The ssl3_get_key_exchange function in s3_clnt.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8zd, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0p, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1k allows remote SSL servers to conduct RSA-to-EXPORT_RSA downgrade attacks and facilitate brute-force decryption by offering a weak ephemeral RSA key in a noncompliant role, related to the "FREAK" issue. NOTE: the scope of this CVE is only client code based on OpenSSL, not EXPORT_RSA issues associated with servers or other TLS implementations.
CVE-2015-0204
“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS v2 base score.
This CVE was only ever scored under CVSS v2.0. NVD CVSS v2.0 base 4.3 — NVD rates that MEDIUM (NVD's v2 bands: LOW 0.0–3.9 / MEDIUM 4.0–6.9 / HIGH 7.0–10.0; no CRITICAL band). Vector AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N. CVSS v2 is an older, coarser metric than v3.1/v4.0 (no Scope, no User Interaction, no Attack Requirements), so it is not directly comparable to a v3 or v4 score. NVD has never re-scored this record under v3. EPSS predicts 99% exploitation probability in the next 30 days; it does not lift the v2 base. EPSS sets EG Risk's exploitation input. Confidence: LOW.
Also known asEUVD-2015-0241 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-ff55-77ff-xv8x (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- High exploitation likelihood — EPSS 99%
- Public exploit or proof-of-concept code is available
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v2.0 (legacy)
- 4.3MEDIUMNVD never assigned a CVSS v3 rating to this CVE
- EG Score
- 4.3MEDIUMlow confidence
- EG Risk
- 59EG Risk 59/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity43% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 4.3 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation99% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 99%
- EPSS %ILE
- 99th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (4.3): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 4.3 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 4.3 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.NVD CVSS v2.0 · CVSS v2.0AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
- EG Likelihood
- 99% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-28). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
January 9, 2015
Last Modified
October 14, 2026
References (66)
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10679
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Apr/msg00001.htmlVendor Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-01/msg00021.htmlVendor Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-03/msg00027.htmlVendor Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-05/msg00026.htmlVendor Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00014.htmlVendor Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00015.htmlVendor Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00022.htmlVendor Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00031.htmlVendor Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-12/msg00000.htmlVendor Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-12/msg00001.htmlVendor Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-12/msg00003.htmlVendor Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-12/msg00004.htmlVendor Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-12/msg00006.htmlVendor Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-01/msg00005.htmlVendor Advisory
15 of 66 shown · show the other 51
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00011.htmlVendor Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=142496179803395&w=2Vendor Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=142496289803847&w=2Vendor Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=142720981827617&w=2Vendor Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=142721102728110&w=2Vendor Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=142895206924048&w=2Vendor Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=143213830203296&w=2Vendor Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=143748090628601&w=2Vendor Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=144043644216842&w=2Vendor Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=144050155601375&w=2Vendor Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=144050205101530&w=2Vendor Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=144050254401665&w=2Vendor Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=144050297101809&w=2Vendor Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0066.htmlVendor Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0800.htmlVendor Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0849.htmlVendor Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1650.htmlVendor Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://support.novell.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-0204.html
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20150310-sslVendor Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21883640
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://www-304.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21960769
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3125Vendor Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2015:019Vendor Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2015:062Vendor Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2015:063Vendor Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2016-2881720.html
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2018-4258247.html
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2017-3236626.html
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/bulletinapr2015-2511959.html
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/bulletinjan2015-2370101.html
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/cpuapr2015-2365600.html
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/cpujan2016-2367955.html
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/cpujul2015-2367936.html
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/cpuoct2015-2367953.html
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://www.securityfocus.com/bid/71936 (archived copy: the site no longer serves it)VDB Entry
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://www.securityfocus.com/bid/91787 (archived copy: the site no longer serves it)VDB Entry
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://www.securitytracker.com/id/1033378VDB Entry
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttps://bto.bluecoat.com/security-advisory/sa88
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttps://bto.bluecoat.com/security-advisory/sa91
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttps://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/99707VDB Entry
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttps://freakattack.com/Vendor Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttps://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/ce325c60c74b0fa784f5872404b722e120e5cab0
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttps://h20564.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c04773241
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttps://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=SB10102
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttps://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=SB10108
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttps://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=SB10110
