CVE-2010-5333

CRITICALNVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

This critical-severity CVE scores 9.8 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 16% (96th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from NVD CVSS v3
Sources: EPSS, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — 3 sources updated this weekWeaponized
9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan mitigationRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Public exploit code is available (Metasploit)
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 16%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: MetasploitExposed services: Not assessed

No fix has been recorded since the CVE record was published in 2019 — if the vendor still supports the product, apply the fixed version it names; if not, isolate the affected system (restrict network access to it, for example with a firewall, or keep it off the internet) or retire the product.

The CVE record's description, written by its CNA (MITRE Corporation), states the affected versions: "The web server in Integard Pro and Home before 2.0.0.9037 and 2.2.x before 2.2.0.9037 has a buffer overflow via a long password in an administration login POST request, leading to arbitrary code execution." No release containing a fix is confirmed on record.

The web server in Integard Pro and Home before 2.0.0.9037 and 2.2.x before 2.2.0.9037 has a buffer overflow via a long password in an administration login POST request, leading to arbitrary code execution. An SEH-overwrite buffer overflow already existed for the vulnerable software. This CVE is to track an alternate exploitation method, utilizing an EIP-overwrite buffer overflow.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
70
EG Risk 70/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation65% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 2 (Weaponized): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
Exploitation public PoC (exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: No fix has been recorded since the CVE record was published in 2019. If the vendor still supports the product, apply the fixed version it names within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high; if it no longer does, isolate the affected system (restrict network access to it, for example with a firewall, or keep it off the internet) or retire the product.
EPSS PROB
16%
EPSS %ILE
96th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.NVD CVSS v3 · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
EG Likelihood
16% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-22). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track* at medium mission impactTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.

No fix has been recorded since the CVE record was published in 2019. If the vendor still supports the product, apply the fixed version it names within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high; if it no longer does, isolate the affected system (restrict network access to it, for example with a firewall, or keep it off the internet) or retire the product.

Exploitation public PoC (exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

September 13, 2019

Last Modified

November 21, 2024

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Oct 7, 2026
No fix on record since 2019.
Web page

Integard Pro 2.2.0.9026 - Windows 7 ROP-Code (Metasploit) - Windows remote Exploit

https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/15016
Web page

Integard Home and Pro 2 - Remote HTTP Buffer Overflow - Windows_x86 remote Exploit

https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/14941
Web page

Rolling Slots Casino Real Money Pokies and Live Games in Australia

https://purpl3f0xsec.tech/2019/08/04/osce-prep-integard.html
Web page

metasploit-framework/modules/exploits/windows/http/integard_password_bof.rb at master · rapid7/metasploit-framework · GitHub

https://github.com/rapid7/metasploit-framework/blob/master/modules/exploits/windows/http/integard_password_bof.rb
Web page

