CVE-2011-1652

NONECVSS 0.0Elevated
0.0
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • No confirmed exploitation signals yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: 12%CVSS: Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

The default configuration of Microsoft Windows 7 immediately prefers a new IPv6 and DHCPv6 service over a currently used IPv4 and DHCPv4 service upon receipt of an IPv6 Router Advertisement (RA), and does not provide an option to ignore an unexpected RA, which allows remote attackers to conduct man-in-the-middle attacks on communication with external IPv4 servers via vectors involving RAs, a DHCPv6 server, and NAT-PT on the local network, aka a "SLAAC Attack." NOTE: it can be argued that preferring IPv6 complies with RFC 3484, and that attempting to determine the legitimacy of an RA is currently outside the scope of recommended behavior of host operating systems

CVSS v3
EG Score
0.0(none)
EPSS
95.7%
KEV
Not listed

Published

April 6, 2011

Last Modified

April 29, 2026

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 41× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-07-06 16:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-06 02:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-06 02:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-05 02:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-04 06:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-02 14:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-01 15:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-01 15:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-06-30 23:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-06-30 23:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-06-28 14:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-06-28 04:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-06-28 04:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-06-27 03:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-27 03:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-25 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-23 21:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-23 21:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-22 14:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-22 14:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-21 01:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-21 01:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-18 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 56 more
  1. 2026-06-18 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-06-17 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-06-17 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-06-17 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-06-16 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-06-15 17:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-06-14 23:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-06-14 23:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-06-13 22:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-06-13 22:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-06-12 23:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-06-11 13:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-06-10 22:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-06-10 13:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-08 14:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-08 14:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-07 15:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-07 15:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-06 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-05 22:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-04 13:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-04 13:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-02 20:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-02 20:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-01 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-01 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-05-31 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-05-31 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-05-31 00:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-05-31 00:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-05-29 13:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-05-29 13:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-05-29 08:21 UTCEG score recompute
  35. 2026-05-29 08:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  36. 2026-05-28 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-05-28 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-05-28 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-05-27 13:38 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-05-27 13:38 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-05-26 13:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-05-26 13:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-05-26 07:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-05-26 07:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-05-24 16:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-05-22 21:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-05-22 21:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-05-22 21:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-05-20 22:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-05-20 22:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-05-20 22:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-05-20 11:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-05-20 11:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-05-20 11:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-05-18 21:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-05-18 21:29 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2011-1652?
CVE-2011-1652 is a none vulnerability published on April 6, 2011. The default configuration of Microsoft Windows 7 immediately prefers a new IPv6 and DHCPv6 service over a currently used IPv4 and DHCPv4 service upon receipt of an IPv6 Router Advertisement (RA), and does not provide an option to ignore an unexpected RA, which allows remote attackers to conduct…
When was CVE-2011-1652 disclosed?
CVE-2011-1652 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on April 6, 2011, with the most recent update on April 29, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2011-1652 actively exploited?
CVE-2011-1652 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 95.7% percentile likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days — higher percentiles indicate greater predicted risk.
How do I remediate CVE-2011-1652?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2011-1652, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2011-1652

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2011-1652?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.