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttps://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201503-11Vendor Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttps://support.apple.com/HT204659
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttps://support.citrix.com/article/CTX216642
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttps://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20150108.txtVendor Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttps://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20150319.txt
Vendor Advisories for CVE-2015-0204(2)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Patch Availability(6)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| ubuntu | libssl1.0.0 (1.0.1-4ubuntu5.21) @ precise | 2026-10-29 | ubuntu |
| redhat | openssl | 2016-08-22 | redhat |
| redhat | patch | 2015-05-13 | redhat |
| redhat | patch | 2015-04-16 | redhat |
| redhat | openssl-0:0.9.8e-33.el5_11 | 2015-04-13 | redhat |
| redhat | openssl-1:1.0.1e-34.el7_0.7 | 2015-01-21 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(6 across 6 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssl | — |
| — |
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssl | — |
| — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssl | — |
| — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssl | — |
| — |
Debian:6.0(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssl | 0.9.8o-4 ... 0.9.8o-4squeeze9 (18 versions) |
| — |
Debian:7(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssl | 1.0.1e-2 ... 1.0.1e-2+deb7u9 (14 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Additional Vendor Advisories
(4)
Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 6× in last 7d / 17× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 11 repeat rows among the latest 77 are merged into the row they repeat.
- 2026-10-29 14:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-29 14:23 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-29 14:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ff55-77ff-xv8x
- 2026-10-27 14:55 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-10-25 19:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 99% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-18 11:06 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-15 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 99% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-14 22:31 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-14 22:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ff55-77ff-xv8x
- 2026-10-14 22:25 UTCNVD update
- 2026-10-14 21:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-14 21:24 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-14 21:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ff55-77ff-xv8x
- 2026-10-14 21:24 UTCMITRE cvelistV5
- 2026-10-12 21:12 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 01:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 05:10 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-30 09:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-12 07:10 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-06 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 99% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-05 15:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 99% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-24 12:30 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-21 23:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 99% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-12 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 99% · 99th percentile
Show 41 moreShow fewer
- 2026-08-08 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 99% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-08 08:19 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-07 16:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 99% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-06 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 99% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-04 15:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 99% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-26 13:52 UTCEG score recomputeAssessed again: 4.3 MEDIUM
- 2026-07-23 01:21 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-23 01:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ff55-77ff-xv8x
- 2026-07-23 01:18 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-23 01:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ff55-77ff-xv8x
- 2026-07-23 01:17 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-23 01:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ff55-77ff-xv8x
- 2026-07-23 01:15 UTCEG score recompute▼ 9.00
- 2026-07-23 00:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 21:57 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-21 22:48 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-07-19 02:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 99% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-09 19:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 99% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-04 17:56 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-07-01 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 99% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-30 23:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 99% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-27 03:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 99% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 99% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-17 17:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 99% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-16 17:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 99% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-16 05:13 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-06-15 17:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 99% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-12 23:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 92% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-11 13:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 92% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-10 22:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 92% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-08 14:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 92% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-04 13:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 92% · 99th percentile
- 2026-05-29 13:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 92% · 99th percentile
- 2026-05-28 14:12 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-05-28 14:12 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-05-28 14:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ff55-77ff-xv8x
- 2026-05-28 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 92% · 99th percentile
- 2026-05-23 15:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 92% · 99th percentile
- 2026-05-22 21:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 92% · 99th percentile
- 2026-05-20 11:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 92% · 99th percentile
- 2026-05-18 21:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 92% · 99th percentile
Publicly available exploits
(4 references)Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 GitHub PoC), as are 3 GitHub checker repositories. A GitHub repository named or described as a checker or scanner checks whether a system is affected; it is not necessarily exploit code. Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.
