The shadow_copy2_get_shadow_copy_data function in modules/vfs_shadow_copy2.c in Samba 3.x and 4.x before 4.1.22, 4.2.x before 4.2.7, and 4.3.x before 4.3.3 does not verify that the DIRECTORY_LIST access right has been granted, which allows remote attackers to access snapshots by visiting a shadow copy directory.
CVE-2015-5299
Score 5.3 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2022-05-17. NVD baseline CVSS 5.3; sources differ by 0.0.
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
A fix is available — apply it.
Internet exposure
The internet-exposure footprint is temporarily unavailable — the KEV-Exposure radar's record for this CVE could not be loaded just now. That is not a finding of zero exposed services; please retry shortly.
- CVSS v3
- 5.3
- EG Score
- 5.3MEDIUMmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 44EG Risk 44/100CISA SSVC
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity53% × 45%Exploitation40% × 40%Automatability30% × 15%CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 14%
- EPSS %ILE
- 96th
- KEV
- Not listed
CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation public PoC (EG-KEV: elevated) · Automatable unknown (not published for this CVE) · Technical impact partial (CVSS below 9.0). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table
Published
December 29, 2015
Last Modified
May 6, 2026
References (46)
- secalert@redhathttp://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-December/174076.html
- secalert@redhathttp://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-December/174391.html
- secalert@redhathttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-12/msg00019.html
- secalert@redhathttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-12/msg00020.html
- secalert@redhathttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-12/msg00032.html
- secalert@redhathttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-12/msg00033.html
- secalert@redhathttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-01/msg00002.html
- secalert@redhathttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-01/msg00017.html
- secalert@redhathttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-04/msg00042.html
- secalert@redhathttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-04/msg00047.html
- secalert@redhathttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-04/msg00048.html
- secalert@redhathttp://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3433
- secalert@redhathttp://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/bulletinjan2016-2867206.html
- secalert@redhathttp://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinjan2016-2867209.html
- secalert@redhathttp://www.securityfocus.com/bid/79729
Vendor Advisories for CVE-2015-5299
Vendor advisories for this CVE are temporarily unavailable — the list could not be loaded just now. That is not a sign that none exist; please retry shortly.
All Vendor Advisories
(6)
Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.
- Red HatRHSA-2016:0006MODERATE2015-12-16
RHSA-2016:0006 — Moderate
- Red HatRHSA-2016:0010MODERATE2015-12-16
RHSA-2016:0010 — Moderate
- Red HatRHSA-2016:0011MODERATE2015-12-16
RHSA-2016:0011 — Moderate
- Red HatRHSA-2016:0015MODERATE2015-12-16
RHSA-2016:0015 — Moderate
- Red HatRHSA-2016:0016MODERATE2015-12-16
RHSA-2016:0016 — Moderate
- UbuntuUSN-2855-1MEDIUM
Samba vulnerabilities
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor)
Same product
10 shownDebian:6.0:samba · Debian:7:samba
- CVE-2015-5252EG 7.2EPSS p96HIGH
- CVE-2015-5296EG 5.4EPSS p94MEDIUM
- CVE-2015-0240EG 10.0EPSS p100HIGH
- CVE-2013-4408EG 8.3HIGH
- CVE-2013-4475EG 4.0EPSS p95MEDIUM
- CVE-2017-7494EG 9.8 KEVEPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2016-2118NVD 7.5EG 7.7EPSS p98HIGH
- CVE-2017-2619EG 7.5EPSS p96HIGH
- CVE-2017-15275EG 7.5EPSS p98HIGH
- CVE-2015-8467EG 7.5HIGH
Same vendor
6 shownredhat:RHSA-2016:0006 · redhat:RHSA-2016:0010 · ubuntu:USN-2855-1
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2015-5299?
When was CVE-2015-5299 disclosed?
Is CVE-2015-5299 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2015-5299?
How do I remediate CVE-2015-5299?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2015-5299
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2015-5299?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.