CVE-2015-6922

CRITICALNVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

This critical-severity CVE scores 9.8 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 82% (99th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from NVD CVSS v3
Sources: EPSS, NVD CVSS v3
Weaponized
9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan mitigationRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High exploitation likelihood — EPSS 82%
  • Public exploit code is available (Metasploit, Exploit-DB, marked verified by Exploit-DB)
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 82%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: Metasploit · Exploit-DB (verified)Exposed services: Not assessed

No fix has been recorded since the CVE record was published in 2020 — use a compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and check the vendor's advisory.

Kaseya Virtual System Administrator (VSA) 7.x before 7.0.0.33, 8.x before 8.0.0.23, 9.0 before 9.0.0.19, and 9.1 before 9.1.0.9 does not properly require authentication, which allows remote attackers to bypass authentication and (1) add an administrative account via crafted request to LocalAuth/setAccount.aspx or (2) write to and execute arbitrary files via a full pathname in the PathData parameter to ConfigTab/uploader.aspx.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
77
EG Risk 77/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
The EG Score, 9.8 of 10.
Exploitation82% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
Exploitation public PoC (exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: No fix has been recorded since the CVE record was published in 2020. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and check the vendor's advisory for a fix.
EPSS PROB
82%
EPSS %ILE
99th
KEV
Not listed

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.

No fix has been recorded since the CVE record was published in 2020. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and check the vendor's advisory for a fix.

Exploitation public PoC (exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

February 17, 2020

Last Modified

November 21, 2024

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Oct 7, 2026
No fix on record since 2020.
Web page

Kaseya Virtual System Administrator (VSA) - Multiple Vulnerabilities (2) - ASP webapps Exploit

https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/38351/
Web page

ZDI-15-449 - TrendAI™ Zero Day Initiative™ (ZDI)

http://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-15-449
Web page

ZDI-15-448 - TrendAI™ Zero Day Initiative™ (ZDI)

http://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-15-448

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 4× in last 7d / 8× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 15 repeat rows among the latest 73 are merged into the row they repeat.

  1. 2026-10-12 01:13 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-10 19:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 82% · 99th percentile
  3. 2026-10-07 23:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 82% · 99th percentile
  4. 2026-10-05 17:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 82% · 99th percentile
  5. 2026-09-30 14:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 82% · 99th percentile
  6. 2026-09-30 09:06 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-09-18 19:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 82% · 99th percentile
  8. 2026-09-15 03:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 82% · 99th percentile
  9. 2026-09-10 09:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 82% · 99th percentile
  10. 2026-09-07 15:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 82% · 99th percentile
  11. 2026-09-06 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 82% · 99th percentile
  12. 2026-09-01 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 82% · 99th percentile
  13. 2026-08-26 14:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 82% · 99th percentile
  14. 2026-08-21 23:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 82% · 99th percentile
  15. 2026-08-20 22:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 82% · 99th percentile
  16. 2026-08-19 16:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 82% · 99th percentile
  17. 2026-08-16 02:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 82% · 99th percentile
  18. 2026-08-12 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 82% · 99th percentile
  19. 2026-08-05 19:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 82% · 99th percentile
  20. 2026-07-26 14:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 82% · 99th percentile
  21. 2026-07-25 14:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 82% · 99th percentile
  22. 2026-07-24 14:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 82% · 99th percentile
  23. 2026-07-23 01:19 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-07-23 00:21 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-07-22 21:59 UTCEG score recompute
Show 33 more
  1. 2026-07-22 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 82% · 99th percentile
  2. 2026-07-20 17:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 82% · 99th percentile
  3. 2026-07-19 02:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 82% · 99th percentile
  4. 2026-07-15 16:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 82% · 99th percentile
  5. 2026-07-15 01:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 82% · 99th percentile
  6. 2026-07-11 08:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 82% · 99th percentile
  7. 2026-07-08 15:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 82% · 99th percentile
  8. 2026-07-04 06:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 82% · 99th percentile
  9. 2026-07-01 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 82% · 99th percentile
  10. 2026-06-30 23:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 82% · 99th percentile
  11. 2026-06-29 14:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 82% · 99th percentile
  12. 2026-06-25 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 82% · 99th percentile
  13. 2026-06-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 82% · 99th percentile
  14. 2026-06-23 21:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 82% · 99th percentile
  15. 2026-06-21 14:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 82% · 99th percentile
  16. 2026-06-21 01:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 82% · 99th percentile
  17. 2026-06-17 17:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 82% · 99th percentile
  18. 2026-06-15 17:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 82% · 99th percentile
  19. 2026-06-13 22:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 78% · 99th percentile
  20. 2026-06-12 23:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 78% · 99th percentile
  21. 2026-06-11 13:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 78% · 99th percentile
  22. 2026-06-10 22:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 78% · 99th percentile
  23. 2026-06-08 14:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 78% · 99th percentile
  24. 2026-06-07 15:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 78% · 99th percentile
  25. 2026-06-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 78% · 99th percentile
  26. 2026-06-05 22:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 78% · 99th percentile
  27. 2026-06-05 06:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 78% · 99th percentile
  28. 2026-06-01 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 78% · 99th percentile
  29. 2026-05-31 00:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 78% · 99th percentile
  30. 2026-05-29 13:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 78% · 99th percentile
  31. 2026-05-28 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 78% · 99th percentile
  32. 2026-05-27 07:36 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-05-27 07:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qf3c-cpvg-3663 · GitHub severity HIGH

Publicly available exploits

(4 references)

Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (2 Metasploit modules, 2 Exploit-DB entries). No fix has been recorded since the CVE record was published in 2020. If the vendor still supports the product, apply the fixed version it names; if it no longer does, isolate the affected system.

  • Exploit-DBEDB-38401✓ verified
    Published Oct 5, 2015

    Kaseya Virtual System Administrator (VSA) - 'uploader.aspx' Arbitrary File Upload (Metasploit)

    Open source ↗
  • Metasploitauxiliary/admin/http/kaseya_master_admin✓ verified
    Published Oct 2, 2015

    Kaseya VSA Master Administrator Account Creation

    Open source ↗
  • Metasploitexploit/windows/http/kaseya_uploader✓ verified
    Published Oct 2, 2015

    Kaseya VSA uploader.aspx Arbitrary File Upload

    Open source ↗
  • Exploit-DBEDB-38351✓ verified
    Published Sep 29, 2015

    Kaseya Virtual System Administrator (VSA) - Multiple Vulnerabilities (2)

    Open source ↗

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2015-6922?
CVE-2015-6922 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on February 17, 2020. Kaseya Virtual System Administrator (VSA) 7.x before 7.0.0.33, 8.x before 8.0.0.23, 9.0 before 9.0.0.19, and 9.1 before 9.1.0.9 does not properly require authentication, which allows remote attackers to bypass authentication and (1) add an administrative account via crafted request to…
When was CVE-2015-6922 made public?
CVE-2015-6922 was made public on September 11, 2015: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, MITRE Corporation, gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on February 17, 2020. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 21, 2024; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2015-6922 actively exploited?
CVE-2015-6922 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. EchelonGraph's EG-KEV model places it in Tier 2 (Weaponized), which is not evidence of exploitation: a Metasploit module exists for it, and Exploit-DB marks a public exploit for it as verified. EchelonGraph does not test whether exploit code works. FIRST EPSS estimates a 82% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (99th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2015-6922?
CVE-2015-6922 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2015-6922?
No fix for CVE-2015-6922 has been recorded since its CVE record was published in 2020. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation — for example, keep it off the internet or limit it to trusted networks — and check the vendor's advisory for a fix.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2015-6922

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2015-6922?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.