MIT Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) 1.7.x and 1.8.x through 1.8.3 does not properly determine the acceptability of checksums, which might allow remote attackers to forge GSS tokens, gain privileges, or have unspecified other impact via (1) an unkeyed checksum, (2) an unkeyed PAC checksum, or (3) a KrbFastArmoredReq checksum based on an RC4 key.
CVE-2010-1324
“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.
Score 3.7 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2022-05-02. NVD baseline CVSS 3.7; sources differ by 0.0.
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 3.7
- EG Score
- 3.7LOWmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 18EG Risk 18/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity37% × 45%The EG Score, 3.7 of 10.Exploitation2.2% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 2.3%
- EPSS %ILE
- 82nd
- KEV
- Not listed
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
December 2, 2010
Last Modified
April 29, 2026
References (27)
- MITRE · CVE Programhttp://kb.vmware.com/kb/1035108
- MITRE · CVE Programhttp://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2011/Mar/msg00006.html
- MITRE · CVE Programhttp://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-December/051976.html
- MITRE · CVE Programhttp://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-December/051999.html
- MITRE · CVE Programhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-12/msg00000.html
- MITRE · CVE Programhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-12/msg00006.html
- MITRE · CVE Programhttp://lists.vmware.com/pipermail/security-announce/2011/000133.html
- MITRE · CVE Programhttp://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=129562442714657&w=2
- MITRE · CVE Programhttp://osvdb.org/69609 (archived copy: the site no longer serves it)
- MITRE · CVE Programhttp://secunia.com/advisories/42399 (archived copy: the site no longer serves it)Third-party advisory (tagged Vendor Advisory by NVD)
- MITRE · CVE Programhttp://secunia.com/advisories/43015 (archived copy: the site no longer serves it)
- MITRE · CVE Programhttp://support.apple.com/kb/HT4581
- MITRE · CVE Programhttp://web.mit.edu/kerberos/advisories/MITKRB5-SA-2010-007.txtVendor Advisory
- MITRE · CVE Programhttp://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2010:246
- MITRE · CVE Programhttp://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/cpujul2015-2367936.htmlPatch · Vendor Advisory
15 of 27 shown · show the other 12
- MITRE · CVE Programhttp://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2010-0925.html
- MITRE · CVE Programhttp://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/514953/100/0/threaded (archived copy: the site no longer serves it)
- MITRE · CVE Programhttp://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/517739/100/0/threaded (archived copy: the site no longer serves it)
- MITRE · CVE Programhttp://www.securityfocus.com/bid/45116 (archived copy: the site no longer serves it)
- MITRE · CVE Programhttp://www.securitytracker.com/id?1024803
- MITRE · CVE Programhttp://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-1030-1
- MITRE · CVE Programhttp://www.vmware.com/security/advisories/VMSA-2011-0007.html
- MITRE · CVE Programhttp://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/3094
- MITRE · CVE Programhttp://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/3095
- MITRE · CVE Programhttp://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/3118
- MITRE · CVE Programhttp://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0187
- MITRE · CVE Programhttps://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A11936
Patch Availability(2)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| ubuntu | libkrb5-3 (1.8.1+dfsg-5ubuntu0.2) @ maverick | 2026-05-29 | ubuntu |
| redhat | krb5-0:1.8.2-3.el6_0.3 | 2010-11-30 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| krb5 | — |
| — |
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| krb5 | — |
| — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| krb5 | — |
| — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| krb5 | — |
| — |
All Vendor Advisories
(2)
Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 21× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 85 of 128 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 15 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 43 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-12 01:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 82nd percentile
- 2026-10-10 19:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 82nd percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 82nd percentile
- 2026-10-08 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 82nd percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 82nd percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 82nd percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 82nd percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 82nd percentile
- 2026-10-01 14:40 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-30 14:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 82nd percentile
- 2026-09-29 08:04 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 13:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 82nd percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 82nd percentile
- 2026-09-24 13:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 82nd percentile
- 2026-09-20 20:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 82nd percentile
- 2026-09-16 13:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 82nd percentile
- 2026-09-15 03:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 81st percentile
- 2026-09-13 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 81st percentile
- 2026-09-12 14:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 81st percentile
- 2026-09-12 12:10 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-10 09:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 81st percentile
