The TAR file parser in Avira AntiVir 7.11.1.163, Antiy Labs AVL SDK 2.0.3.7, avast! Antivirus 4.8.1351.0 and 5.0.677.0, AVG Anti-Virus 10.0.0.1190, Bitdefender 7.2, Quick Heal (aka Cat QuickHeal) 11.00, ClamAV 0.96.4, Command Antivirus 5.2.11.5, Emsisoft Anti-Malware 5.1.0.1, eSafe 7.0.17.0, F-Prot Antivirus 4.6.2.117, G Data AntiVirus 21, Ikarus Virus Utilities T3 Command Line Scanner 1.1.97.0, Jiangmin Antivirus 13.0.900, K7 AntiVirus 9.77.3565, Kaspersky Anti-Virus 7.0.0.125, McAfee Anti-Virus Scanning Engine 5.400.0.1158, McAfee Gateway (formerly Webwasher) 2010.1C, Antimalware Engine 1.1.6402.0 in Microsoft Security Essentials 2.0, NOD32 Antivirus 5795, Norman Antivirus 6.06.12, PC Tools AntiVirus 7.0.3.5, Rising Antivirus 22.83.00.03, AVEngine 20101.3.0.103 in Symantec Endpoint Protection 11, Trend Micro AntiVirus 9.120.0.1004, Trend Micro HouseCall 9.120.0.1004, VBA32 3.12.14.2, and VirusBuster 13.6.151.0 allows remote attackers to bypass malware detection via a TAR archive entry with a length field that exceeds the total TAR file size. NOTE: this may later be SPLIT into multiple CVEs if additional information is published showing that the error occurred independently in different TAR parser implementations.
CVE-2012-1457
This CVE was only ever scored under CVSS v2.0. NVD CVSS v2.0 base 4.3 — v2 rates that MEDIUM (v2 bands: LOW 0.0–3.9 / MEDIUM 4.0–6.9 / HIGH 7.0–10.0; v2 has no CRITICAL band). Vector AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N. CVSS v2 is an older, coarser metric than v3.1/v4.0 (no Scope, no User Interaction, no Attack Requirements), so it is not directly comparable to a v3 or v4 score. NVD has never re-scored this record under v3. EPSS predicts 98.3% exploitation probability in the next 30 days, which is reflected in EG Risk but does not lift the v2 base. Confidence: LOW.
- High exploitation likelihood — EPSS 98%
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v2.0 (legacy)
- 4.3MEDIUMNVD never assigned a CVSS v3 rating to this CVE
- EG Score
- 4.3(low)
- EG Risk
- 63(Track)EG Risk 63/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity43% × 45%Exploitation98% × 40%Automatability30% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 98%
- EPSS %ILE
- 100%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
March 21, 2012
Last Modified
April 29, 2026
References (32)
- cve@mitrehttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-07/msg00002.html
- cve@mitrehttp://osvdb.org/80389
- cve@mitrehttp://osvdb.org/80391
- cve@mitrehttp://osvdb.org/80392
- cve@mitrehttp://osvdb.org/80393
- cve@mitrehttp://osvdb.org/80395
- cve@mitrehttp://osvdb.org/80396
- cve@mitrehttp://osvdb.org/80403
- cve@mitrehttp://osvdb.org/80406
- cve@mitrehttp://osvdb.org/80407
- cve@mitrehttp://osvdb.org/80409
- cve@mitrehttp://www.ieee-security.org/TC/SP2012/program.html
- cve@mitrehttp://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2012:094
- cve@mitrehttp://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/522005
- cve@mitrehttp://www.securityfocus.com/bid/52610
Patch Availability(1)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fixed in / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| ubuntu | clamav-daemon (0.97.5+dfsg-1ubuntu0.12.04.1) @ precise | 2026-07-23 | ubuntu |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| clamav | — | 0.97.5+dfsg-1 | — |
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| clamav | — | 0.97.5+dfsg-1 | — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| clamav | — | 0.97.5+dfsg-1 | — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| clamav | — | 0.97.5+dfsg-1 | — |
All Vendor Advisories
(1)
Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 1× in last 7d / 3× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-08-24 12:30 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-08 16:31 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-08 08:19 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-07-28 15:31 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-26 13:45 UTCEG score recompute▲ 4.30
- 2026-07-23 01:11 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-23 01:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-23 01:09 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-23 01:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-23 01:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-23 01:06 UTCEG score recompute▼ 9.00
- 2026-07-23 00:10 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 21:32 UTCEG score recompute▲ 9.00
- 2026-07-22 21:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-22 21:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-22 20:20 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-07-15 16:54 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-15 16:54 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-08 15:10 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-08 15:10 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-05 15:59 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-06-27 03:05 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-27 03:05 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-22 14:22 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-22 14:22 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 44 moreShow fewer
- 2026-06-18 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-18 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-17 03:05 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-06-15 17:44 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-13 22:57 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-12 23:08 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-11 13:56 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-10 22:14 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-10 13:18 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-07 15:22 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-07 15:22 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-05 22:44 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-05 22:44 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-05 06:08 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-05 06:08 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-04 13:09 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-02 20:10 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-02 20:10 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-01 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-31 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-31 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-31 00:14 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-31 00:14 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-29 13:41 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-29 05:03 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-05-29 05:03 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-05-29 05:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-05-28 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-28 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-27 13:38 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-27 13:38 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-26 13:41 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-26 13:41 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-22 21:15 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-22 21:15 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-22 21:15 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-21 22:39 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-20 11:21 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-20 11:21 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-20 11:21 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-18 21:29 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-18 21:29 UTCEPSS rescore
Frequently asked(4)
What is CVE-2012-1457?
When was CVE-2012-1457 disclosed?
Is CVE-2012-1457 actively exploited?
How do I remediate CVE-2012-1457?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2012-1457
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2012-1457?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.