Remote code execution is possible with Apache Tomcat before 6.0.48, 7.x before 7.0.73, 8.x before 8.0.39, 8.5.x before 8.5.7, and 9.x before 9.0.0.M12 if JmxRemoteLifecycleListener is used and an attacker can reach JMX ports. The issue exists because this listener wasn't updated for consistency with the CVE-2016-3427 Oracle patch that affected credential types.
CVE-2016-8735
Score elevated to 9.8 because this CVE is listed on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2023-05-12), indicating real-world exploitation has been confirmed by US federal agencies. NVD baseline CVSS 9.8 retained for reference. Confidence: HIGH.
- 5,576 internet-facing services (distinct ip:port) on record running an affected version — derived from Shodan data (© Shodan); a patched service can stay counted while its port stays open
- Actively exploited in the wild (CISA-KEV)
A fix is available — apply it.
5,576 internet-facing services (distinct ip:port) on record running a version that maps to CVE-2016-8735, in our KEV-Exposure radar’s Shodan-derived sample.
How it counts: every 12 hours, when Shodan query credits allow, the radar runs one Shodan query per tracked product, reads up to 100 ip:port services per query, and keeps a service when its banner version matches a CISA-KEV or high-EPSS CVE; a service is dropped when neither a search nor a Shodan InternetDB port re-check has refreshed it for 21 days. A re-check that finds the port still listed by Shodan InternetDB refreshes the service without re-reading the banner, so a patched service can stay counted while its port stays open. A count is a banner-version inference over a sample, not an exploit test and not an internet-wide census, and the unit is a service, not a machine: a machine answering on two ports counts twice.
- CVSS v3
- 9.8
- EG Score
- 9.8CRITICALhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 99EG Risk 99/100CISA SSVC
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity98% × 45%Exploitation100% × 40%Automatability100% × 15%CISA SSVC: Attend at low mission impact; Act at medium or high.Action: A fix is available. Apply it sooner than your standard update timelines at low mission impact and as soon as possible at medium or high. - EPSS PROB
- 90%
- EPSS %ILE
- 99th
- KEV
- ⚠ Exploited
CISA SSVCAttend at low mission impact; Act at medium or high.
A fix is available. Apply it sooner than your standard update timelines at low mission impact and as soon as possible at medium or high.
Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table
Published
April 6, 2017
Last Modified
August 25, 2026
Advisory Details (6)
Auto-updated Oct 7, 2026oss-sec: [SECURITY] CVE-2016-8735 Apache Tomcat Remote Code Execution
http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2016/q4/502Patch Availability(6)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| ubuntu | tomcat8 (8.0.37-1ubuntu0.1) @ yakkety | 2026-10-11 | ubuntu |
| ubuntu | tomcat6-user (6.0.39-1ubuntu0.1+esm2) @ trusty | 2026-10-11 | ubuntu |
| ubuntu | libservlet2.5-java-doc (6.0.45+dfsg-1ubuntu0.1) @ xenial | 2026-10-11 | ubuntu |
| redhat | patch | 2017-03-07 | redhat |
| redhat | tomcat-vault-0:1.0.8-9.Final_redhat_2.1.ep7.el7 | 2017-03-07 | redhat |
| redhat | tomcat-vault-0:1.0.8-9.Final_redhat_2.1.ep7.el6 | 2017-03-07 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(6 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:7(2)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| tomcat6 | 6.0.35-6 ... 6.0.45-1~deb6u1 (15 versions) |
| — |
| tomcat7 | 7.0.28-4 ... 7.0.28-4+deb7u6 (7 versions) |
| — |
Debian:8(2)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| tomcat7 | 7.0.56-3 ... 7.0.56-3+deb8u5 (6 versions) |
| — |
| tomcat8 | 8.0.14-1, 8.0.14-1+deb8u1, 8.0.14-1+deb8u2, 8.0.14-1+deb8u3, 8.0.14-1+deb8u4 |
| — |
Maven(2)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| org.apache.tomcat:tomcat-catalina | 9.0.0.M1 ... 9.0.0.M9 (8 versions) |
| — |
| org.apache.tomcat:tomcat-catalina-jmx-remote | 9.0.0.M1 ... 9.0.0.M9 (8 versions) |
| — |
All Vendor Advisories
(6)
Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.