- 2026-09-07 15:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 81st percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 81st percentile
- 2026-09-05 15:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.6% · 84th percentile
Show 60 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-04 13:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 81st percentile
- 2026-08-28 21:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.6% · 84th percentile
- 2026-08-26 14:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 81st percentile
- 2026-08-25 13:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 81st percentile
- 2026-08-24 17:03 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-19 16:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 81st percentile
- 2026-08-18 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 81st percentile
- 2026-08-16 02:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 81st percentile
- 2026-08-15 01:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 81st percentile
- 2026-08-09 13:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 81st percentile
- 2026-08-08 10:49 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-07 16:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 81st percentile
- 2026-08-06 13:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 81st percentile
- 2026-08-05 19:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 81st percentile
- 2026-08-04 15:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 81st percentile
- 2026-08-01 04:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 81st percentile
- 2026-07-30 01:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 81st percentile
- 2026-07-25 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 81st percentile
- 2026-07-23 14:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 81st percentile
- 2026-07-23 03:42 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-07-23 01:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-23 00:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-23 00:05 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 21:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 14:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 81st percentile
- 2026-07-21 15:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 81st percentile
- 2026-07-20 17:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 80th percentile
- 2026-07-19 02:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 80th percentile
- 2026-07-18 10:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 80th percentile
- 2026-07-16 16:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 80th percentile
- 2026-07-15 16:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 80th percentile
- 2026-07-15 01:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 80th percentile
- 2026-07-13 22:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 80th percentile
- 2026-07-13 06:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 80th percentile
- 2026-07-11 08:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 80th percentile
- 2026-07-08 15:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 80th percentile
- 2026-07-06 02:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 80th percentile
- 2026-07-05 22:29 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-07-05 02:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 80th percentile
- 2026-07-02 14:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 80th percentile
- 2026-07-01 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 80th percentile
- 2026-06-30 23:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 80th percentile
- 2026-06-29 14:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 80th percentile
- 2026-06-28 14:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 80th percentile
- 2026-06-28 04:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 80th percentile
- 2026-06-27 03:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 80th percentile
- 2026-06-25 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 80th percentile
- 2026-06-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 80th percentile
- 2026-06-23 21:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 80th percentile
- 2026-06-21 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 80th percentile
- 2026-06-21 01:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 80th percentile
- 2026-06-19 19:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 80th percentile
- 2026-06-18 17:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 80th percentile
- 2026-06-17 17:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 80th percentile
- 2026-06-17 09:43 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-06-16 17:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 80th percentile
- 2026-06-15 17:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 80th percentile
- 2026-06-14 23:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.5% · 87th percentile
- 2026-06-13 22:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.5% · 87th percentile
- 2026-06-12 23:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.5% · 87th percentile
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor)
Same product
10 shownDebian:11:krb5
- CVE-2011-4862EG 10.0EPSS p100HIGH
- CVE-2011-0285EG 10.0EPSS p97HIGH
- CVE-2009-4212EG 10.0EPSS p94HIGH
- CVE-2009-0846EG 10.0EPSS p95HIGH
- CVE-2008-0947EG 10.0EPSS p95HIGH
- CVE-2007-5902EG 10.0EPSS p93HIGH
- CVE-2007-4743EG 10.0EPSS p91HIGH
- CVE-2007-3999EG 10.0EPSS p96HIGH
- CVE-2007-2442EG 10.0EPSS p96HIGH
- CVE-2007-0956EG 10.0EPSS p98HIGH
Same vendor
3 shownredhat:RHSA-2010:0925 · ubuntu:USN-1030-1
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2010-1324?
When was CVE-2010-1324 made public?
Is CVE-2010-1324 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2010-1324?
How do I remediate CVE-2010-1324?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2010-1324
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2010-1324?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.