- GitHub checkeranthophilee/A2SV--SSL-VUL-ScanPublished Jan 1, 2021
A2SV = Auto Scanning to SSL Vulnerability HeartBleed, CCS Injection, SSLv3 POODLE, FREAK... etc Support Vulnerability [CVE-2007-1858] Anonymous Cipher [CVE-2012-4929] CRIME(SPDY) [CVE-2014-0160] CCS Injection [CVE-2014-0224] HeartBleed [CVE-2014-3566] SSLv3 POODLE [CVE-2015-0204] FREAK Attack [CVE-2015-4000] LOGJAM Attack [CVE-2016-0800] SSLv2 DROWN Installation : $ apt update && apt upgrade $ apt install git $ apt install python2 $ apt install python $ git clone https://github.com/hahwul/ a2sv $ cd a2sv $ chmod +x * $ pip2 install -r requirements.txt usage : $ python2 a2sv.py -h It shows all commands how we can use this tool $ python a2sv.py -t 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 = target means here own device
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCAbhishekGhosh/FREAK-Attack-CVE-2015-0204-Testing-ScriptPublished Mar 6, 2015
Basic BASH Script to Automate OpenSSL based testing for FREAK Attack (CVE-2015-0204) as advised by Akamai.
Open source ↗ - GitHub checkerscottjpack/Freak-ScannerPublished Mar 5, 2015
Multithreaded FREAK scanner, used to detect SSL EXP Ciphers, vulnerable to CVE-2015-0204
Open source ↗ - GitHub checkerfelmoltor/FreakVulnCheckerPublished Mar 4, 2015
This script check if your list of server is accepting Export cipher suites and could be vulnerable to CVE-2015-0204
Open source ↗
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownDebian:6.0:openssl
- CVE-2015-4000NVD 3.7EG 9.0EPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2014-0224NVD 7.4EG 9.0EPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2015-1789NVD 7.5EG 8.7EPSS p100HIGH
- CVE-2014-8176EG 7.5EPSS p97HIGH
- CVE-2015-0292EG 7.5EPSS p99HIGH
- CVE-2014-3567EG 7.1EPSS p98HIGH
- CVE-2015-1791EG 6.8EPSS p97MEDIUM
- CVE-2015-0209EG 6.8EPSS p97MEDIUM
- CVE-2014-0195EG 6.8EPSS p100MEDIUM
- CVE-2015-3195NVD 5.3EG 5.9EPSS p99MEDIUM
Same vendor
10 shownredhat:RHSA-2015:0066 · redhat:RHSA-2016:1650 · redhat:RHSA-2015:0849
- CVE-2014-3570EG 5.0EPSS p98MEDIUM
- CVE-2014-8275EG 5.0EPSS p97MEDIUM
- CVE-2015-0206EG 5.0EPSS p99MEDIUM
- CVE-2015-0205EG 5.0EPSS p98MEDIUM
- CVE-2014-3572EG 5.0EPSS p94MEDIUM
- CVE-2014-3571EG 5.0EPSS p98MEDIUM
- CVE-2016-5387NVD 8.1EG 8.5EPSS p99HIGH
- CVE-2016-2105NVD 7.5EG 7.8EPSS p99HIGH
- CVE-2015-0226EG 7.5EPSS p93HIGH
- CVE-2016-3110EG 7.5EPSS p90HIGH
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-310
- CVE-2014-3566NVD 3.4EG 9.0EPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2015-4000NVD 3.7EG 9.0EPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2012-0059EG 4.9MEDIUM
- CVE-2014-8886EG 8.1EPSS p93HIGH
- CVE-2015-8281EG 7.5EPSS p90HIGH
- CVE-2015-7923EG 9.0CRITICAL
- CVE-2015-3197EG 5.9EPSS p96MEDIUM
- CVE-2015-5012EG 7.5HIGH
- CVE-2015-8803EG 9.8EPSS p91CRITICAL
- CVE-2015-8804EG 9.8EPSS p90CRITICAL
Frequently asked(4)
What is CVE-2015-0204?
When was CVE-2015-0204 made public?
Is CVE-2015-0204 actively exploited?
How do I remediate CVE-2015-0204?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2015-0204
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2015-0204?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.