CVE-2013-7108

MEDIUMCVSS v2 · 5.55.5—
EchelonGraph scoreLOW confidence

This CVE was only ever scored under CVSS v2.0. NVD CVSS v2.0 base 5.5 — v2 rates that MEDIUM (v2 bands: LOW 0.0–3.9 / MEDIUM 4.0–6.9 / HIGH 7.0–10.0; v2 has no CRITICAL band). Vector AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:P. CVSS v2 is an older, coarser metric than v3.1/v4.0 (no Scope, no User Interaction, no Attack Requirements), so it is not directly comparable to a v3 or v4 score. NVD has never re-scored this record under v3. EPSS predicts 59.5% exploitation probability in the next 30 days, which is reflected in EG Risk but does not lift the v2 base. Confidence: LOW.

Sources: epss, nvd_v2
Weaponized
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictPatch this weekExploitation is likely or a public exploit exists.
  • High exploitation likelihood — EPSS 60%
  • Public exploit code is available (Exploit-DB (verified), epss top5pct, epss high, public exploit)
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 60%CVSS v2: 5.5Exploit: Exploit-DB (verified) · epss top5pct · epss high · public exploitExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Multiple off-by-one errors in Nagios Core 3.5.1, 4.0.2, and earlier, and Icinga before 1.8.5, 1.9 before 1.9.4, and 1.10 before 1.10.2 allow remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive information from process memory or cause a denial of service (crash) via a long string in the last key value in the variable list to the process_cgivars function in (1) avail.c, (2) cmd.c, (3) config.c, (4) extinfo.c, (5) histogram.c, (6) notifications.c, (7) outages.c, (8) status.c, (9) statusmap.c, (10) summary.c, and (11) trends.c in cgi/, which triggers a heap-based buffer over-read.

CVSS v2.0 (legacy)
5.5MEDIUMNVD never assigned a CVSS v3 rating to this CVE
EG Score
5.5MEDIUMlow confidence
EG Risk
55
EG Risk 55/100CISA SSVC

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation65% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
CISA SSVC: Track at low, Track or Track* at medium and Track* or Attend at high mission impact.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
60%
EPSS %ILE
99th
KEV
Not listed

CISA SSVCTrack at low, Track or Track* at medium and Track* or Attend at high mission impact.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation public PoC (EG-KEV: weaponized) · Automatable unknown (not published for this CVE) · Technical impact unknown (not published for this CVE). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table

Published

January 15, 2014

Last Modified

April 29, 2026

References (26)

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntunagios3-core (3.5.1.dfsg-2.1ubuntu3.1) @ yakkety2026-05-28ubuntu

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(3 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:6.0(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
icinga1.0.2-2, 1.0.2-2+squeeze1
  • every version up to 1.0.2-2+squeeze2: fixed in 1.0.2-2+squeeze2
—
Debian:7(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
icinga1.7.1-6
  • every version up to 1.7.1-7: fixed in 1.7.1-7
—
Debian:8(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
nagios33.5.1.dfsg-2
  • every version up to 3.5.1.dfsg-2+deb8u1: fixed in 3.5.1.dfsg-2+deb8u1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(1)

Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 3× in last 7d / 12× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 117 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-10-04 23:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-30 14:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-09-30 00:17 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-09-27 13:39 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-09-26 15:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-09-21 20:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-09-20 20:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-09-18 19:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-09-17 19:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-09-15 03:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-09-12 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-09-11 09:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-09-04 13:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-08-30 19:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-08-27 14:20 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-08-26 14:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-08-21 23:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-08-20 22:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-08-19 16:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-08-18 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-16 14:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-16 02:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-08-15 01:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-08-07 16:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-08-06 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-04 15:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-30 16:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-30 01:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-28 15:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-26 13:49 UTCEG score recompute▲ 5.50
  6. 2026-07-23 14:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-23 01:11 UTCEG score recompute▼ 4.80
  8. 2026-07-23 00:14 UTCEG score recompute▲ 4.80
  9. 2026-07-22 21:53 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-07-22 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-21 15:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-21 15:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-20 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-20 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-19 14:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-19 14:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-19 02:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-16 16:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-15 16:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-15 16:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-15 01:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-13 22:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-13 06:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-09 19:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-08 15:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-07-02 15:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-07-01 15:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-30 23:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-28 04:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-28 04:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-27 03:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-25 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-25 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-23 21:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-23 21:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-22 14:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-22 14:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-21 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-21 01:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-21 01:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-18 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-18 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-17 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-17 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-16 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-16 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-16 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-15 17:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-14 23:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-13 22:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-12 23:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-11 13:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-10 22:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-10 13:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-06-08 14:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-06-07 15:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-06-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-06-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-06-05 22:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-06-05 22:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-06-05 06:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-06-05 06:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-06-04 13:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-06-04 13:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-06-02 20:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-06-02 20:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-05-31 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-05-31 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-05-29 13:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-05-29 13:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-05-28 20:55 UTCEG score recompute
  74. 2026-05-28 20:55 UTCVendor advisory
  75. 2026-05-28 20:55 UTCGHSA enrichment

Publicly available exploits

(1 reference)

Working exploit code is in the public domain (1 Exploit-DB entry). Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly — public PoCs typically lead to mass-exploitation within 24-72 hours.

  • Exploit-DBEDB-38882✓ verified
    First seen Dec 16, 2013

    Icinga - cgi/config.c process_cgivars Function Off-by-One Read Remote Denial of Service

    Open source ↗

Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2013-7108?
CVE-2013-7108 is a medium vulnerability published on January 15, 2014. Multiple off-by-one errors in Nagios Core 3.5.1, 4.0.2, and earlier, and Icinga before 1.8.5, 1.9 before 1.9.4, and 1.10 before 1.10.2 allow remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive information from process memory or cause a denial of service (crash) via a long string in the last key value in…
When was CVE-2013-7108 disclosed?
CVE-2013-7108 was first published on January 15, 2014, with the most recent update on April 29, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2013-7108 actively exploited?
CVE-2013-7108 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. EchelonGraph's EG-KEV model classifies it as weaponized: a functional public exploit exists. FIRST EPSS estimates a 60% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (99th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
How do I remediate CVE-2013-7108?
A fix for CVE-2013-7108 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2013-7108

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2013-7108?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.

Book a Demo →Browse All CVEs