CVE-2016-20080

MEDIUMPre-NVD 6.26.2
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 6.2 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-06-15. A secondary CVSS source baseline 6.2; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — 3 sources updated this weekElevated
6.2EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan mitigationRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.4%CVSS: 6.2Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.

The CVE record's CNA (VulnCheck) lists Brandfolder versions up to and including 3.0 as affected. No release containing a fix is confirmed on record.

WordPress Brandfolder plugin version 3.0 and earlier contains a local file inclusion vulnerability in callback.php that allows unauthenticated attackers to include arbitrary files by manipulating the wp_abspath parameter. Attackers can supply path traversal sequences or remote URLs through the wp_abspath parameter to read sensitive files like wp-config.php or execute remote code.

CVSS v3
6.2
EG Score
6.2MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
44
EG Risk 44/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity62% × 45%
The EG Score, 6.2 of 10.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.
EPSS PROB
0.4%
EPSS %ILE
31st
KEV
Not listed

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

June 15, 2026

Last Modified

June 15, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Jun 15, 2026
No fix on record yet.
Web page

WordPress Brandfolder Plugin 3.0 Local File Inclusion via callback.php | Advisories | VulnCheck

https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/wordpress-brandfolder-plugin-local-file-inclusion-via-callback-php
Web page

Brandfolder – Digital Asset Management Simplified. – WordPress plugin | WordPress.org

