Directory traversal vulnerability in the ccNewsletter (com_ccnewsletter) component 1.0.5 for Joomla! allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via a .. (dot dot) in the controller parameter in a ccnewsletter action to index.php.
CVE-2010-0467
“▲” beside the score: it is higher than NVD's CVSS score.
Score elevated to 6.6 because EPSS predicted 43% probability of exploitation within the next 30 days (98th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs) when EchelonGraph scored this CVE. NVD baseline CVSS 5.8 retained for reference. Confidence: see factors.
- Public exploit code is available (Exploit-DB, marked verified by Exploit-DB)
No fix has been recorded since the CVE record was published in 2010 — use a compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and check the vendor's advisory.
- CVSS v3
- 5.8
- EG Score
- 6.6MEDIUMhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 56EG Risk 56/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity66% × 45%The EG Score, 6.6 of 10.Exploitation65% × 40%EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 2 (Weaponized): a constant, not a probability.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.Exploitation public PoC (exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: No fix has been recorded since the CVE record was published in 2010. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and check the vendor's advisory for a fix. - EPSS PROB
- 43%
- EPSS %ILE
- 98th
- KEV
- Not listed
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
No fix has been recorded since the CVE record was published in 2010. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and check the vendor's advisory for a fix.
Exploitation public PoC (exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
February 2, 2010
Last Modified
April 29, 2026
References (6)
- MITRE · CVE Programhttp://secunia.com/advisories/38378 (archived copy: the site no longer serves it)Broken Link · Third Party Advisory
- MITRE · CVE Programhttp://www.chillcreations.com/en/blog/ccnewsletter-joomla-newsletter/ccnewsletter-106-security-release.htmlBroken Link · Vendor Advisory
- MITRE · CVE Programhttp://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/11277Third Party Advisory · VDB Entry
- MITRE · CVE Programhttp://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/11282Third Party Advisory · VDB Entry
- MITRE · CVE Programhttp://www.securityfocus.com/bid/37987 (archived copy: the site no longer serves it)Broken Link · Exploit · Third Party Advisory · VDB Entry
- MITRE · CVE Programhttps://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/55953Third Party Advisory · VDB Entry
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 16× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 80 of 104 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 20 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 24 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-12 01:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 43% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-10 19:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 43% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 43% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-08 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 43% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 43% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 43% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 43% · 98th percentile
- 2026-09-30 14:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 43% · 98th percentile
- 2026-09-29 08:03 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 13:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 43% · 98th percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 43% · 98th percentile
- 2026-09-24 13:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 43% · 98th percentile
- 2026-09-16 13:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 43% · 98th percentile
- 2026-09-13 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 43% · 98th percentile
- 2026-09-12 14:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 43% · 98th percentile
- 2026-09-10 09:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 43% · 98th percentile
- 2026-09-07 15:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 43% · 98th percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 43% · 98th percentile
- 2026-09-05 15:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 43% · 98th percentile
- 2026-09-04 13:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 43% · 98th percentile
- 2026-08-28 21:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 43% · 98th percentile
- 2026-08-26 14:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 43% · 98th percentile
- 2026-08-25 13:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 43% · 98th percentile
- 2026-08-19 16:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 43% · 98th percentile
Show 55 moreShow fewer
- 2026-08-18 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 43% · 98th percentile
- 2026-08-16 02:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 43% · 98th percentile
- 2026-08-15 01:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 43% · 98th percentile
- 2026-08-09 13:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 43% · 98th percentile
- 2026-08-07 16:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 43% · 98th percentile
- 2026-08-06 13:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 43% · 98th percentile
- 2026-08-01 04:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 43% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-30 01:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 43% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-25 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 43% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-23 01:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-23 00:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-23 00:05 UTCEG score recompute▲ 0.80
- 2026-07-22 21:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 14:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 43% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-21 15:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 43% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-20 17:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 43% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-19 02:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 43% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-18 10:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 43% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-16 16:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 43% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-15 16:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 43% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-13 22:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 43% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-13 06:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 43% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-11 08:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 43% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-05 02:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 43% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-02 14:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 43% · 98th percentile
- 2026-07-01 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 43% · 98th percentile
- 2026-06-30 23:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 43% · 98th percentile
- 2026-06-29 14:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 43% · 98th percentile
- 2026-06-28 14:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 43% · 98th percentile
- 2026-06-28 04:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 43% · 98th percentile
- 2026-06-27 03:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 43% · 98th percentile
- 2026-06-25 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 43% · 98th percentile
- 2026-06-23 21:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 43% · 98th percentile
- 2026-06-22 14:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 43% · 98th percentile
- 2026-06-21 01:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 43% · 98th percentile
- 2026-06-18 17:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 43% · 98th percentile
- 2026-06-17 17:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 43% · 98th percentile
- 2026-06-16 17:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 43% · 98th percentile
- 2026-06-15 17:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 43% · 98th percentile
- 2026-06-14 23:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 87th percentile
- 2026-06-13 22:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 87th percentile
- 2026-06-12 23:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 87th percentile
- 2026-06-11 13:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 87th percentile
- 2026-06-10 22:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 87th percentile
- 2026-06-10 13:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 87th percentile
- 2026-06-08 14:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 87th percentile
- 2026-06-07 15:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 87th percentile
- 2026-06-06 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 87th percentile
- 2026-06-05 22:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 87th percentile
- 2026-06-05 06:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 87th percentile
- 2026-06-04 13:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 87th percentile
- 2026-06-02 20:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 87th percentile
- 2026-06-01 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 87th percentile
- 2026-05-31 22:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 87th percentile
- 2026-05-31 00:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 87th percentile
Publicly available exploits
(3 references)Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (2 Exploit-DB entries), as is 1 Nuclei detection template. A detection template checks whether a system is affected; it is not necessarily exploit code. No fix has been recorded since the CVE record was published in 2010. If the vendor still supports the product, apply the fixed version it names; if it no longer does, isolate the affected system.
- Exploit-DBEDB-11277✓ verifiedPublished Jan 28, 2010
Joomla! Component CCNewsLetter - Directory Traversal
Open source ↗ - Exploit-DBEDB-11282✓ verifiedPublished Jan 28, 2010
Joomla! Component CCNewsLetter - Local File Inclusion
Open source ↗ - Nucleihttp/cves/2010/CVE-2010-0467.yamlPublished Sep 29, 2021
Joomla! Component CCNewsLetter - Local File Inclusion
Open source ↗
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2010-0467?
When was CVE-2010-0467 made public?
Is CVE-2010-0467 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2010-0467?
How do I remediate CVE-2010-0467?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2010-0467
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2010-0467?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.