crypto/rsa/rsa_ameth.c in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1q and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2e allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and application crash) via an RSA PSS ASN.1 signature that lacks a mask generation function parameter.
CVE-2015-3194
HIGHNVD 7.57.9Trending — 3 sources updated this weekElevatedEG-KEV Tier 3: ElevatedEG-KEV is EchelonGraph's own tiering of exploitation signals from CISA KEV, CISA's SSVC data (Vulnrichment), ransomware data, public exploit-code references and EPSS.Tier 3 is not evidence of exploitation. It means public exploit code is referenced, or CISA's SSVC data says "public PoC", or EPSS ranks the CVE in the top 5%.Signals for this CVE: EPSS in the top 5%.EchelonGraph confidence 38%: a heuristic from the tier and the number of signals, not a measured probability.
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence
“▲” beside the score: it is higher than NVD's CVSS score.
Score elevated to 7.9 because EPSS predicted 44% probability of exploitation within the next 30 days (98th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs) when EchelonGraph scored this CVE. NVD baseline CVSS 7.5 retained for reference. Confidence: see factors.
Triggered by: EPSS exploit prediction (continuous uplift above 30%)
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
7.9EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 44%CVSS: 7.5Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 7.5
- EG Score
- 7.9HIGHhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 53EG Risk 53/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity79% × 45%The EG Score, 7.9 of 10.Exploitation44% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 44%
- EPSS %ILE
- 98th
- KEV
- Not listed
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
December 6, 2015
Last Modified
May 6, 2026
References (38)
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://fortiguard.com/advisory/openssl-advisory-december-2015Third Party Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10759Third Party Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10761Third Party Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-December/173801.htmlMailing List · Third Party Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00009.htmlMailing List · Third Party Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00053.htmlMailing List · Third Party Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2015-12/msg00070.htmlMailing List · Third Party Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2015-12/msg00071.htmlMailing List · Third Party Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2015-12/msg00087.htmlMailing List · Third Party Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=145382583417444&w=2Mailing List · Third Party Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://openssl.org/news/secadv/20151203.txtVendor Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-2617.htmlThird Party Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2957.htmlThird Party Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20151204-opensslThird Party Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3413Third Party Advisory
15 of 38 shown · show the other 23
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://www.fortiguard.com/advisory/openssl-advisory-december-2015Third Party Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuapr2016v3-2985753.htmlPatch · Vendor Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2016-2881720.htmlPatch · Vendor Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2017-3236626.htmlPatch · Vendor Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/bulletinjan2016-2867206.htmlVendor Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinoct2015-2719645.htmlVendor Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://www.securityfocus.com/bid/78623 (archived copy: the site no longer serves it)Third Party Advisory · VDB Entry
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://www.securityfocus.com/bid/91787 (archived copy: the site no longer serves it)Third Party Advisory · VDB Entry
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://www.securitytracker.com/id/1034294Third Party Advisory · VDB Entry
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://www.slackware.com/security/viewer.php?l=slackware-security&y=2015&m=slackware-security.754583Third Party Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2830-1Third Party Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288320Issue Tracking · Third Party Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttps://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-412672.pdf
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttps://git.openssl.org/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=c394a488942387246653833359a5c94b5832674e
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttps://git.openssl.org/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=d8541d7e9e63bf5f343af24644046c8d96498c17
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttps://h20566.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c04944173Third Party Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttps://h20566.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c05111017Third Party Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttps://h20566.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c05131085Third Party Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttps://h20566.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c05150888Third Party Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttps://h20566.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c05157667Third Party Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttps://h20566.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c05158380Third Party Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttps://h20566.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c05398322Third Party Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttps://kb.pulsesecure.net/articles/Pulse_Security_Advisories/SA40100Third Party Advisory
Patch Availability(3)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| ubuntu | libssl1.0.0 (1.0.2d-0ubuntu1.2) @ wily | 2026-05-22 | ubuntu |
| redhat | patch | 2016-12-15 | redhat |
| redhat | openssl-1:1.0.1e-51.el7_2.1 | 2015-12-14 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(6 across 6 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssl | — |
| — |
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssl | — |
| — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssl | — |
| — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssl | — |
| — |
Debian:7(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssl | 1.0.1e-2 ... 1.0.1e-2+deb7u9 (18 versions) |
| — |
Debian:8(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssl | 1.0.1k-3, 1.0.1k-3+alpha, 1.0.1k-3+deb8u1 |
| — |
All Vendor Advisories
(3)
Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 20× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 87 of 126 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 13 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 39 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-12 01:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-10 19:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-08 23:25 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-10-08 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-09-30 14:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-09-30 09:03 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-09-20 20:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-09-19 15:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-09-19 06:00 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-18 19:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-09-17 19:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-09-15 03:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-09-12 14:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-09-11 09:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-09-10 09:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-09-05 15:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
Show 62 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-04 13:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-09-02 14:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-08-31 09:16 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-30 19:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-08-27 14:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-08-26 14:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-08-25 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-08-21 23:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-08-20 22:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-08-19 16:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-08-16 14:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-08-16 02:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-08-15 01:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-08-14 15:24 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-12 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-08-07 16:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-08-06 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-08-04 15:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-08-01 04:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-30 16:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-30 03:54 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-07-30 01:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-28 15:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-26 14:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-24 14:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-23 14:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-23 01:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-23 00:19 UTCEG score recompute▲ 0.40
- 2026-07-22 21:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-21 15:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-20 17:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-19 14:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-19 02:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-18 10:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-16 16:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-15 16:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-15 01:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-13 22:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-12 13:08 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-07-12 05:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-11 08:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-09 19:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-08 15:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-05 02:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-04 06:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-02 15:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-01 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-06-30 23:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-06-28 04:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-06-27 03:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-06-25 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-06-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-06-23 21:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-06-23 18:50 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-06-22 14:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-06-21 14:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-06-21 01:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-06-18 17:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-06-17 17:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-06-16 17:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
- 2026-06-15 17:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor)
Same product
10 shownDebian:8:openssl
- CVE-2016-6303EG 9.8EPSS p98CRITICAL
- CVE-2016-2182EG 9.8EPSS p99CRITICAL
- CVE-2016-2177EG 9.8EPSS p99CRITICAL
- CVE-2016-2108EG 9.8EPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2016-2842EG 9.8EPSS p99CRITICAL
- CVE-2016-0799EG 9.8EPSS p98CRITICAL
- CVE-2016-0705EG 9.8EPSS p98CRITICAL
- CVE-2016-2107NVD 5.9EG 9.0EPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2015-4000NVD 3.7EG 9.0EPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2015-1789NVD 7.5EG 8.7EPSS p100HIGH
Same vendor
10 shownredhat:RHSA-2015:2617 · redhat:RHSA-2016:2957
- CVE-2015-3195NVD 5.3EG 5.9EPSS p99MEDIUM
- CVE-2015-3196EG 4.3EPSS p96MEDIUM
- CVE-2016-6808EG 9.8EPSS p98CRITICAL
- CVE-2016-2177EG 9.8EPSS p99CRITICAL
- CVE-2016-4448EG 9.8EPSS p94CRITICAL
- CVE-2016-2108EG 9.8EPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2016-2842EG 9.8EPSS p99CRITICAL
- CVE-2016-0799EG 9.8EPSS p98CRITICAL
- CVE-2016-0705EG 9.8EPSS p98CRITICAL
- CVE-2016-2107NVD 5.9EG 9.0EPSS p100CRITICAL
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2015-3194?
CVE-2015-3194 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on December 6, 2015. crypto/rsa/rsa_ameth.c in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1q and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2e allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and application crash) via an RSA PSS ASN.1 signature that lacks a mask generation function parameter.
When was CVE-2015-3194 made public?
CVE-2015-3194 was made public on December 4, 2015: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, Red Hat, Inc., gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on December 6, 2015. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of May 6, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2015-3194 actively exploited?
CVE-2015-3194 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 44% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (98th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2015-3194?
CVE-2015-3194 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.5 (NVD). EchelonGraph synthesises NVD + CISA KEV + FIRST EPSS + GHSA into a combined EG score of 7.9 (HIGH).
How do I remediate CVE-2015-3194?
A fix for CVE-2015-3194 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory.
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2015-3194
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2015-3194?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.