Heap-based buffer overflow in the string_vformat function in string.c in Exim before 4.70 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via an SMTP session that includes two MAIL commands in conjunction with a large message containing crafted headers, leading to improper rejection logging.
CVE-2010-4344
Score elevated to 9.8 because this CVE is listed on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2022-03-25), indicating real-world exploitation has been confirmed by US federal agencies. NVD baseline CVSS 9.8 retained for reference. Confidence: HIGH.
- Actively exploited in the wild (CISA-KEV)
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 9.8
- EG Score
- 9.8(high)
- EPSS
- 99.4%
- KEV
- ⚠ Exploited
Published
December 14, 2010
Last Modified
April 21, 2026
Advisory Details (7)
Auto-updated Apr 29, 2026Re: [exim-dev] Remote root vulnerability in Exim
http://lists.exim.org/lurker/message/20101210.164935.385e04d0.en.htmlexim - Exim Forgejo
http://git.exim.org/exim.git/commit/24c929a27415c7cfc7126c47e4cad39acf3efa6bPatch Availability(2)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fixed in / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| ubuntu | exim4-daemon-light (4.69-11ubuntu4.1) @ karmic | 2026-07-13 | ubuntu |
| redhat | exim-0:4.63-3.el5_4.1 | 2010-12-10 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
All Vendor Advisories
(2)
Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 144× in last 7d / 619× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 967 total refreshes for this CVE.
- 2026-07-14 06:14 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-14 06:14 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-14 06:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-14 02:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-14 02:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-14 02:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-13 22:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-13 22:52 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-13 22:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-13 22:25 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-13 19:12 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-13 19:12 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-13 19:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-13 17:07 UTCCISA KEV update
- 2026-07-13 15:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-13 15:31 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-13 15:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-13 11:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-13 11:50 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-13 11:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-13 08:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-13 08:09 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-13 08:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-13 06:08 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-13 04:28 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-07-13 04:28 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-13 04:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-13 00:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-13 00:46 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-13 00:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-12 21:04 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-12 21:04 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-12 21:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-12 17:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-12 17:22 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-12 17:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-12 13:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-12 13:42 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-12 13:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-12 10:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-12 10:01 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-12 10:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-12 06:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-12 06:20 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-12 06:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-12 02:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-12 02:39 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-12 02:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-11 22:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-11 22:56 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-11 22:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-11 19:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-11 19:15 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-11 19:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-11 15:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-11 15:34 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-11 15:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-11 11:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-11 11:53 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-11 11:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-11 08:22 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-11 08:12 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-11 08:12 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-11 08:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-11 04:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-11 04:31 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-11 04:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-11 00:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-11 00:50 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-11 00:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-10 21:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-10 21:09 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-10 21:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-10 17:52 UTCCISA KEV update
- 2026-07-10 17:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-10 17:29 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-10 17:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-10 13:48 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-10 13:48 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-10 13:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-10 10:06 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-10 10:06 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-10 10:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-10 06:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-10 06:25 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-10 06:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-10 02:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-10 02:44 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-10 02:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-09 23:03 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-09 23:03 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-09 23:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-09 19:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-09 19:22 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-09 19:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-09 15:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-09 15:42 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-09 15:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-09 12:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-09 12:00 UTCVendor advisory
Publicly available exploits
(3 references)Working exploit code is in the public domain (1 Metasploit module) (2 Exploit-DB entries). Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly — public PoCs typically lead to mass-exploitation within 24-72 hours.
- Exploit-DBEDB-16925✓ verifiedFirst seen Dec 16, 2010
Exim4 < 4.69 - string_format Function Heap Buffer Overflow (Metasploit)
Open source ↗ - Exploit-DBEDB-15725✓ verifiedFirst seen Dec 11, 2010
Exim 4.63 - Remote Command Execution
Open source ↗ - Metasploitexploit/unix/smtp/exim4_string_format✓ verifiedFirst seen Dec 7, 2010
Exim4 string_format Function Heap Buffer Overflow
Open source ↗
Related CVEs(same vendor + same CWE)
Same vendor
10 shownredhat
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-119
Frequently asked(6)
What is CVE-2010-4344?
When was CVE-2010-4344 disclosed?
Is CVE-2010-4344 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2010-4344?
Which products are affected by CVE-2010-4344?
How do I remediate CVE-2010-4344?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2010-4344
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2010-4344?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.