CVE-2016-10030

HIGHNVD 8.18.1—
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 8.1 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2022-05-17. NVD baseline CVSS 8.1; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
8.1
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: 2%CVSS: 8.1Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

The _prolog_error function in slurmd/req.c in Slurm before 15.08.13, 16.x before 16.05.7, and 17.x before 17.02.0-pre4 has a vulnerability in how the slurmd daemon informs users of a Prolog failure on a compute node. That vulnerability could allow a user to assume control of an arbitrary file on the system. Any exploitation of this is dependent on the user being able to cause or anticipate the failure (non-zero return code) of a Prolog script that their job would run on. This issue affects all Slurm versions from 0.6.0 (September 2005) to present. Workarounds to prevent exploitation of this are to either disable your Prolog script, or modify it such that it always returns 0 ("success") and adjust it to set the node as down using scontrol instead of relying on the slurmd to handle that automatically. If you do not have a Prolog set you are unaffected by this issue.

CVSS v3
8.1
EG Score
8.1(medium)
EG Risk
42(Track)
EG Risk 42/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity81% × 45%
Exploitation2% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS
82.9%
KEV
Not listed

Published

January 5, 2017

Last Modified

May 6, 2026

References (6)

Patch Availability(2)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntuslurm-client-emulator (15.08.7-1ubuntu0.1~esm4) @ xenial2026-05-22ubuntu
ubuntuslurm-wlm-basic-plugins (15.08.7-1ubuntu0.1~esm5) @ xenial2026-05-22ubuntu

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

All Vendor Advisories

(2)

Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 14× in last 7d / 42× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 102 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-07-24 14:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-23 14:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-23 01:21 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-07-23 00:22 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-07-22 22:00 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-07-22 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-21 15:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-21 15:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-20 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-19 14:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-19 14:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-19 02:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-19 02:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-18 10:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-16 16:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-15 16:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-15 16:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-15 01:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-13 22:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-13 22:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-12 05:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-12 05:11 UTCOSV refresh
  23. 2026-07-11 08:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-09 19:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-09 19:05 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-07-08 15:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-07 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-07 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-06 16:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-06 02:20 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-05 02:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-04 06:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-01 15:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-06-30 23:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-06-30 23:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-06-29 14:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-06-29 14:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-06-28 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-06-28 04:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-27 03:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-25 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-25 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-23 21:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-23 11:28 UTCOSV refresh
  22. 2026-06-22 14:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-22 14:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-21 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-21 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-21 01:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-21 01:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-19 19:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-19 19:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-18 17:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-17 17:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-17 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-16 17:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-16 17:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-15 17:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-14 23:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-13 22:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-12 23:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-12 23:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-11 13:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-11 13:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-10 22:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-10 13:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-08 14:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-07 15:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-06 13:10 UTCOSV refresh
  48. 2026-06-05 22:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-05 06:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-05 06:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-04 13:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-04 13:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-02 20:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-01 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-01 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-05-31 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-05-31 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-05-31 00:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-05-29 13:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-05-28 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-05-28 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-05-27 13:38 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-05-27 13:38 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-05-26 13:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-05-26 07:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-05-26 07:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-05-24 16:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-05-22 21:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-05-22 17:23 UTCEG score recompute
  70. 2026-05-22 17:23 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-05-22 17:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  72. 2026-05-21 22:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-05-20 11:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-05-20 11:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-05-20 11:21 UTCEPSS rescore

Related CVEs(same vendor)

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2016-10030?
CVE-2016-10030 is a high vulnerability published on January 5, 2017. The prologerror function in slurmd/req.c in Slurm before 15.08.13, 16.x before 16.05.7, and 17.x before 17.02.0-pre4 has a vulnerability in how the slurmd daemon informs users of a Prolog failure on a compute node. That vulnerability could allow a user to assume control of an arbitrary file on the…
When was CVE-2016-10030 disclosed?
CVE-2016-10030 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on January 5, 2017, with the most recent update on May 6, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2016-10030 actively exploited?
CVE-2016-10030 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 82.9% percentile likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days — higher percentiles indicate greater predicted risk.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2016-10030?
CVE-2016-10030 has a CVSS v3 base score of 8.1 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2016-10030?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2016-10030, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2016-10030

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2016-10030?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.

Start Free Scan →Browse All CVEs