CVE-2013-1897

LOWCVSS v2 · 2.62.6
EchelonGraph scoreLOW confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS v2 base score.

This CVE was only ever scored under CVSS v2.0. NVD CVSS v2.0 base 2.6 — NVD rates that LOW (NVD's v2 bands: LOW 0.0–3.9 / MEDIUM 4.0–6.9 / HIGH 7.0–10.0; no CRITICAL band). Vector AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N. CVSS v2 is an older, coarser metric than v3.1/v4.0 (no Scope, no User Interaction, no Attack Requirements), so it is not directly comparable to a v3 or v4 score. NVD has never re-scored this record under v3. EPSS predicts 2.1% exploitation probability in the next 30 days; it does not lift the v2 base. EPSS sets EG Risk's exploitation input. Confidence: LOW.

Triggered by: NVD CVSS v2.0 (legacy fallback)
Sources: NVD CVSS v2.0
2.6EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 2.1%CVSS v2: 2.6Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

The do_search function in ldap/servers/slapd/search.c in 389 Directory Server 1.2.x before 1.2.11.20 and 1.3.x before 1.3.0.5 does not properly restrict access to entries when the nsslapd-allow-anonymous-access configuration is set to rootdse and the BASE search scope is used, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information outside of the rootDSE via a crafted LDAP search.

CVSS v2.0 (legacy)
2.6LOWNVD never assigned a CVSS v3 rating to this CVE
EG Score
2.6LOWlow confidence
EG Risk
13
EG Risk 13/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity26% × 45%
The EG Score, 2.6 of 10.
Exploitation2.1% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
2.1%
EPSS %ILE
81st
KEV
Not listed

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

May 13, 2013

Last Modified

April 29, 2026

References (6)

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhat389-ds-base-0:1.2.11.15-14.el6_42013-04-15redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(3 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
389-ds-base—
  • every version up to 1.3.2.9-1: fixed in 1.3.2.9-1
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
389-ds-base—
  • every version up to 1.3.2.9-1: fixed in 1.3.2.9-1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
389-ds-base—
  • every version up to 1.3.2.9-1: fixed in 1.3.2.9-1
—

All Vendor Advisories

(1)

Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 19× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 88 of 141 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 12 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 53 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-12 01:32 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-11 13:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 81st percentile
  3. 2026-10-10 19:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 81st percentile
  4. 2026-10-09 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 81st percentile
  5. 2026-10-08 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 81st percentile
  6. 2026-10-07 23:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 81st percentile
  7. 2026-10-06 15:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 81st percentile
  8. 2026-10-05 17:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 81st percentile
  9. 2026-10-04 23:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 81st percentile
  10. 2026-09-30 14:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 80th percentile
  11. 2026-09-30 10:17 UTCOSV refresh
  12. 2026-09-29 20:14 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-09-27 13:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 80th percentile
  14. 2026-09-26 15:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 80th percentile
  15. 2026-09-24 13:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 80th percentile
  16. 2026-09-18 19:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 80th percentile
  17. 2026-09-15 03:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 80th percentile
  18. 2026-09-13 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 80th percentile
  19. 2026-09-12 14:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 80th percentile
  20. 2026-09-11 17:10 UTCOSV refresh
  21. 2026-09-11 09:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 80th percentile
  22. 2026-09-07 15:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 80th percentile
  23. 2026-09-06 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 80th percentile
  24. 2026-09-05 15:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 80th percentile
  25. 2026-09-04 13:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 80th percentile
Show 63 more
  1. 2026-09-02 14:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 80th percentile
  2. 2026-09-01 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 80th percentile
  3. 2026-08-27 14:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 80th percentile
  4. 2026-08-26 14:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 80th percentile
  5. 2026-08-25 13:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 80th percentile
  6. 2026-08-24 07:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 79th percentile
  7. 2026-08-23 20:52 UTCOSV refresh
  8. 2026-08-21 23:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 80th percentile
  9. 2026-08-20 22:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 80th percentile
  10. 2026-08-19 16:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 80th percentile
  11. 2026-08-18 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 80th percentile
  12. 2026-08-16 02:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 80th percentile
  13. 2026-08-15 01:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 80th percentile
  14. 2026-08-12 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 79th percentile
  15. 2026-08-09 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 79th percentile
  16. 2026-08-08 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 79th percentile
  17. 2026-08-07 20:19 UTCOSV refresh
  18. 2026-08-07 16:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 79th percentile
  19. 2026-08-06 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 79th percentile
  20. 2026-08-05 19:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 79th percentile
  21. 2026-08-04 15:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 79th percentile
  22. 2026-08-02 02:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 79th percentile
  23. 2026-07-30 01:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 79th percentile
  24. 2026-07-28 15:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 79th percentile
  25. 2026-07-26 13:47 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 2.6 LOW
  26. 2026-07-25 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 79th percentile
  27. 2026-07-23 14:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 79th percentile
  28. 2026-07-23 01:09 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-07-23 00:13 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-07-22 21:51 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-07-22 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 79th percentile
  32. 2026-07-22 13:07 UTCOSV refresh
  33. 2026-07-21 15:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 79th percentile
  34. 2026-07-20 17:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 79th percentile
  35. 2026-07-19 14:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 79th percentile
  36. 2026-07-19 02:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 79th percentile
  37. 2026-07-18 10:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 79th percentile
  38. 2026-07-16 16:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 79th percentile
  39. 2026-07-15 16:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 79th percentile
  40. 2026-07-15 01:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 79th percentile
  41. 2026-07-13 22:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 79th percentile
  42. 2026-07-13 06:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 79th percentile
  43. 2026-07-11 08:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 79th percentile
  44. 2026-07-09 19:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 79th percentile
  45. 2026-07-08 15:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 79th percentile
  46. 2026-07-06 02:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 79th percentile
  47. 2026-07-05 08:29 UTCOSV refresh
  48. 2026-07-05 02:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 79th percentile
  49. 2026-07-04 06:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 79th percentile
  50. 2026-07-01 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 79th percentile
  51. 2026-06-30 23:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 79th percentile
  52. 2026-06-29 14:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 79th percentile
  53. 2026-06-28 14:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 79th percentile
  54. 2026-06-28 04:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 79th percentile
  55. 2026-06-27 03:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 79th percentile
  56. 2026-06-25 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 79th percentile
  57. 2026-06-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 79th percentile
  58. 2026-06-23 21:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 79th percentile
  59. 2026-06-22 14:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 79th percentile
  60. 2026-06-21 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 79th percentile
  61. 2026-06-19 19:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 79th percentile
  62. 2026-06-18 17:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 79th percentile
  63. 2026-06-17 17:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 79th percentile

Related CVEs(same product)

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2013-1897?
CVE-2013-1897 is a low-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on May 13, 2013. The do_search function in ldap/servers/slapd/search.c in 389 Directory Server 1.2.x before 1.2.11.20 and 1.3.x before 1.3.0.5 does not properly restrict access to entries when the nsslapd-allow-anonymous-access configuration is set to rootdse and the BASE search scope is used, which allows remote…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2013-1897 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2013-1897 was published on May 13, 2013. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of April 29, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2013-1897 actively exploited?
CVE-2013-1897 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 2.1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (81st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
How do I remediate CVE-2013-1897?
A fix for CVE-2013-1897 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2013-1897

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2013-1897?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.

Book a Demo →Browse All CVEs