The Chakra JavaScript scripting engine in Microsoft Edge allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption) via a crafted web site, aka "Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability," a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-7200, CVE-2016-7202, CVE-2016-7203, CVE-2016-7208, CVE-2016-7240, CVE-2016-7242, and CVE-2016-7243.
CVE-2016-7201
Score elevated to 9.0 because this CVE is listed on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2022-03-28), indicating real-world exploitation has been confirmed by US federal agencies. NVD baseline CVSS 8.8 retained for reference. Confidence: HIGH.
- Actively exploited in the wild (CISA-KEV)
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 8.8
- EG Score
- 9.0CRITICALhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 81EG Risk 81/100CISA SSVC
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity90% × 45%Exploitation100% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%CISA SSVC: Track at low, Attend at medium and Act at high mission impact.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low, sooner than that at medium and as soon as possible at high mission impact. - EPSS PROB
- 80%
- EPSS %ILE
- 99th
- KEV
- ⚠ Exploited
CISA SSVCTrack at low, Attend at medium and Act at high mission impact.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low, sooner than that at medium and as soon as possible at high mission impact.
Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table
Published
November 10, 2016
Last Modified
June 17, 2026
Advisory Details (5)
Auto-updated May 2, 2026Microsoft Edge (Windows 10) - 'chakra.dll' Information Leak / Type Confusion Remote Code Execution - Windows remote Exploit
https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/40990/Microsoft Edge - 'FillFromPrototypes' Type Confusion - Windows dos Exploit
https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/40784/GitHub - theori-io/chakra-2016-11: Proof-of-Concept exploit for Edge bugs (CVE-2016-7200 & CVE-2016-7201) · GitHub
https://github.com/theori-io/chakra-2016-11Microsoft Security Bulletin MS16-129 - Critical | Microsoft Learn
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2016/ms16-129Vendor Advisories for CVE-2016-7201(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Affected Packages
(1 across 1 ecosystem)
NuGet(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft.ChakraCore | 1.2.0, 1.2.1 |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 51× in last 7d / 219× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 905 total refreshes for this CVE.
- 2026-10-10 10:11 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 06:06 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 02:05 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 22:04 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-09 22:04 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 20:01 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-09 18:02 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 14:00 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 09:57 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 05:55 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 01:53 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-08 21:51 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-08 17:50 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-08 13:40 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-08 09:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-08 05:31 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-08 01:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-08 01:30 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 23:40 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-07 21:28 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 17:27 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 13:25 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 09:23 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 05:22 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 01:21 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-06 21:19 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 17:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-06 17:18 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 15:11 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-06 13:17 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 09:15 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 05:14 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 01:11 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 21:05 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 17:03 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 13:02 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 09:00 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 04:59 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 00:57 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 20:54 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 16:52 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 12:50 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 08:48 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 04:46 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 00:45 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 20:43 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 16:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-03 16:41 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 14:21 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-03 14:21 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-03 12:40 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 08:39 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 04:36 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 00:34 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 20:33 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 16:27 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 16:26 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 12:24 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 08:22 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 04:21 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 00:18 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 20:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 20:17 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 16:13 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 12:12 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 08:10 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 04:09 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 00:07 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 20:06 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 16:04 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 12:00 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 07:59 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 03:57 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-29 23:56 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-29 19:53 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-29 15:48 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-29 11:45 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-29 07:41 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-29 03:39 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-28 23:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 23:36 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-28 19:35 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-28 15:30 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-28 11:28 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-28 07:27 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-28 03:26 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-27 23:24 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-27 21:51 UTCCISA KEV update
- 2026-09-27 19:22 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-27 15:20 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-27 11:18 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-27 07:15 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-27 03:14 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-26 23:12 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-26 19:06 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-26 19:06 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-26 15:53 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-26 15:53 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-26 15:03 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-26 11:02 UTCVendor advisory
Publicly available exploits
(2 references)Working exploit code is in the public domain (2 Exploit-DB entries). Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly — public PoCs typically lead to mass-exploitation within 24-72 hours.
- Exploit-DBEDB-40784✓ verifiedFirst seen Nov 18, 2016
Microsoft Edge - 'FillFromPrototypes' Type Confusion
Open source ↗ - Exploit-DBEDB-40990First seen Jan 5, 2017
Microsoft Edge (Windows 10) - 'chakra.dll' Information Leak / Type Confusion Remote Code Execution
Open source ↗
Related CVEs(same product + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownNuGet:Microsoft.ChakraCore
- CVE-2018-8500EG 9.8EPSS p97CRITICAL
- CVE-2017-11767EG 9.8EPSS p95CRITICAL
- CVE-2017-8658EG 9.8EPSS p97CRITICAL
- CVE-2017-0252EG 9.8EPSS p96CRITICAL
- CVE-2017-0223EG 9.8EPSS p97CRITICAL
- CVE-2018-8298NVD 7.5EG 9.0 KEVEPSS p99CRITICAL
- CVE-2016-7200NVD 8.8EG 9.0 KEVEPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2019-0567NVD 7.5EG 8.9EPSS p100HIGH
- CVE-2019-0539NVD 7.5EG 8.9EPSS p100HIGH
- CVE-2019-1140EG 8.8EPSS p90HIGH
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-843
- CVE-2016-6992NVD 8.8EG 9.8EPSS p93CRITICAL
- CVE-2017-2995EG 8.8EPSS p94HIGH
- CVE-2017-0037NVD 8.1EG 9.0 KEVEPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2016-4225EG 8.8EPSS p94HIGH
- CVE-2016-4224EG 8.8EPSS p94HIGH
- CVE-2016-4223EG 8.8EPSS p94HIGH
- CVE-2016-4149EG 8.8EPSS p90HIGH
- CVE-2017-8291NVD 7.8EG 9.0 KEVEPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2016-1015EG 8.8EPSS p94HIGH
- CVE-2016-0985EG 8.8EPSS p98HIGH
Frequently asked(6)
What is CVE-2016-7201?
When was CVE-2016-7201 disclosed?
Is CVE-2016-7201 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2016-7201?
Which products are affected by CVE-2016-7201?
How do I remediate CVE-2016-7201?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2016-7201
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2016-7201?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.