client_side.cc in Squid before 3.5.18 and 4.x before 4.0.10 does not properly ignore the Host header when absolute-URI is provided, which allows remote attackers to conduct cache-poisoning attacks via an HTTP request.
CVE-2016-4553
Score elevated to 9.0 because EPSS predicts 80% probability of exploitation within the next 30 days (top 0.4% of all CVEs). NVD baseline CVSS 8.6 retained for reference. Confidence: see factors.
- High exploitation likelihood — EPSS 80%
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 8.6
- EG Score
- 9.0(high)
- EG Risk
- 77(Track)EG Risk 77/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity90% × 45%Exploitation80% × 40%Automatability30% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 80%
- EPSS %ILE
- 100%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
May 10, 2016
Last Modified
June 17, 2026
Advisory Details (5)
Auto-updated Sep 1, 2026[SECURITY] [DSA 3625-1] squid3 security update
http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3625Patch Availability(3)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fixed in / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| ubuntu | squidclient (3.5.12-1ubuntu7.2) @ xenial | 2026-05-22 | ubuntu |
| redhat | squid34-7:3.4.14-9.el6_8.3 | 2016-05-31 | redhat |
| redhat | squid-7:3.3.8-26.el7_2.3 | 2016-05-31 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Debian:8(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| squid3 | 3.4.8-6, 3.4.8-6+deb8u1, 3.4.8-6+deb8u2, 3.4.8-6+deb8u2~bpo70+1 | 3.4.8-6+deb8u3 | — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
All Vendor Advisories
(3)
Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 1× in last 7d / 11× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-09-10 09:26 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-04 13:56 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-02 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-31 04:20 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-30 19:12 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-26 14:41 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-21 23:44 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-19 16:59 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-16 02:09 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-15 01:25 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-14 12:16 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-12 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-11 13:36 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-04 10:32 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-30 00:37 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-07-28 15:31 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-26 14:50 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-25 14:13 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-23 01:23 UTCEG score recompute▲ 0.40
- 2026-07-22 22:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-21 15:21 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-21 15:21 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-20 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-16 16:59 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 45 moreShow fewer
- 2026-07-16 16:59 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-15 16:54 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-15 16:54 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-13 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-12 10:08 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-07-11 08:23 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-06 16:24 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-06 16:24 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-01 15:02 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-28 04:53 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-25 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-25 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-23 21:30 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-23 15:30 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-06-21 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-21 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-17 17:50 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-17 17:50 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-15 17:45 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-14 23:14 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-12 23:09 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-12 23:09 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-10 22:15 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-10 13:18 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-08 14:14 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-06 19:59 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-06-05 22:44 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-04 13:10 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-04 13:10 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-31 00:14 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-28 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-28 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-22 21:15 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-22 21:15 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-22 20:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-05-22 20:27 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-05-22 20:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-05-21 22:40 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-20 22:37 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-20 22:37 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-20 22:37 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-18 21:30 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-18 21:30 UTCEPSS rescore
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2016-4553?
When was CVE-2016-4553 disclosed?
Is CVE-2016-4553 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2016-4553?
How do I remediate CVE-2016-4553?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2016-4553
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2016-4553?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.