https://wordpress.org/plugins/brandfolder/
Web page

Brandfolder - The Most Usable Digital Asset Management Platform

https://brandfolder.com

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2016-20080(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 28× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 99 of 200 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 1 repeat row among the latest 100 is merged into the row it repeats. The 101 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-12 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  2. 2026-10-12 16:13 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-12 16:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ghh8-7wjf-qjgj · GitHub CVSS 6.2
  4. 2026-10-12 01:08 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-11 13:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  6. 2026-10-10 19:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  7. 2026-10-09 20:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  8. 2026-10-08 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  9. 2026-10-07 23:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  10. 2026-10-06 15:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  11. 2026-10-05 17:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  12. 2026-10-04 23:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  13. 2026-10-03 14:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  14. 2026-10-01 19:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  15. 2026-09-30 14:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  16. 2026-09-30 09:12 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-09-28 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  18. 2026-09-27 13:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  19. 2026-09-26 15:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  20. 2026-09-24 13:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  21. 2026-09-23 13:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  22. 2026-09-19 15:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  23. 2026-09-18 19:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  24. 2026-09-17 19:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  25. 2026-09-15 03:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
Show 74 more
  1. 2026-09-14 03:47 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-09-14 03:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ghh8-7wjf-qjgj · GitHub CVSS 6.2
  3. 2026-09-13 16:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  4. 2026-09-12 14:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  5. 2026-09-10 09:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  6. 2026-09-07 15:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  7. 2026-09-04 13:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  8. 2026-09-02 14:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  9. 2026-09-01 03:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  10. 2026-08-30 23:00 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-08-30 23:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ghh8-7wjf-qjgj · GitHub CVSS 6.2
  12. 2026-08-30 19:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  13. 2026-08-27 14:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  14. 2026-08-26 14:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  15. 2026-08-25 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  16. 2026-08-24 23:39 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-08-24 23:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ghh8-7wjf-qjgj · GitHub CVSS 6.2
  18. 2026-08-23 09:49 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-08-23 09:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ghh8-7wjf-qjgj · GitHub CVSS 6.2
  20. 2026-08-23 00:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  21. 2026-08-21 23:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  22. 2026-08-21 17:46 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-08-21 17:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ghh8-7wjf-qjgj · GitHub CVSS 6.2
  24. 2026-08-20 16:22 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-08-20 16:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ghh8-7wjf-qjgj · GitHub CVSS 6.2
  26. 2026-08-19 16:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  27. 2026-08-19 13:16 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-08-19 13:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ghh8-7wjf-qjgj · GitHub CVSS 6.2
  29. 2026-08-18 13:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  30. 2026-08-17 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  31. 2026-08-17 07:58 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-08-17 07:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ghh8-7wjf-qjgj · GitHub CVSS 6.2
  33. 2026-08-16 14:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  34. 2026-08-16 06:54 UTCEG score recompute
  35. 2026-08-16 06:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ghh8-7wjf-qjgj · GitHub CVSS 6.2
  36. 2026-08-16 02:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  37. 2026-08-15 05:51 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-08-15 05:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ghh8-7wjf-qjgj · GitHub CVSS 6.2
  39. 2026-08-15 01:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  40. 2026-08-14 04:17 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-08-14 04:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ghh8-7wjf-qjgj · GitHub CVSS 6.2
  42. 2026-08-13 03:13 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-08-13 03:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ghh8-7wjf-qjgj · GitHub CVSS 6.2
  44. 2026-08-12 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  45. 2026-08-12 02:10 UTCEG score recompute
  46. 2026-08-12 02:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ghh8-7wjf-qjgj · GitHub CVSS 6.2
  47. 2026-08-11 13:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  48. 2026-08-11 01:06 UTCEG score recompute
  49. 2026-08-11 01:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ghh8-7wjf-qjgj · GitHub CVSS 6.2
  50. 2026-08-10 00:02 UTCEG score recompute
  51. 2026-08-10 00:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ghh8-7wjf-qjgj · GitHub CVSS 6.2
  52. 2026-08-09 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  53. 2026-08-08 22:59 UTCEG score recompute
  54. 2026-08-08 22:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ghh8-7wjf-qjgj · GitHub CVSS 6.2
  55. 2026-08-08 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  56. 2026-08-07 21:55 UTCEG score recompute
  57. 2026-08-07 21:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ghh8-7wjf-qjgj · GitHub CVSS 6.2
  58. 2026-08-06 20:51 UTCEG score recompute
  59. 2026-08-06 20:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ghh8-7wjf-qjgj · GitHub CVSS 6.2
  60. 2026-08-06 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  61. 2026-08-05 19:47 UTCEG score recompute
  62. 2026-08-05 19:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ghh8-7wjf-qjgj · GitHub CVSS 6.2
  63. 2026-08-05 19:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  64. 2026-08-04 15:48 UTCEG score recompute
  65. 2026-08-04 15:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ghh8-7wjf-qjgj · GitHub CVSS 6.2
  66. 2026-08-04 15:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  67. 2026-08-04 10:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  68. 2026-08-03 14:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ghh8-7wjf-qjgj · GitHub CVSS 6.2
  69. 2026-08-02 09:59 UTCEG score recompute
  70. 2026-08-02 09:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ghh8-7wjf-qjgj · GitHub CVSS 6.2
  71. 2026-08-02 02:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  72. 2026-08-01 08:55 UTCEG score recompute
  73. 2026-08-01 08:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ghh8-7wjf-qjgj · GitHub CVSS 6.2
  74. 2026-08-01 04:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile

Related CVEs(same CWE)

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2016-20080?
CVE-2016-20080 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on June 15, 2026. WordPress Brandfolder plugin version 3.0 and earlier contains a local file inclusion vulnerability in callback.php that allows unauthenticated attackers to include arbitrary files by manipulating the wpabspath parameter. Attackers can supply path traversal sequences or remote URLs through the…
When was CVE-2016-20080 made public?
CVE-2016-20080 was made public on March 22, 2016: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, VulnCheck, gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on June 15, 2026. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of June 15, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2016-20080 actively exploited?
CVE-2016-20080 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.4% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (31st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2016-20080?
CVE-2016-20080 has a CVSS base score of 6.2 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2016-20080?
No fix for CVE-2016-20080 is confirmed yet. Until one is published, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation — for example, keep it off the internet or limit it to trusted networks — and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix. The CVE record's CNA (VulnCheck) lists Brandfolder versions up to and including 3.0 as affected. No release containing a fix is confirmed on record. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2016-20080 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2016-20080

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2016-20080?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.

Book a Demo →Browse All CVEs