nginx 0.8.41 through 1.4.3 and 1.5.x before 1.5.7 allows remote attackers to bypass intended restrictions via an unescaped space character in a URI.
CVE-2013-4547
This CVE was only ever scored under CVSS v2.0. NVD CVSS v2.0 base 7.5 — v2 rates that HIGH (v2 bands: LOW 0.0–3.9 / MEDIUM 4.0–6.9 / HIGH 7.0–10.0; v2 has no CRITICAL band). Vector AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P. CVSS v2 is an older, coarser metric than v3.1/v4.0 (no Scope, no User Interaction, no Attack Requirements), so it is not directly comparable to a v3 or v4 score. NVD has never re-scored this record under v3. EPSS predicts 67.7% exploitation probability in the next 30 days, which is reflected in EG Risk but does not lift the v2 base. Confidence: LOW.
- 11 internet-facing services (distinct ip:port) on record running an affected version — derived from Shodan data (© Shodan); a patched service can stay counted while its port stays open
- High exploitation likelihood — EPSS 68%
- Public exploit code is available (Exploit-DB, marked verified by Exploit-DB, other public proof-of-concept code)
A fix is available — apply it.
11 internet-facing services (distinct ip:port) on record running a version that maps to CVE-2013-4547, in our KEV-Exposure radar’s Shodan-derived sample.
How it counts: every 12 hours, when Shodan query credits allow, the radar runs one Shodan query per tracked product, reads up to 100 ip:port services per query, and keeps a service when its banner version matches a CISA-KEV or high-EPSS CVE; a service is dropped when neither a search nor a Shodan InternetDB port re-check has refreshed it for 21 days. A re-check that finds the port still listed by Shodan InternetDB refreshes the service without re-reading the banner, so a patched service can stay counted while its port stays open. A count is a banner-version inference over a sample, not an exploit test and not an internet-wide census, and the unit is a service, not a machine: a machine answering on two ports counts twice.
- CVSS v2.0 (legacy)
- 7.5HIGHNVD never assigned a CVSS v3 rating to this CVE
- EG Score
- 7.5HIGHlow confidence
- EG Risk
- 65EG Risk 65/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity75% × 45%The EG Score, 7.5 of 10.Exploitation68% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability30% × 15%EchelonGraph's default before algorithm v3.4: CISA had not published Automatable for this CVE.SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track or Track* at medium and Track* or Attend at high mission impact.Exploitation public PoC (EG-KEV: weaponized) · Automatable unknown (not published for this CVE) · Technical impact unknown (not published for this CVE). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 68%
- EPSS %ILE
- 99th
- KEV
- Not listed
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track or Track* at medium and Track* or Attend at high mission impact.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation public PoC (EG-KEV: weaponized) · Automatable unknown (not published for this CVE) · Technical impact unknown (not published for this CVE). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
Published
November 23, 2013
Last Modified
April 29, 2026
References (9)
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2013-12/msg00007.htmlMailing List · Third Party Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2013-11/msg00084.htmlMailing List · Third Party Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2013-11/msg00118.htmlMailing List · Third Party Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2013-11/msg00119.htmlMailing List · Third Party Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://mailman.nginx.org/pipermail/nginx-announce/2013/000125.htmlMitigation · Vendor Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://secunia.com/advisories/55757Third Party Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://secunia.com/advisories/55822Third Party Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://secunia.com/advisories/55825Third Party Advisory
- secalert@redhat · CVE Programhttp://www.debian.org/security/2012/dsa-2802Broken Link
Affected Packages
(5 across 5 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| nginx | — |
| — |
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| nginx | — |
| — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| nginx | — |
| — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| nginx | — |
| — |
Debian:7(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| nginx | 1.2.1-2.2, 1.2.1-2.2+wheezy1 |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 5× in last 7d / 17× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 83 of 86 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 17 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 3 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-11 13:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-08 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-30 14:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-30 01:09 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-30 00:13 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 13:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-21 20:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-20 20:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-18 19:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-17 19:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-15 03:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-13 16:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-12 14:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-11 09:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-11 00:23 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-04 13:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-30 19:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-26 14:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-23 15:52 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-21 23:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-20 22:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
Show 58 moreShow fewer
- 2026-08-19 16:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-16 02:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-07 16:49 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-07 16:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-06 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-05 19:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-30 16:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-30 01:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-28 15:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-26 13:48 UTCEG score recompute▲ 7.50
- 2026-07-23 01:10 UTCEG score recompute▼ 6.20
- 2026-07-23 00:14 UTCEG score recompute▲ 6.20
- 2026-07-22 21:52 UTCEG score recompute▼ 9.00
- 2026-07-22 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-22 09:37 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-07-21 15:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-20 17:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-19 02:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-16 16:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-15 16:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-13 22:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-13 06:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-12 05:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-09 19:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-08 15:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-07 13:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-05 04:51 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-07-05 02:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-02 15:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-01 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-30 23:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-29 14:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-28 14:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-27 03:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-25 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-23 21:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-18 17:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-17 17:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-16 17:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-16 16:09 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-06-15 17:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 68% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-14 23:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 91% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-13 22:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 91% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-12 23:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 91% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-10 22:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 91% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-10 13:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 91% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-08 14:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 91% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-07 15:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 91% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-05 22:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 91% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-05 06:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 91% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-04 13:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 91% · 99th percentile
- 2026-05-31 00:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 91% · 99th percentile
- 2026-05-28 21:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-05-28 21:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9x2q-qf8w-h347 · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-05-27 13:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 91% · 99th percentile
- 2026-05-26 13:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 91% · 99th percentile
- 2026-05-26 07:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 91% · 99th percentile
Publicly available exploits
(2 references)Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 Exploit-DB entry, 1 GitHub PoC). Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.
- Exploit-DBEDB-38846✓ verifiedPublished Nov 19, 2013
Nginx 1.1.17 - URI Processing SecURIty Bypass
Open source ↗ - Open source ↗GitHub PoCcyberharsh/Nginx-CVE-2013-4547Published Jun 20, 2020
Related CVEs(same product + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownDebian:7:nginx · Debian:11:nginx
- CVE-2016-0746EG 9.8EPSS p95CRITICAL
- CVE-2016-0742NVD 7.5EG 8.9EPSS p100HIGH
- CVE-2017-7529NVD 7.5EG 8.4EPSS p99HIGH
- CVE-2013-2070EG 5.8EPSS p96MEDIUM
- CVE-2016-0747EG 5.3EPSS p95MEDIUM
- CVE-2014-3616EG 4.3EPSS p93MEDIUM
- CVE-2017-20005EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2009-3555EG 9.8EPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2021-23017NVD 7.7EG 9.4EPSS p99CRITICAL
- CVE-2023-44487NVD 7.5EG 9.0 KEVEPSS p100CRITICAL
Frequently asked(4)
What is CVE-2013-4547?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2013-4547 published?
Is CVE-2013-4547 actively exploited?
How do I remediate CVE-2013-4547?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2013-4547
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2013-4547?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.