The Sleuth Kit (TSK) 4.0.1 does not properly handle "." (dotfile) file system entries in FAT file systems and other file systems for which . is not a reserved name, which allows local users to hide activities it more difficult to conduct forensics activities, as demonstrated by Flame.
CVE-2012-5619
LOWCVSS v2 · 2.12.1—
EchelonGraph scoreLOW confidence
This CVE was only ever scored under CVSS v2.0. NVD CVSS v2.0 base 2.1 — v2 rates that LOW (v2 bands: LOW 0.0–3.9 / MEDIUM 4.0–6.9 / HIGH 7.0–10.0; v2 has no CRITICAL band). Vector AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N. CVSS v2 is an older, coarser metric than v3.1/v4.0 (no Scope, no User Interaction, no Attack Requirements), so it is not directly comparable to a v3 or v4 score. NVD has never re-scored this record under v3. EPSS predicts 0.4% exploitation probability in the next 30 days, which is reflected in EG Risk but does not lift the v2 base. Confidence: LOW.
Sources: epss, nvd_v2
2.1EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.4%CVSS v2: 2.1Exploit: None knownExposed services: —
A fix is available — apply it.
Internet exposure
The internet-exposure footprint is temporarily unavailable — the KEV-Exposure radar's record for this CVE could not be loaded just now. That is not a finding of zero exposed services; please retry shortly.
- CVSS v2.0 (legacy)
- 2.1LOWNVD never assigned a CVSS v3 rating to this CVE
- EG Score
- 2.1LOWlow confidence
- EG Risk
- 14EG Risk 14/100CISA SSVC
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity21% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability30% × 15%CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Track or Track* or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 0.4%
- EPSS %ILE
- 26th
- KEV
- Not listed
CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track or Track* or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation none (no KEV listing, exploit record or EPSS ≥ 50%) · Automatable unknown (not published for this CVE) · Technical impact unknown (not published for this CVE). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table
Published
September 29, 2014
Last Modified
May 6, 2026
References (14)
- secalert@redhathttp://labs.bitdefender.com/2012/06/flame-the-story-of-leaked-data-carried-by-human-vector/
- secalert@redhathttp://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2013-January/097289.html
- secalert@redhathttp://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2013-January/097293.html
- secalert@redhathttp://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2013:125
- secalert@redhathttp://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/12/01/2
- secalert@redhathttp://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/12/04/2
- secalert@redhathttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883330
- af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://labs.bitdefender.com/2012/06/flame-the-story-of-leaked-data-carried-by-human-vector/
- af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2013-January/097289.html
- af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2013-January/097293.html
- af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2013:125
- af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/12/01/2
- af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/12/04/2
- af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883330
Vendor Advisories for CVE-2012-5619
Vendor advisories for this CVE are temporarily unavailable — the list could not be loaded just now. That is not a sign that none exist; please retry shortly.
Related CVEs
Related CVEs are temporarily unavailable — the same-product, same-vendor and same-CWE lists could not be loaded just now. That is not a sign that none exist; please retry shortly.
Frequently asked(4)
What is CVE-2012-5619?
CVE-2012-5619 is a low vulnerability published on September 29, 2014. The Sleuth Kit (TSK) 4.0.1 does not properly handle "." (dotfile) file system entries in FAT file systems and other file systems for which . is not a reserved name, which allows local users to hide activities it more difficult to conduct forensics activities, as demonstrated by Flame.
When was CVE-2012-5619 disclosed?
CVE-2012-5619 was first published on September 29, 2014, with the most recent update on May 6, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2012-5619 actively exploited?
CVE-2012-5619 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.4% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (26th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
How do I remediate CVE-2012-5619?
A fix for CVE-2012-5619 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory.
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2012-5619
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2012-5619?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.