OSCE-prep/eip_integard.py at master · purpl3f0xsecur1ty/OSCE-prep · GitHub

https://github.com/purpl3-f0x/OSCE-prep/blob/master/eip_integard.py

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 18× in last 7d / 43× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 90 of 128 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 10 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 38 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-22 21:49 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-22 21:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qvc6-mjf5-whqr · GitHub severity HIGH
  3. 2026-10-22 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
  4. 2026-10-21 19:34 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-21 19:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qvc6-mjf5-whqr · GitHub severity HIGH
  6. 2026-10-21 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
  7. 2026-10-20 17:18 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-20 17:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qvc6-mjf5-whqr · GitHub severity HIGH
  9. 2026-10-20 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
  10. 2026-10-19 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
  11. 2026-10-19 15:02 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-19 15:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qvc6-mjf5-whqr · GitHub severity HIGH
  13. 2026-10-18 12:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qvc6-mjf5-whqr · GitHub severity HIGH
  14. 2026-10-18 11:34 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-17 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
  16. 2026-10-17 10:01 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-17 10:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qvc6-mjf5-whqr · GitHub severity HIGH
  18. 2026-10-16 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
  19. 2026-10-16 07:44 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-16 07:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qvc6-mjf5-whqr · GitHub severity HIGH
  21. 2026-10-15 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
  22. 2026-10-15 05:28 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-15 05:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qvc6-mjf5-whqr · GitHub severity HIGH
  24. 2026-10-14 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
  25. 2026-10-14 01:09 UTCEG score recompute
Show 65 more
  1. 2026-10-14 01:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qvc6-mjf5-whqr · GitHub severity HIGH
  2. 2026-10-13 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
  3. 2026-10-12 21:16 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-12 21:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qvc6-mjf5-whqr · GitHub severity HIGH
  5. 2026-10-12 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
  6. 2026-10-12 01:45 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-11 13:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
  8. 2026-10-10 19:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
  9. 2026-10-09 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
  10. 2026-10-08 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
  11. 2026-10-07 23:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
  12. 2026-10-06 15:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
  13. 2026-10-05 17:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
  14. 2026-09-30 14:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
  15. 2026-09-29 08:13 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-09-27 13:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
  17. 2026-09-26 15:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
  18. 2026-09-24 13:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
  19. 2026-09-16 13:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
  20. 2026-09-15 03:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
  21. 2026-09-13 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
  22. 2026-09-12 14:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
  23. 2026-09-06 13:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
  24. 2026-09-05 15:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
  25. 2026-09-04 13:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
  26. 2026-08-25 13:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
  27. 2026-08-19 16:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
  28. 2026-08-18 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
  29. 2026-08-15 01:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
  30. 2026-08-08 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
  31. 2026-08-06 13:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
  32. 2026-08-05 19:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
  33. 2026-08-04 15:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
  34. 2026-08-01 04:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
  35. 2026-07-30 01:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
  36. 2026-07-23 14:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
  37. 2026-07-23 01:04 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-07-23 00:39 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-07-23 00:07 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-07-22 21:46 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-07-22 14:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
  42. 2026-07-21 15:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
  43. 2026-07-20 17:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
  44. 2026-07-19 02:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
  45. 2026-07-18 10:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
  46. 2026-07-16 16:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
  47. 2026-07-15 16:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
  48. 2026-07-15 01:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
  49. 2026-07-13 22:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
  50. 2026-07-13 06:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
  51. 2026-07-11 08:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
  52. 2026-07-08 15:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
  53. 2026-07-06 16:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
  54. 2026-07-05 02:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
  55. 2026-07-04 06:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
  56. 2026-07-02 14:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
  57. 2026-07-01 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
  58. 2026-06-29 14:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
  59. 2026-06-28 14:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
  60. 2026-06-28 04:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
  61. 2026-06-27 03:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
  62. 2026-06-25 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
  63. 2026-06-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
  64. 2026-06-23 21:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile
  65. 2026-06-21 01:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 16% · 96th percentile

Publicly available exploits

(1 reference)

Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 Metasploit module). No fix has been recorded since the CVE record was published in 2019. If the vendor still supports the product, apply the fixed version it names; if it no longer does, isolate the affected system or retire the product.

  • Metasploitexploit/windows/http/integard_password_bof✓ verified
    Published Sep 9, 2010

    Race River Integard Home/Pro LoginAdmin Password Stack Buffer Overflow

    Open source ↗

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2010-5333?
CVE-2010-5333 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on September 13, 2019. The web server in Integard Pro and Home before 2.0.0.9037 and 2.2.x before 2.2.0.9037 has a buffer overflow via a long password in an administration login POST request, leading to arbitrary code execution. An SEH-overwrite buffer overflow already existed for the vulnerable software. This CVE is to…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2010-5333 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2010-5333 was published on September 13, 2019. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 21, 2024; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2010-5333 actively exploited?
CVE-2010-5333 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. EchelonGraph's EG-KEV model places it in Tier 2 (Weaponized), which is not evidence of exploitation: a Metasploit module exists for it. EchelonGraph does not test whether exploit code works. FIRST EPSS estimates a 16% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (96th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2010-5333?
CVE-2010-5333 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2010-5333?
No fix for CVE-2010-5333 has been recorded since its CVE record was published in 2019. If the vendor still supports the product, apply the fixed version it names; if it no longer does, isolate the affected system (restrict network access to it, for example with a firewall, or keep it off the internet) or retire the product. The CVE record's description, written by its CNA (MITRE Corporation), states the affected versions: "The web server in Integard Pro and Home before 2.0.0.9037 and 2.2.x before 2.2.0.9037 has a buffer overflow via a long password in an administration login POST request, leading to arbitrary code execution." No release containing a fix is confirmed on record.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2010-5333

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2010-5333?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.