Mozilla Firefox 3.5.x through 3.5.14 and 3.6.x through 3.6.11, Thunderbird 3.1.6 before 3.1.6 and 3.0.x before 3.0.10, and SeaMonkey 2.x before 2.0.10, when JavaScript is enabled, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via vectors related to nsCSSFrameConstructor::ContentAppended, the appendChild method, incorrect index tracking, and the creation of multiple frames, which triggers memory corruption, as exploited in the wild in October 2010 by the Belmoo malware.
CVE-2010-3765
“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.
Score elevated to 9.8 because this CVE is listed on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2025-10-06), indicating real-world exploitation has been confirmed by US federal agencies. NVD baseline CVSS 9.8 retained for reference. Confidence: HIGH.
- Actively exploited in the wild (CISA-KEV) — the reason this is sooner than the SSVC decision on this page at low mission impact
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 9.8
- EG Score
- 9.8CRITICALhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 99EG Risk 99/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity98% × 45%The EG Score, 9.8 of 10.Exploitation100% × 40%Fixed at 100% for a CISA KEV listing: EchelonGraph's rule.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Attend at low mission impact; Act at medium or high.Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it sooner than your standard update timelines at low mission impact and as soon as possible at medium or high. - EPSS PROB
- 83%
- EPSS %ILE
- 99th
- KEV
- ⚠ Exploited
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Attend at low mission impact; Act at medium or high.
A fix is available. Apply it sooner than your standard update timelines at low mission impact and as soon as possible at medium or high.
Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 3 days & forensic triage if it is not.
In CISA KEV yes (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
CISA required action“Apply mitigations per vendor instructions, follow applicable BOD 22-01 guidance for cloud services, or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.”
Quoted verbatim from CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. CISA directs it at US federal civilian executive branch agencies under Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 26-04, which replaced BOD 22-01 on 10 June 2026; it is not EchelonGraph's advice. CISA's notes: https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/security/advisories/mfsa2010-73 · https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-3765
Published
October 28, 2010
Last Modified
April 22, 2026
Advisory Details (5)
Auto-updated Oct 8, 2026Critical vulnerability in Firefox 3.5 and Firefox 3.6 - Mozilla Security Blog
http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2010/10/26/critical-vulnerability-in-firefox-3-5-and-firefox-3-6/Norman Antivirus & Security Suite | Now Even Better
http://norman.com/about_norman/press_center/news_archive/2010/129223/en?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitterVendor Advisories for CVE-2010-3765(2)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Patch Availability(9)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| ubuntu | xulrunner-1.9.2 (1.9.2.12+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.10.1) @ karmic | 2026-10-12 | ubuntu |
| ubuntu | firefox (3.6.12+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.10.1) @ maverick | 2026-10-12 | ubuntu |
| ubuntu | thunderbird (3.1.6+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.10.1) @ maverick | 2026-10-12 | ubuntu |
| redhat | thunderbird-0:3.1.6-1.el6_0 | 2010-11-17 | redhat |
| redhat | xulrunner-0:1.9.2.12-1.el6_0 | 2010-11-10 | redhat |
| redhat | thunderbird-0:2.0.0.24-10.el5_5 | 2010-10-29 | redhat |
| redhat | firefox-0:3.6.11-4.el4_8 | 2010-10-27 | redhat |
| redhat | seamonkey-0:1.0.9-65.el4_8 | 2010-10-27 | redhat |
| redhat | xulrunner-0:1.9.2.11-4.el5_5 | 2010-10-27 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Debian:5.0(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| xulrunner | 1.9.0.10-1 ... 1.9.0.9-1 (25 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Additional Vendor Advisories
(7)
Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.
- Red HatRHSA-2010:0808CRITICAL2010-10-28
RHSA-2010:0808 — Critical
- Red HatRHSA-2010:0809CRITICAL2010-10-28
RHSA-2010:0809 — Critical
- Red HatRHSA-2010:0810CRITICAL2010-10-28
RHSA-2010:0810 — Critical
- Red HatRHSA-2010:0812CRITICAL2010-10-28
RHSA-2010:0812 — Critical
- UbuntuUSN-1011-1HIGH
Firefox vulnerability
- UbuntuUSN-1011-2HIGH
Thunderbird vulnerability
- UbuntuUSN-1011-3HIGH
Xulrunner vulnerability
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 101× in last 7d / 430× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 1,911 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 1,811 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-12 06:23 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-12 06:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cmrc-q43h-xrrq · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-12 02:40 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-12 02:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cmrc-q43h-xrrq · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-11 23:00 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 23:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cmrc-q43h-xrrq · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-11 19:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 19:20 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 19:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cmrc-q43h-xrrq · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-11 15:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 15:40 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 15:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cmrc-q43h-xrrq · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-11 12:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 12:01 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 12:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cmrc-q43h-xrrq · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-11 08:21 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 08:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cmrc-q43h-xrrq · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-11 04:41 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 04:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cmrc-q43h-xrrq · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-11 01:00 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 00:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cmrc-q43h-xrrq · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-10 21:18 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 21:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cmrc-q43h-xrrq · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-10 17:36 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 17:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cmrc-q43h-xrrq · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-10 13:56 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 13:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cmrc-q43h-xrrq · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-10 10:16 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 10:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cmrc-q43h-xrrq · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-10 06:36 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 06:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cmrc-q43h-xrrq · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-10 02:56 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 02:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cmrc-q43h-xrrq · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-09 23:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-09 23:16 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 23:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cmrc-q43h-xrrq · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-09 