- Red HatRHSA-2017:0455IMPORTANT2016-11-22
RHSA-2017:0455 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2017:0456IMPORTANT2016-11-22
RHSA-2017:0456 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2017:0457IMPORTANT2016-11-22
RHSA-2017:0457 — Important
- UbuntuUSN-3177-1HIGH
Tomcat vulnerabilities
- UbuntuUSN-4557-1HIGH
Tomcat vulnerabilities
- UbuntuUSN-7242-1HIGH
Tomcat vulnerability
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 42× in last 7d / 195× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 878 total refreshes for this CVE.
- 2026-10-11 00:13 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 19:52 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 15:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 11:11 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 06:52 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 02:34 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 22:15 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 17:56 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 13:35 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 09:16 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 04:57 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 00:37 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-08 20:19 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-08 16:00 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-08 11:41 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-08 07:22 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-08 03:03 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-08 03:03 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 23:40 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-07 22:44 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 18:25 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 14:05 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 09:43 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 05:24 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 01:05 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-06 20:46 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 16:28 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 12:09 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 07:50 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 03:31 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 03:30 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 23:11 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 18:51 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 14:31 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 10:13 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 05:53 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 01:33 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 21:14 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 16:55 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 12:35 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 08:16 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 03:57 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 23:38 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 19:18 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 14:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-03 14:59 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 14:21 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-03 14:21 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-03 10:40 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 06:21 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 02:02 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 21:43 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 17:25 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 13:04 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 08:45 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 04:26 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 00:04 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 19:46 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 15:26 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 11:08 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 06:46 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 02:26 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 22:08 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 17:49 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 13:31 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 09:11 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 04:53 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 00:34 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-29 20:13 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-29 15:51 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-29 11:33 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-29 07:14 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-29 02:55 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-28 22:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 22:36 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-28 18:18 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-28 13:59 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-28 09:40 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-28 05:22 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-28 01:03 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-27 21:51 UTCCISA KEV update
- 2026-09-27 20:44 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-27 16:25 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-27 12:07 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-27 07:48 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-27 03:29 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-26 23:08 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-26 18:47 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-26 14:28 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-26 10:07 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-26 05:45 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-26 01:24 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-25 21:05 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-25 19:35 UTCCISA KEV update
- 2026-09-25 16:46 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-25 14:55 UTCCISA KEV update
- 2026-09-25 12:27 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-25 08:09 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-25 03:50 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-24 23:31 UTCVendor advisory
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor)
Same product
10 shownDebian:7:tomcat6
- CVE-2016-5018EG 9.1EPSS p96CRITICAL
- CVE-2016-0714EG 8.8EPSS p96HIGH
- CVE-2015-5351EG 8.8EPSS p95HIGH
- CVE-2015-5346EG 8.1EPSS p96HIGH
- CVE-2016-9775EG 7.8HIGH
- CVE-2016-9774EG 7.8HIGH
- CVE-2016-1240EG 7.8EPSS p95HIGH
- CVE-2016-6796EG 7.5EPSS p95HIGH
- CVE-2016-6797EG 7.5EPSS p95HIGH
- CVE-2016-6816NVD 7.1EG 7.4EPSS p99HIGH
Same vendor
10 shownredhat:RHSA-2017:0455
- CVE-2016-5018EG 9.1EPSS p96CRITICAL
- CVE-2016-6796EG 7.5EPSS p95HIGH
- CVE-2016-6797EG 7.5EPSS p95HIGH
- CVE-2016-6816NVD 7.1EG 7.4EPSS p99HIGH
- CVE-2016-0762EG 5.9EPSS p95MEDIUM
- CVE-2016-6794EG 5.3EPSS p94MEDIUM
- CVE-2016-8745EG 7.5EPSS p97HIGH
- CVE-2016-6325EG 7.8HIGH
- CVE-2016-1240EG 7.8EPSS p95HIGH
- CVE-2016-3092NVD 7.5EG 7.7EPSS p98HIGH
Frequently asked(6)
What is CVE-2016-8735?
When was CVE-2016-8735 disclosed?
Is CVE-2016-8735 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2016-8735?
Which products are affected by CVE-2016-8735?
How do I remediate CVE-2016-8735?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2016-8735
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2016-8735?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.