CVE-2014-1692

HIGHNVD 7.37.3
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 7.3 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2022-05-13. NVD baseline CVSS 7.3; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
7.3EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan mitigationRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 4.6%CVSS: 7.3Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

No fix has been recorded since the CVE record was published in 2014 — use a compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and check the vendor's advisory.

The CVE record's description, written by its CNA (Red Hat, Inc.), states the affected versions: "The hash_buffer function in schnorr.c in OpenSSH through 6.4, when Makefile.inc is modified to enable the J-PAKE protocol, does not initialize certain data structures, which might allow remote attackers to cause a denia…" No release containing a fix is confirmed on record.

The hash_buffer function in schnorr.c in OpenSSH through 6.4, when Makefile.inc is modified to enable the J-PAKE protocol, does not initialize certain data structures, which might allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory corruption) or have unspecified other impact via vectors that trigger an error condition.

CVSS v3
7.3
EG Score
7.3HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
50
EG Risk 50/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity73% × 45%
The EG Score, 7.3 of 10.
Exploitation4.6% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: No fix has been recorded since the CVE record was published in 2014. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and check the vendor's advisory for a fix.
EPSS PROB
4.6%
EPSS %ILE
91st
KEV
Not listed

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

No fix has been recorded since the CVE record was published in 2014. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and check the vendor's advisory for a fix.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

January 29, 2014

Last Modified

May 28, 2026

References (11)

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2014-1692(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 21× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 85 of 126 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 15 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 41 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-12 21:19 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-12 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 91st percentile
  3. 2026-10-12 01:26 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-11 13:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 91st percentile
  5. 2026-10-10 19:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 91st percentile
  6. 2026-10-09 20:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 91st percentile
  7. 2026-10-08 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 91st percentile
  8. 2026-10-07 23:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 91st percentile
  9. 2026-10-06 15:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 91st percentile
  10. 2026-10-05 17:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 91st percentile
  11. 2026-10-04 23:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 91st percentile
  12. 2026-09-30 14:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 91st percentile
  13. 2026-09-30 00:20 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-09-28 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 91st percentile
  15. 2026-09-27 13:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 91st percentile
  16. 2026-09-26 15:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 91st percentile
  17. 2026-09-21 20:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 91st percentile
  18. 2026-09-20 20:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 91st percentile
  19. 2026-09-18 19:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 91st percentile
  20. 2026-09-17 19:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 91st percentile
  21. 2026-09-15 03:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 91st percentile
  22. 2026-09-12 14:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 91st percentile
  23. 2026-09-11 09:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 91st percentile
  24. 2026-09-07 15:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 91st percentile
  25. 2026-09-04 13:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 91st percentile
Show 60 more
  1. 2026-08-30 19:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 90th percentile
  2. 2026-08-27 14:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 90th percentile
  3. 2026-08-26 14:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 90th percentile
  4. 2026-08-25 13:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 90th percentile
  5. 2026-08-23 00:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 90th percentile
  6. 2026-08-21 23:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 90th percentile
  7. 2026-08-20 22:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 90th percentile
  8. 2026-08-19 16:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 90th percentile
  9. 2026-08-18 13:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 90th percentile
  10. 2026-08-16 14:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 90th percentile
  11. 2026-08-16 02:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 90th percentile
  12. 2026-08-15 01:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 90th percentile
  13. 2026-08-09 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 90th percentile
  14. 2026-08-08 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 90th percentile
  15. 2026-08-07 16:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 90th percentile
  16. 2026-08-06 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 90th percentile
  17. 2026-08-05 19:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 90th percentile
  18. 2026-08-04 15:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 90th percentile
  19. 2026-08-01 04:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 90th percentile
  20. 2026-07-30 16:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 90th percentile
  21. 2026-07-30 01:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 90th percentile
  22. 2026-07-28 15:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 90th percentile
  23. 2026-07-23 14:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 90th percentile
  24. 2026-07-23 01:12 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-07-23 00:15 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-07-22 21:54 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-07-22 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 90th percentile
  28. 2026-07-21 15:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 90th percentile
  29. 2026-07-20 17:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 90th percentile
  30. 2026-07-19 14:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 90th percentile
  31. 2026-07-19 02:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 90th percentile
  32. 2026-07-18 10:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 90th percentile
  33. 2026-07-16 16:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 90th percentile
  34. 2026-07-15 16:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 90th percentile
  35. 2026-07-15 01:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 90th percentile
  36. 2026-07-13 22:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 90th percentile
  37. 2026-07-13 06:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 90th percentile
  38. 2026-07-12 05:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 90th percentile
  39. 2026-07-09 19:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 90th percentile
  40. 2026-07-08 15:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 90th percentile
  41. 2026-07-07 13:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 90th percentile
  42. 2026-07-06 02:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 90th percentile
  43. 2026-07-05 02:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 90th percentile
  44. 2026-07-04 06:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 90th percentile
  45. 2026-07-02 15:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 90th percentile
  46. 2026-07-01 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 90th percentile
  47. 2026-06-30 23:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 90th percentile
  48. 2026-06-29 14:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 90th percentile
  49. 2026-06-28 04:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 90th percentile
  50. 2026-06-27 03:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 90th percentile
  51. 2026-06-25 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 90th percentile
  52. 2026-06-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 90th percentile
  53. 2026-06-23 21:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 90th percentile
  54. 2026-06-22 14:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 90th percentile
  55. 2026-06-21 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 90th percentile
  56. 2026-06-21 01:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 90th percentile
  57. 2026-06-19 19:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 90th percentile
  58. 2026-06-18 17:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 90th percentile
  59. 2026-06-17 17:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 90th percentile
  60. 2026-06-16 17:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 4.6% · 90th percentile

Related CVEs(same CWE)

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2014-1692?
CVE-2014-1692 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on January 29, 2014. The hash_buffer function in schnorr.c in OpenSSH through 6.4, when Makefile.inc is modified to enable the J-PAKE protocol, does not initialize certain data structures, which might allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory corruption) or have unspecified other impact via vectors…
When was CVE-2014-1692 made public?
CVE-2014-1692 was made public on January 29, 2014: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, Red Hat, Inc., gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on January 29, 2014. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of May 28, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2014-1692 actively exploited?
CVE-2014-1692 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 4.6% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (91st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2014-1692?
CVE-2014-1692 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.3 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2014-1692?
No fix for CVE-2014-1692 has been recorded since its CVE record was published in 2014. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation — for example, keep it off the internet or limit it to trusted networks — and check the vendor's advisory for a fix. The CVE record's description, written by its CNA (Red Hat, Inc.), states the affected versions: "The hash_buffer function in schnorr.c in OpenSSH through 6.4, when Makefile.inc is modified to enable the J-PAKE protocol, does not initialize certain data structures, which might allow remote attackers to cause a denia…" No release containing a fix is confirmed on record. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2014-1692 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2014-1692

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2014-1692?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.

Book a Demo →Browse All CVEs