CVE-2016-20067

MEDIUMPre-NVD 4.34.3
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 4.3 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-06-15. The CNA's CVSS baseline 4.3; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: the CNA's CVSS, EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory
4.3EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.1%CVSS: 4.3Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.

WordPress CP Polls 1.0.8 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform unauthorized actions on behalf of authenticated users. Attackers can craft malicious HTML pages that execute unwanted poll operations when administrators visit the page while logged in.

CVSS v3
4.3
EG Score
4.3MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
19
EG Risk 19/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity43% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 4.3 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.1% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.
EPSS PROB
0.1%
EPSS %ILE
1st
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (4.3): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 4.3 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
4.3 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.1% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-17). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.

No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

June 15, 2026

Last Modified

June 15, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Jun 15, 2026
No fix on record yet.
Web page

WordPress CP Polls 1.0.8 Cross-Site Request Forgery | Advisories | VulnCheck

https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/wordpress-cp-polls-cross-site-request-forgery
Web page

WordPress Plugin CP Polls 1.0.8 - Multiple Vulnerabilities - PHP webapps Exploit

https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/39513

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2016-20067(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 6× in last 7d / 26× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 199 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 99 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-23 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  2. 2026-10-22 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  3. 2026-10-21 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  4. 2026-10-20 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  5. 2026-10-19 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  6. 2026-10-18 10:52 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-15 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  8. 2026-10-14 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  9. 2026-10-13 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  10. 2026-10-12 20:45 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-12 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  12. 2026-10-12 01:08 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-11 13:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  14. 2026-10-10 19:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  15. 2026-10-09 20:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  16. 2026-10-08 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  17. 2026-10-07 23:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  18. 2026-10-06 15:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  19. 2026-10-05 17:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  20. 2026-10-04 23:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  21. 2026-10-01 19:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  22. 2026-09-30 14:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  23. 2026-09-30 09:12 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-09-28 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  25. 2026-09-27 13:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-09-24 13:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  2. 2026-09-23 13:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  3. 2026-09-19 15:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  4. 2026-09-18 19:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  5. 2026-09-17 19:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  6. 2026-09-15 03:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  7. 2026-09-14 03:48 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-09-14 03:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6fm-r287-xjqj · GitHub CVSS 4.3
  9. 2026-09-13 16:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  10. 2026-09-12 14:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  11. 2026-09-10 09:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  12. 2026-09-04 13:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  13. 2026-09-01 03:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  14. 2026-08-30 23:01 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-08-30 23:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6fm-r287-xjqj · GitHub CVSS 4.3
  16. 2026-08-30 19:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  17. 2026-08-27 14:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  18. 2026-08-26 14:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  19. 2026-08-25 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  20. 2026-08-24 23:39 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-08-24 23:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6fm-r287-xjqj · GitHub CVSS 4.3
  22. 2026-08-23 09:49 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-08-23 09:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6fm-r287-xjqj · GitHub CVSS 4.3
  24. 2026-08-21 23:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  25. 2026-08-21 09:54 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-08-21 09:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6fm-r287-xjqj · GitHub CVSS 4.3
  27. 2026-08-20 11:12 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-08-20 11:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6fm-r287-xjqj · GitHub CVSS 4.3
  29. 2026-08-19 16:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  30. 2026-08-19 13:16 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-08-19 13:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6fm-r287-xjqj · GitHub CVSS 4.3
  32. 2026-08-17 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  33. 2026-08-16 23:40 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-08-16 23:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6fm-r287-xjqj · GitHub CVSS 4.3
  35. 2026-08-16 14:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  36. 2026-08-16 02:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  37. 2026-08-16 01:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6fm-r287-xjqj · GitHub CVSS 4.3
  38. 2026-08-15 03:46 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-08-15 03:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6fm-r287-xjqj · GitHub CVSS 4.3
  40. 2026-08-15 01:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  41. 2026-08-14 05:49 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-08-14 05:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6fm-r287-xjqj · GitHub CVSS 4.3
  43. 2026-08-13 07:53 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-08-13 07:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6fm-r287-xjqj · GitHub CVSS 4.3
  45. 2026-08-12 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  46. 2026-08-12 09:26 UTCEG score recompute
  47. 2026-08-12 09:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6fm-r287-xjqj · GitHub CVSS 4.3
  48. 2026-08-11 13:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  49. 2026-08-11 11:29 UTCEG score recompute
  50. 2026-08-11 11:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6fm-r287-xjqj · GitHub CVSS 4.3
  51. 2026-08-10 13:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6fm-r287-xjqj · GitHub CVSS 4.3
  52. 2026-08-09 15:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6fm-r287-xjqj · GitHub CVSS 4.3
  53. 2026-08-08 17:40 UTCEG score recompute
  54. 2026-08-08 17:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6fm-r287-xjqj · GitHub CVSS 4.3
  55. 2026-08-08 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  56. 2026-08-07 19:44 UTCEG score recompute
  57. 2026-08-07 19:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6fm-r287-xjqj · GitHub CVSS 4.3
  58. 2026-08-06 21:48 UTCEG score recompute
  59. 2026-08-06 21:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6fm-r287-xjqj · GitHub CVSS 4.3
  60. 2026-08-06 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  61. 2026-08-05 23:51 UTCEG score recompute
  62. 2026-08-05 23:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6fm-r287-xjqj · GitHub CVSS 4.3
  63. 2026-08-05 19:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  64. 2026-08-05 01:55 UTCEG score recompute
  65. 2026-08-05 01:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6fm-r287-xjqj · GitHub CVSS 4.3
  66. 2026-08-04 15:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  67. 2026-08-04 10:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  68. 2026-08-04 02:53 UTCEG score recompute
  69. 2026-08-04 02:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6fm-r287-xjqj · GitHub CVSS 4.3
  70. 2026-08-03 04:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6fm-r287-xjqj · GitHub CVSS 4.3
  71. 2026-08-02 06:53 UTCEG score recompute
  72. 2026-08-02 06:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6fm-r287-xjqj · GitHub CVSS 4.3
  73. 2026-08-02 02:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  74. 2026-08-01 08:56 UTCEG score recompute
  75. 2026-08-01 08:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6fm-r287-xjqj · GitHub CVSS 4.3

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2016-20067?
CVE-2016-20067 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on June 15, 2026. WordPress CP Polls 1.0.8 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform unauthorized actions on behalf of authenticated users. Attackers can craft malicious HTML pages that execute unwanted poll operations when administrators visit the page while logged in.
When was CVE-2016-20067 made public?
CVE-2016-20067 was made public on February 22, 2016: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, VulnCheck, gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on June 15, 2026. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of June 15, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2016-20067 actively exploited?
CVE-2016-20067 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (1st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2016-20067?
CVE-2016-20067 has a CVSS base score of 4.3 (the CNA's own assessment, by vulncheck; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2016-20067?
No fix for CVE-2016-20067 is confirmed yet. Until one is published, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation — for example, keep it off the internet or limit it to trusted networks — and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2016-20067 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2016-20067

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2016-20067?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.