The WDB target agent debug service in Wind River VxWorks 6.x, 5.x, and earlier, as used on the Rockwell Automation 1756-ENBT series A with firmware 3.2.6 and 3.6.1 and other products, allows remote attackers to read or modify arbitrary memory locations, perform function calls, or manage tasks via requests to UDP port 17185, a related issue to CVE-2005-3804.
CVE-2010-2965
“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.
Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2022-05-17. NVD baseline CVSS 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.
Also known asEUVD-2010-2969 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-4hhv-jc45-cmpc (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- High exploitation likelihood — EPSS 58%
No fix has been recorded since the CVE record was published in 2010 — use a compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and check the vendor's advisory.
- CVSS v3
- 9.8
- EG Score
- 9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 82EG Risk 82/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity98% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation58% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: No fix has been recorded since the CVE record was published in 2010. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and check the vendor's advisory for a fix. - EPSS PROB
- 58%
- EPSS %ILE
- 99th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 58% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-25). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
No fix has been recorded since the CVE record was published in 2010. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and check the vendor's advisory for a fix.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
August 5, 2010
Last Modified
May 28, 2026
Advisory Details (5)
Auto-updated Oct 8, 2026VU#362332 - Wind River Systems VxWorks debug service enabled by default
http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/362332Full Disclosure: SEC Consult SA-20250127-0 :: Weak Password Hashing Algorithms in Wind River Software VxWorks RTOS
http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2025/Jan/10VU#362332 - Wind River Systems VxWorks debug service enabled by default
http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/MAPG-86FPQLVU#362332 - Wind River Systems VxWorks debug service enabled by default
http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/MAPG-86EPFAVendor Advisories for CVE-2010-2965(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 23× in last 7d / 52× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 96 of 142 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 4 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 46 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-25 20:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4hhv-jc45-cmpc · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-25 20:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 58% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-24 21:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 21:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4hhv-jc45-cmpc · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-24 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 58% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-23 23:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-23 23:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4hhv-jc45-cmpc · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-23 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 47% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-23 00:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-23 00:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4hhv-jc45-cmpc · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-22 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 47% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-22 01:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-22 01:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4hhv-jc45-cmpc · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-21 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 47% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-21 02:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-21 02:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4hhv-jc45-cmpc · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-20 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 47% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-20 03:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-20 03:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4hhv-jc45-cmpc · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-19 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 47% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-19 03:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-19 03:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4hhv-jc45-cmpc · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-18 05:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-18 05:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4hhv-jc45-cmpc · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
Show 71 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-17 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 47% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-17 05:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 05:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4hhv-jc45-cmpc · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-16 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 47% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-16 06:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-16 06:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4hhv-jc45-cmpc · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-15 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 47% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-15 05:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-15 05:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4hhv-jc45-cmpc · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-14 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 47% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-14 01:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-14 01:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4hhv-jc45-cmpc · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-13 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 47% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-12 21:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 21:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4hhv-jc45-cmpc · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-12 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 47% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-12 01:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-10 19:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 47% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 47% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-08 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 47% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 47% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 47% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 47% · 98th percentile
- 2026-09-30 14:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 47% · 98th percentile
- 2026-09-29 08:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 13:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 58% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 58% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-24 13:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 58% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-20 20:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 58% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-16 13:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 58% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-15 03:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 58% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-13 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 58% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-12 14:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 58% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-10 09:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 58% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 58% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-05 15:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 58% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-04 13:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 58% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-28 21:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 58% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-26 14:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 58% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-25 13:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 58% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-19 16:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 58% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-18 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 58% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-16 02:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 58% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-15 01:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 58% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-07 16:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 58% · 98th percentile
- 2026-08-06 13:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 58% · 98th percentile
- 2026-08-05 19:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 58% · 98th percentile
- 2026-08-01 04:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 58% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-30 01:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 58% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-25 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 58% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-23 14:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 58% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-23 01:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-23 00:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-23 00:06 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 21:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 14:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 58% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-20 17:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 58% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-19 02:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 58% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-18 10:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 58% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-16 16:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 58% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-15 16:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 58% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-13 22:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 58% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-13 06:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 58% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-11 08:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 58% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-08 15:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 58% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-06 02:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 58% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-05 02:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 58% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-02 14:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 58% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-01 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 58% · 98th percentile
- 2026-06-30 23:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 58% · 98th percentile
- 2026-06-29 14:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 58% · 98th percentile
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2010-2965?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2010-2965 published?
Is CVE-2010-2965 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2010-2965?
How do I remediate CVE-2010-2965?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2010-2965
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2010-2965?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.