Race condition in Avira Premium Security Suite 10.0.0.536 on Windows XP allows local users to bypass kernel-mode hook handlers, and execute dangerous code that would otherwise be blocked by a handler but not blocked by signature-based malware detection, via certain user-space memory changes during hook-handler execution, aka an argument-switch attack or a KHOBE attack. NOTE: this issue is disputed by some third parties because it is a flaw in a protection mechanism for situations where a crafted program has already begun to execute
CVE-2010-5153
“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.
Score 5.3 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2022-05-17. NVD baseline CVSS 5.3; sources differ by 0.0.
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
No fix has been recorded since the CVE record was published in 2012 — if the vendor still supports the product, apply the fixed version it names; if not, isolate the affected system (restrict network access to it, for example with a firewall, or keep it off the internet) or retire the product.
- CVSS v3
- 5.3
- EG Score
- 5.3MEDIUMmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 24EG Risk 24/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity53% × 45%The EG Score, 5.3 of 10.Exploitation0.7% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: No fix has been recorded since the CVE record was published in 2012. If the vendor still supports the product, apply the fixed version it names within your standard update timelines; if it no longer does, isolate the affected system (restrict network access to it, for example with a firewall, or keep it off the internet) or retire the product. - EPSS PROB
- 0.7%
- EPSS %ILE
- 51st
- KEV
- Not listed
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
No fix has been recorded since the CVE record was published in 2012. If the vendor still supports the product, apply the fixed version it names within your standard update timelines; if it no longer does, isolate the affected system (restrict network access to it, for example with a firewall, or keep it off the internet) or retire the product.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
August 25, 2012
Last Modified
April 29, 2026
Advisory Details (5)
Auto-updated May 29, 2026New attack bypasses virtually all AV protection
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/05/07/argument_switch_av_bypass/Learn Bitcoin, buy Bitcoin
http://matousec.com/info/articles/khobe-8.0-earthquake-for-windows-desktop-security-software.phpLearn Bitcoin, buy Bitcoin
http://matousec.com/info/advisories/khobe-8.0-earthquake-for-windows-desktop-security-software.phpResearch, News, and Perspectives | Trend Micro (US)
http://countermeasures.trendmicro.eu/you-just-cant-trust-a-drunk/Weakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 20× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 79 of 121 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 21 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 42 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-12 01:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-10-10 19:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-10-08 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-09-30 14:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-09-29 08:13 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-09-27 13:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-09-24 13:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-09-20 20:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-09-16 13:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-09-15 03:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-09-13 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-09-12 14:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-09-05 15:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-04 13:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-08-25 13:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-08-19 16:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
Show 54 moreShow fewer
- 2026-08-18 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-08-15 01:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-08-09 13:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-08-08 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-08-06 13:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-08-05 19:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-08-04 15:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-08-01 04:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
- 2026-07-30 01:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
- 2026-07-23 14:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
- 2026-07-23 01:04 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-23 00:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-23 00:07 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 21:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 14:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
- 2026-07-21 15:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
- 2026-07-20 17:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
- 2026-07-19 02:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
- 2026-07-18 10:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
- 2026-07-16 16:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
- 2026-07-15 16:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
- 2026-07-15 01:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
- 2026-07-13 22:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
- 2026-07-13 06:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
- 2026-07-11 08:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
- 2026-07-08 15:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
- 2026-07-06 16:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
- 2026-07-06 02:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
- 2026-07-05 02:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
- 2026-07-04 06:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
- 2026-07-02 14:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 47th percentile
- 2026-07-01 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 47th percentile
- 2026-06-30 23:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 47th percentile
- 2026-06-29 14:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 47th percentile
- 2026-06-28 14:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 47th percentile
- 2026-06-28 04:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 47th percentile
- 2026-06-27 03:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 47th percentile
- 2026-06-25 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 47th percentile
- 2026-06-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 47th percentile
- 2026-06-23 21:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 47th percentile
- 2026-06-22 14:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 47th percentile
- 2026-06-21 01:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 47th percentile
- 2026-06-19 19:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 47th percentile
- 2026-06-18 17:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 47th percentile
- 2026-06-17 17:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 47th percentile
- 2026-06-16 17:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 47th percentile
- 2026-06-15 17:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 47th percentile
- 2026-06-14 23:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · 18th percentile
- 2026-06-13 22:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · 18th percentile
- 2026-06-12 23:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · 18th percentile
- 2026-06-11 13:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · 18th percentile
- 2026-06-10 22:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · 18th percentile
- 2026-06-10 13:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · 17th percentile
- 2026-06-08 14:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · 17th percentile
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2010-5153?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2010-5153 published?
Is CVE-2010-5153 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2010-5153?
How do I remediate CVE-2010-5153?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2010-5153
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2010-5153?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.