The default configuration in Elasticsearch before 1.2 enables dynamic scripting, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary MVEL expressions and Java code via the source parameter to _search. NOTE: this only violates the vendor's intended security policy if the user does not run Elasticsearch in its own independent virtual machine.
CVE-2014-3120
Score elevated to 9.0 because this CVE is listed on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2022-03-25), indicating real-world exploitation has been confirmed by US federal agencies. NVD baseline CVSS 8.1 retained for reference. Confidence: HIGH.
- Actively exploited in the wild (CISA-KEV)
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 8.1
- EG Score
- 9.0CRITICALhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 81EG Risk 81/100CISA SSVC
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity90% × 45%Exploitation100% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 89%
- EPSS %ILE
- 99th
- KEV
- ⚠ Exploited
CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table
Published
July 28, 2014
Last Modified
April 22, 2026
Advisory Details (7)
Auto-updated May 19, 2026ElasticSearch - Remote Code Execution - Multiple webapps Exploit
http://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/33370How to Secure Elasticsearch | Elastic Blog
https://www.found.no/foundation/elasticsearch-security/#staying-safe-while-developing-with-elasticsearchLogstash 1.4.3 released | Elastic Blog
https://www.elastic.co/blog/logstash-1-4-3-releasedRapid7 Vulnerability Database
http://www.rapid7.com/db/modules/exploit/multi/elasticsearch/script_mvel_rcePatch Availability(3)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | katello-configure-0:1.4.5.1-3.el6sam | 2014-09-11 | redhat |
| redhat | patch | 2014-09-10 | redhat |
| redhat | patch | 2014-09-10 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Maven(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| org.elasticsearch:elasticsearch | 0.10.0 ... 1.3.9 (111 versions) |
| — |
All Vendor Advisories
(3)
Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 44× in last 7d / 201× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 907 total refreshes for this CVE.
- 2026-10-10 10:25 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 06:14 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 02:01 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 21:48 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 17:35 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 13:23 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 09:09 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 04:57 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 00:44 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-08 20:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-08 20:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-08 16:34 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-08 16:20 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-08 12:03 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-08 07:51 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-08 03:39 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 23:26 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 19:14 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 15:02 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 10:50 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 06:38 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 02:26 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 22:14 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 18:02 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 13:50 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-06 09:38 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 05:24 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 01:11 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 20:54 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 16:42 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 12:31 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 08:19 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 04:07 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 23:54 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 19:42 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 15:30 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 11:18 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 07:05 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 02:54 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 22:42 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 18:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-03 18:29 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 14:21 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-03 14:13 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 10:01 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 05:49 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 01:36 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 21:24 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 17:12 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 17:12 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 13:00 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 08:48 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 04:34 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 00:22 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 20:10 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 20:10 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 19:43 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-01 15:58 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 11:46 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 07:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 03:20 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 23:09 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 18:51 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 14:40 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 10:28 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 06:13 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 02:00 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-29 21:48 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-29 17:36 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-29 13:21 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-29 09:04 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-29 04:47 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-29 00:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-29 00:33 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-28 20:21 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-28 16:08 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-28 11:54 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-28 07:42 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-28 03:30 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-27 23:18 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-27 21:51 UTCCISA KEV update
- 2026-09-27 19:06 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-27 14:54 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-27 10:40 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-27 06:25 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-27 02:10 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-26 21:57 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-26 17:46 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-26 13:31 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-26 09:18 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-26 05:04 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-26 00:52 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-25 20:40 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-25 19:35 UTCCISA KEV update
- 2026-09-25 16:26 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-25 14:55 UTCCISA KEV update
- 2026-09-25 12:14 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-25 08:01 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-25 03:49 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-24 23:37 UTCVendor advisory
Publicly available exploits
(5 references)Working exploit code is in the public domain (1 Metasploit module) (1 GitHub PoC) (2 Exploit-DB entries). Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly — public PoCs typically lead to mass-exploitation within 24-72 hours.
- Exploit-DBEDB-33588✓ verifiedFirst seen May 30, 2014
ElasticSearch Dynamic Script - Arbitrary Java Execution (Metasploit)
Open source ↗ - Exploit-DBEDB-33370✓ verifiedFirst seen May 15, 2014
ElasticSearch - Remote Code Execution
Open source ↗ - Metasploitexploit/multi/elasticsearch/script_mvel_rce✓ verifiedFirst seen Dec 9, 2013
ElasticSearch Dynamic Script Arbitrary Java Execution
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCechohtp/ElasticSearch-CVE-2014-3120First seen Jul 7, 2014
POC Code to exploite CVE-2014-3120
Open source ↗ - Nucleihttp/cves/2014/CVE-2014-3120.yamlFirst seen Jan 1, 2014
ElasticSearch v1.1.1/1.2 RCE
Open source ↗
Related CVEs(same product)
Same product
10 shownMaven:org.elasticsearch:elasticsearch
Frequently asked(6)
What is CVE-2014-3120?
When was CVE-2014-3120 disclosed?
Is CVE-2014-3120 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2014-3120?
Which products are affected by CVE-2014-3120?
How do I remediate CVE-2014-3120?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2014-3120
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2014-3120?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.