MVPower CCTV DVR models, including TV-7104HE 1.8.4 115215B9 and TV7108HE, contain a web shell that is accessible via a /shell URI. A remote unauthenticated attacker can execute arbitrary operating system commands as root. This vulnerability has also been referred to as the "JAWS webserver RCE" because of the easily identifying HTTP response server field. Other firmware versions, at least from 2014 through 2019, can be affected. This was exploited in the wild in 2017 through 2022.
CVE-2016-20016
“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.
Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2022-10-19. NVD baseline CVSS 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.
- High exploitation likelihood — EPSS 86%
- Public exploit code is available (Metasploit)
No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.
- CVSS v3
- 9.8
- EG Score
- 9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 94EG Risk 94/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity98% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation86% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and watch for a fix. - EPSS PROB
- 86%
- EPSS %ILE
- 99th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 86% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-20). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track* at medium mission impactTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and watch for a fix.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
October 19, 2022
Last Modified
May 9, 2025
Advisory Details (3)
Auto-updated Oct 9, 2026Pwning CCTV cameras | Pen Test Partners
https://www.pentestpartners.com/security-blog/pwning-cctv-cameras/MVPower DVR TV-7104HE 1.8.4 115215B9 - Shell Command Execution (Metasploit) - ARM remote Exploit
https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/41471IoT_reaper: A Rappid Spreading New IoT Botnet
https://blog.netlab.360.com/iot_reaper-a-rappid-spreading-new-iot-botnet-en/Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 17× in last 7d / 28× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 8 repeat rows among the latest 80 are merged into the row they repeat.
- 2026-10-21 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 86% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-21 02:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-21 02:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p4xh-2j8v-rpq8 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-20 03:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-20 03:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p4xh-2j8v-rpq8 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-19 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 86% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-19 03:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-19 03:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p4xh-2j8v-rpq8 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-18 04:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-18 04:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p4xh-2j8v-rpq8 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-17 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 86% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-17 05:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 05:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p4xh-2j8v-rpq8 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-16 06:13 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-16 06:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p4xh-2j8v-rpq8 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-15 04:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-15 04:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p4xh-2j8v-rpq8 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-14 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 86% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-14 00:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-14 00:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p4xh-2j8v-rpq8 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-12 20:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p4xh-2j8v-rpq8 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-12 20:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 01:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-09 20:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 86% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 86% · 99th percentile
Show 47 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-30 14:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 86% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-30 09:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-24 13:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 86% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-18 19:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 86% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-12 14:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 86% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-10 09:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 86% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-07 15:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 86% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-04 13:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 86% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-30 19:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 86% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-27 14:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 86% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-26 14:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 86% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-19 16:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 87% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-17 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 87% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-16 02:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 87% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-11 13:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 87% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-08 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 87% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-30 16:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 87% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-28 15:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 87% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-23 01:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 22:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 86% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-20 17:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 86% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-19 02:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 86% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-15 16:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 86% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-13 22:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 86% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-12 05:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 86% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-07 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 86% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-01 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 86% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 86% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-23 21:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 86% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-18 17:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 86% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-17 17:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 86% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-15 17:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 86% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-14 23:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 91% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-13 22:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 91% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-12 23:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 91% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-10 22:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 91% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-10 13:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 91% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-08 14:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 91% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 91% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-05 22:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 91% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-02 20:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 91% · 99th percentile
- 2026-05-31 00:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 91% · 99th percentile
- 2026-05-29 13:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 91% · 99th percentile
- 2026-05-28 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 91% · 99th percentile
- 2026-05-25 13:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-05-25 13:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p4xh-2j8v-rpq8 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
Publicly available exploits
(1 reference)Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 Metasploit module). No fix is confirmed yet, so defenders should restrict or isolate affected systems accordingly until one is published.
- Metasploitexploit/linux/http/mvpower_dvr_shell_exec✓ verifiedPublished Feb 23, 2017
MVPower DVR Shell Unauthenticated Command Execution
Open source ↗
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-78
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2016-20016?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2016-20016 published?
Is CVE-2016-20016 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2016-20016?
How do I remediate CVE-2016-20016?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2016-20016
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2016-20016?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.