Unspecified vulnerability in Adobe Flash Player before 11.3.300.271 on Windows and Mac OS X and before 11.2.202.238 on Linux allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (application crash) via crafted SWF content, as exploited in the wild in August 2012 with SWF content in a Word document.
CVE-2012-1535
“▲” beside the score: it is higher than NVD's CVSS score.
Score elevated to 9.0 because this CVE is listed on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2022-03-03), indicating real-world exploitation has been confirmed by US federal agencies. NVD baseline CVSS 7.8 retained for reference. Confidence: HIGH.
- Actively exploited in the wild (CISA-KEV) — the reason this is sooner than the SSVC decision on this page at low or medium mission impact
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 7.8
- EG Score
- 9.0CRITICALhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 81EG Risk 81/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity90% × 45%The EG Score, 9.0 of 10.Exploitation100% × 40%Fixed at 100% for a CISA KEV listing: EchelonGraph's rule.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Attend at medium and Act at high mission impact.Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low, sooner than that at medium and as soon as possible at high mission impact. - EPSS PROB
- 70%
- EPSS %ILE
- 99th
- KEV
- ⚠ Exploited
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Attend at medium and Act at high mission impact.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low, sooner than that at medium and as soon as possible at high mission impact.
Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 14 days if it is not.
In CISA KEV yes (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
CISA required action“The impacted product is end-of-life and should be disconnected if still in use.”
Quoted verbatim from CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. CISA directs it at US federal civilian executive branch agencies under Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 26-04, which replaced BOD 22-01 on 10 June 2026; it is not EchelonGraph's advice. CISA's notes: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-1535
Published
August 15, 2012
Last Modified
April 22, 2026
Advisory Details (3)
Auto-updated Oct 12, 2026'[security bulletin] HPSBMU02948 rev.1 - HP Systems Insight Manager (SIM) Running on Linux and Window' - MARC
http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=139455789818399&w=2Adobe Flash Player: Multiple vulnerabilities (GLSA 201209-01) — Gentoo security
http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-201209-01.xmlPatch Availability(2)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | flash-plugin-0:11.2.202.238-1.el5 | 2012-08-23 | redhat |
| redhat | flash-plugin-0:11.2.202.238-1.el6 | 2012-08-15 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
All Vendor Advisories
(2)
Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 91× in last 7d / 396× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 1,760 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 1,660 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-12 06:44 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-12 06:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5876-f5vv-fv9w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-12 02:36 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-12 02:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5876-f5vv-fv9w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-11 22:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 22:28 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 22:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5876-f5vv-fv9w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-11 18:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 18:21 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 18:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5876-f5vv-fv9w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-11 14:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:15 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 14:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5876-f5vv-fv9w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-11 10:10 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 10:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5876-f5vv-fv9w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-11 06:04 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 06:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5876-f5vv-fv9w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-11 01:57 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 01:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5876-f5vv-fv9w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-10 21:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-10 21:51 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 21:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5876-f5vv-fv9w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-10 19:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 70% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-10 17:45 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 17:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5876-f5vv-fv9w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-10 13:39 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 13:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5876-f5vv-fv9w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-10 09:33 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 09:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5876-f5vv-fv9w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-10 05:27 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 05:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5876-f5vv-fv9w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-10 01:20 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 01:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5876-f5vv-fv9w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-09 21:14 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 21:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5876-f5vv-fv9w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-09 17:08 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 17:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5876-f5vv-fv9w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-09 13:00 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 13:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5876-f5vv-fv9w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-09 08:54 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 08:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5876-f5vv-fv9w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-09 04:47 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 04:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5876-f5vv-fv9w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-09 00:41 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 00:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5876-f5vv-fv9w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-08 20:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-08 20:35 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-08 20:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5876-f5vv-fv9w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-08 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 70% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-08 16:30 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-08 16:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5876-f5vv-fv9w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-08 12:23 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-08 12:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5876-f5vv-fv9w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-08 08:17 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-08 08:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5876-f5vv-fv9w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-08 04:09 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-08 04:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5876-f5vv-fv9w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-08 00:04 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-08 00:04 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-08 00:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5876-f5vv-fv9w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-07 23:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 70% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-07 19:57 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 19:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5876-f5vv-fv9w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-07 15:51 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 15:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5876-f5vv-fv9w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-07 11:45 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 11:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5876-f5vv-fv9w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-07 07:37 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 07:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5876-f5vv-fv9w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-07 03:31 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 03:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5876-f5vv-fv9w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-06 23:21 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 23:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5876-f5vv-fv9w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-06 19:16 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 19:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5876-f5vv-fv9w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-06 15:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-06 15:11 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 15:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5876-f5vv-fv9w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-06 15:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 70% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-06 11:02 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 11:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5876-f5vv-fv9w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-06 06:56 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 06:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5876-f5vv-fv9w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-06 02:50 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 02:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5876-f5vv-fv9w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-05 22:44 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 22:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5876-f5vv-fv9w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-05 18:36 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 18:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5876-f5vv-fv9w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-05 14:30 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 14:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5876-f5vv-fv9w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-05 10:25 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 10:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5876-f5vv-fv9w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-05 06:19 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 06:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5876-f5vv-fv9w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-05 02:13 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 02:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5876-f5vv-fv9w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-04 22:04 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 22:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5876-f5vv-fv9w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-04 17:58 UTCVendor advisory
Publicly available exploits
(2 references)Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 Metasploit module, 1 Exploit-DB entry). Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.
- Exploit-DBEDB-20624✓ verifiedPublished Aug 20, 2012
Adobe Flash Player 11.3 - Font Parsing Code Execution (Metasploit)
Open source ↗ - Metasploitexploit/windows/browser/adobe_flash_otf_font✓ verifiedPublished Aug 20, 2012
Adobe Flash Player 11.3 Kern Table Parsing Integer Overflow
Open source ↗
Related CVEs(same vendor + same CWE)
Same vendor
6 shownredhat:RHSA-2012:1173
Frequently asked(6)
What is CVE-2012-1535?
When was CVE-2012-1535 made public?
Is CVE-2012-1535 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2012-1535?
Which products are affected by CVE-2012-1535?
How do I remediate CVE-2012-1535?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2012-1535
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2012-1535?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.