The Amcrest IPM-721S Amcrest_IPC-AWXX_Eng_N_V2.420.AC00.17.R.20170322 allows HTTP requests that permit enabling various functionalities of the camera by using HTTP APIs, instead of the web management interface that is provided by the application. This HTTP API receives the credentials as base64 encoded in the Authorization HTTP header. However, a missing length check in the code allows an attacker to send a string of 1024 characters in the password field, and allows an attacker to exploit a memory corruption issue. This can allow an attacker to circumvent the account protection mechanism and brute force the credentials. If the firmware version Amcrest_IPC-AWXX_Eng_N_V2.420.AC00.17.R.20170322 is dissected using the binwalk tool, one obtains a _user-x.squashfs.img.extracted archive which contains the filesystem set up on the device that has many of the binaries in the /usr folder. The binary "sonia" is the one that has the vulnerable function that performs the credential check in the binary for the HTTP API specification. If we open this binary in IDA Pro we will notice that this follows an ARM little-endian format. The function at address 00415364 in IDA Pro starts the HTTP authentication process. This function calls another function at sub_ 0042CCA0 at address 0041549C. This function performs a strchr operation after base64 decoding the credentials, and stores the result on the stack, which results in a stack-based buffer overflow.
CVE-2017-13719
“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.
Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2022-05-24. NVD baseline CVSS 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
No fix has been recorded since the CVE record was published in 2019 — if the vendor still supports the product, apply the fixed version it names; if not, isolate the affected system (restrict network access to it, for example with a firewall, or keep it off the internet) or retire the product.
- CVSS v3
- 9.8
- EG Score
- 9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 46EG Risk 46/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity98% × 45%The EG Score, 9.8 of 10.Exploitation4.5% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: No fix has been recorded since the CVE record was published in 2019. If the vendor still supports the product, apply the fixed version it names within your standard update timelines; if it no longer does, isolate the affected system (restrict network access to it, for example with a firewall, or keep it off the internet) or retire the product. - EPSS PROB
- 4.5%
- EPSS %ILE
- 91st
- KEV
- Not listed
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
No fix has been recorded since the CVE record was published in 2019. If the vendor still supports the product, apply the fixed version it names within your standard update timelines; if it no longer does, isolate the affected system (restrict network access to it, for example with a firewall, or keep it off the internet) or retire the product.
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
July 3, 2019
Last Modified
November 21, 2024
Advisory Details (3)
Auto-updated Oct 7, 2026IoT_vulnerabilities/Amcrest_sec_issues.pdf at master · ethanhunnt/IoT_vulnerabilities · GitHub
https://github.com/ethanhunnt/IoT_vulnerabilities/blob/master/Amcrest_sec_issues.pdfWeakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 12× in last 7d / 26× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 92 of 137 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 8 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 45 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-14 00:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-14 00:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xpwc-9c3w-mmc4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-13 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 91st percentile
- 2026-10-12 20:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xpwc-9c3w-mmc4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-12 20:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 91st percentile
- 2026-10-12 00:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 91st percentile
- 2026-10-10 19:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 91st percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 91st percentile
- 2026-10-08 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 91st percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 91st percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 91st percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 91st percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 91st percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 91st percentile
- 2026-09-30 14:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 91st percentile
- 2026-09-30 09:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 91st percentile
- 2026-09-27 13:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 91st percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 91st percentile
- 2026-09-24 13:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 91st percentile
- 2026-09-19 15:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 90th percentile
- 2026-09-18 19:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 90th percentile
- 2026-09-17 19:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 90th percentile
Show 67 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-15 03:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 90th percentile
- 2026-09-12 14:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 90th percentile
- 2026-09-11 09:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 90th percentile
- 2026-09-10 09:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 90th percentile
- 2026-09-07 15:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 90th percentile
- 2026-09-04 13:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 90th percentile
- 2026-09-04 05:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 90th percentile
- 2026-09-02 14:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 90th percentile
- 2026-09-01 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 90th percentile
- 2026-09-01 03:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 90th percentile
- 2026-08-30 19:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 90th percentile
- 2026-08-28 21:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 87th percentile
- 2026-08-27 14:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 90th percentile
- 2026-08-26 14:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 90th percentile
- 2026-08-25 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 90th percentile
- 2026-08-24 14:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 90th percentile
- 2026-08-21 23:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 90th percentile
- 2026-08-20 22:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 90th percentile
- 2026-08-19 16:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 90th percentile
- 2026-08-18 13:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 90th percentile
- 2026-08-17 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 90th percentile
- 2026-08-16 14:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 90th percentile
- 2026-08-16 02:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 90th percentile
- 2026-08-15 01:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 90th percentile
- 2026-08-13 21:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 90th percentile
- 2026-08-09 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 90th percentile
- 2026-08-08 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 90th percentile
- 2026-08-07 16:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 90th percentile
- 2026-08-06 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 90th percentile
- 2026-08-05 19:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 90th percentile
- 2026-08-04 15:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 90th percentile
- 2026-08-04 10:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 90th percentile
- 2026-08-03 10:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 90th percentile
- 2026-08-02 02:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 90th percentile
- 2026-08-01 04:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 90th percentile
- 2026-07-30 16:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 90th percentile
- 2026-07-30 01:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 90th percentile
- 2026-07-28 15:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 90th percentile
- 2026-07-25 14:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 90th percentile
- 2026-07-23 14:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 90th percentile
- 2026-07-23 01:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 22:06 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 90th percentile
- 2026-07-21 15:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 90th percentile
- 2026-07-20 17:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 90th percentile
- 2026-07-19 14:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 90th percentile
- 2026-07-19 02:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 90th percentile
- 2026-07-18 10:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 90th percentile
- 2026-07-16 16:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 90th percentile
- 2026-07-15 16:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 90th percentile
- 2026-07-15 01:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 90th percentile
- 2026-07-13 22:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 90th percentile
- 2026-07-13 06:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 90th percentile
- 2026-07-12 05:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 90th percentile
- 2026-07-11 08:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 90th percentile
- 2026-07-09 19:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 90th percentile
- 2026-07-08 15:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 90th percentile
- 2026-07-07 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 90th percentile
- 2026-07-06 16:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 90th percentile
- 2026-07-06 02:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 90th percentile
- 2026-07-05 02:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 90th percentile
- 2026-07-04 06:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 90th percentile
- 2026-07-01 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 90th percentile
- 2026-06-30 23:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 90th percentile
- 2026-06-29 14:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 90th percentile
- 2026-06-28 04:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 90th percentile
- 2026-06-27 03:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.5% · 90th percentile
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2017-13719?
When was CVE-2017-13719 made public?
Is CVE-2017-13719 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2017-13719?
How do I remediate CVE-2017-13719?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2017-13719
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2017-13719?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.