017-16669 made public?
Is CVE-2017-16669 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2017-16669?
How do I remediate CVE-2017-16669?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2017-16669
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2017-16669?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.