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 83% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-09 19:35 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 19:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cmrc-q43h-xrrq · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-09 15:55 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 15:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cmrc-q43h-xrrq · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-09 12:15 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 12:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cmrc-q43h-xrrq · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-09 08:33 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 08:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cmrc-q43h-xrrq · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-09 04:52 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 04:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cmrc-q43h-xrrq · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-09 01:12 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 01:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cmrc-q43h-xrrq · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-08 21:33 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-08 21:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cmrc-q43h-xrrq · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-08 17:52 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-08 17:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cmrc-q43h-xrrq · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-08 14:12 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-08 14:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cmrc-q43h-xrrq · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-08 10:28 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-08 10:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cmrc-q43h-xrrq · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-08 06:48 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-08 06:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cmrc-q43h-xrrq · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-08 03:08 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-08 03:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cmrc-q43h-xrrq · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-07 23:28 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 23:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cmrc-q43h-xrrq · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-07 19:49 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 19:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cmrc-q43h-xrrq · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-07 16:09 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 16:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cmrc-q43h-xrrq · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-07 12:28 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 12:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cmrc-q43h-xrrq · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-07 08:49 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 08:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cmrc-q43h-xrrq · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-07 05:09 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 05:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cmrc-q43h-xrrq · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-07 01:29 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 01:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cmrc-q43h-xrrq · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-06 21:49 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 21:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cmrc-q43h-xrrq · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-06 18:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-06 18:09 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 18:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cmrc-q43h-xrrq · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-06 15:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 83% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-06 14:30 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 14:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cmrc-q43h-xrrq · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-06 10:50 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 10:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cmrc-q43h-xrrq · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-06 07:11 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 07:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cmrc-q43h-xrrq · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-06 03:31 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 03:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cmrc-q43h-xrrq · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-06 03:31 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 03:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cmrc-q43h-xrrq · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-05 23:51 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 23:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cmrc-q43h-xrrq · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-05 20:11 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 20:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cmrc-q43h-xrrq · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-05 16:30 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 16:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cmrc-q43h-xrrq · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-05 12:51 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 12:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cmrc-q43h-xrrq · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-05 09:11 UTCVendor advisory
Publicly available exploits
(5 references)Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 Metasploit module, 4 Exploit-DB entries). Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.
- Exploit-DBEDB-16509✓ verifiedPublished Feb 22, 2011
Mozilla Firefox - Interleaving 'document.write' / 'appendChild' (Metasploit)
Open source ↗ - Metasploitexploit/windows/browser/mozilla_interleaved_write✓ verifiedPublished Feb 18, 2011
Mozilla Firefox Interleaved document.write/appendChild Memory Corruption
Open source ↗ - Exploit-DBEDB-15352✓ verifiedPublished Oct 29, 2010
Mozilla Firefox 3.6.8 < 3.6.11 - Interleaving 'document.write' / 'appendChild' Remote Overflow
Open source ↗ - Exploit-DBEDB-15341✓ verifiedPublished Oct 28, 2010
Mozilla Firefox - Interleaving 'document.write' / 'appendChild' Denial of Service
Open source ↗ - Exploit-DBEDB-15342✓ verifiedPublished Oct 28, 2010
Mozilla Firefox - Simplified Memory Corruption (PoC)
Open source ↗
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownDebian:5.0:xulrunner
- CVE-2012-0444EG 10.0EPSS p95HIGH
- CVE-2011-2998EG 10.0EPSS p92HIGH
- CVE-2011-2995EG 10.0EPSS p91HIGH
- CVE-2011-2984EG 10.0HIGH
- CVE-2011-2982EG 10.0EPSS p92HIGH
- CVE-2011-2378EG 10.0EPSS p93HIGH
- CVE-2011-0084EG 10.0EPSS p92HIGH
- CVE-2011-2376EG 10.0EPSS p91HIGH
- CVE-2011-2374EG 10.0EPSS p93HIGH
- CVE-2011-2371EG 10.0EPSS p100HIGH
Same vendor
8 shownredhat:RHSA-2010:0861
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-119
- CVE-2010-2891EG 7.5EPSS p96HIGH
- CVE-2010-3227EG 9.3EPSS p97HIGH
- CVE-2010-3653EG 9.3EPSS p99HIGH
- CVE-2010-3036EG 10.0EPSS p93HIGH
- CVE-2010-3654EG 9.3EPSS p99HIGH
- CVE-2010-3655EG 9.3EPSS p95HIGH
- CVE-2010-4084EG 9.3EPSS p91HIGH
- CVE-2010-4085EG 9.3EPSS p91HIGH
- CVE-2010-4086EG 9.3HIGH
- CVE-2010-4087EG 9.3EPSS p91HIGH
Frequently asked(6)
What is CVE-2010-3765?
When was CVE-2010-3765 made public?
Is CVE-2010-3765 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2010-3765?
Which products are affected by CVE-2010-3765?
How do I remediate CVE-2010-3765?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2010-3765
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2010-3765?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.