The client in HP Data Protector does not properly validate EXEC_CMD arguments, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary Perl code via a crafted command, related to the "local bin directory."
Loading...
Loading...
Score elevated to 9.0 because EPSS predicts 90% probability of exploitation within the next 30 days (top 0.4% of all CVEs). Confidence: see factors.
The client in HP Data Protector does not properly validate EXEC_CMD arguments, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary Perl code via a crafted command, related to the "local bin directory."
February 9, 2011
April 29, 2026
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Every time one of our enrichment pipelines (NVD, MITRE cvelistV5, EPSS, CISA KEV, GHSA, OSV, vendor advisories) ran against this CVE. Most recent first.
Working exploit code is in the public domain (2 Metasploit modules) (5 Exploit-DB entries). Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly — public PoCs typically lead to mass-exploitation within 24-72 hours.
HP Data Protector - Remote Command Execution
Open source ↗HP Data Protector 6.1 - EXEC_CMD Remote Code Execution (Metasploit)
Open source ↗HP Data Protector (Linux) - Remote Command Execution
Open source ↗HP Data Protector (HP-UX) - Remote Shell
Open source ↗HP Data Protector Client 6.11 - 'EXEC_CMD' Remote Code Execution
Open source ↗HP Data Protector 6 EXEC_CMD Remote Code Execution
Open source ↗HP Data Protector 6.1 EXEC_CMD Command Execution
Open source ↗See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2011-0923
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.
CWE-20