CVE-2010-0361

HIGHCVSS v2 · 10.010.0
EchelonGraph scoreLOW confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS v2 base score.

This CVE was only ever scored under CVSS v2.0. NVD CVSS v2.0 base 10.0 — NVD rates that HIGH (NVD's v2 bands: LOW 0.0–3.9 / MEDIUM 4.0–6.9 / HIGH 7.0–10.0; no CRITICAL band). Vector AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C. CVSS v2 is an older, coarser metric than v3.1/v4.0 (no Scope, no User Interaction, no Attack Requirements), so it is not directly comparable to a v3 or v4 score. NVD has never re-scored this record under v3. EPSS predicts 80% exploitation probability in the next 30 days; it does not lift the v2 base. EPSS sets EG Risk's exploitation input. Confidence: LOW.

Triggered by: NVD CVSS v2.0 (legacy fallback)
Sources: NVD CVSS v2.0
Weaponized
10.0EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan mitigationRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High exploitation likelihood — EPSS 80%
  • Public exploit code is available (Metasploit, Exploit-DB, marked verified by Exploit-DB, other public proof-of-concept code)
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 80%CVSS v2: 10.0Exploit: Metasploit · Exploit-DB (verified) · other public PoCExposed services: Not assessed

No fix has been recorded since the CVE record was published in 2010 — if the vendor still supports the product, apply the fixed version it names; if not, isolate the affected system (restrict network access to it, for example with a firewall, or keep it off the internet) or retire the product.

Stack-based buffer overflow in the WebDAV implementation in webservd in Sun Java System Web Server (aka SJWS) 7.0 Update 7 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) and possibly have unspecified other impact via a long URI in an HTTP OPTIONS request.

CVSS v2.0 (legacy)
10.0HIGHNVD never assigned a CVSS v3 rating to this CVE
EG Score
10.0HIGHlow confidence
EG Risk
77
EG Risk 77/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity100% × 45%
The EG Score, 10.0 of 10.
Exploitation80% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
Exploitation public PoC (exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: No fix has been recorded since the CVE record was published in 2010. If the vendor still supports the product, apply the fixed version it names within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high; if it no longer does, isolate the affected system (restrict network access to it, for example with a firewall, or keep it off the internet) or retire the product.
EPSS PROB
80%
EPSS %ILE
99th
KEV
Not listed

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.

No fix has been recorded since the CVE record was published in 2010. If the vendor still supports the product, apply the fixed version it names within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high; if it no longer does, isolate the affected system (restrict network access to it, for example with a firewall, or keep it off the internet) or retire the product.

Exploitation public PoC (exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

January 20, 2010

Last Modified

April 23, 2026

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 4× in last 7d / 13× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 24 repeat rows among the latest 89 are merged into the row they repeat.

  1. 2026-10-12 01:50 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-11 13:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
  3. 2026-10-07 23:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
  4. 2026-10-06 15:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
  5. 2026-10-04 23:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
  6. 2026-09-30 14:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
  7. 2026-09-29 08:03 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-09-26 15:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
  9. 2026-09-24 13:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
  10. 2026-09-20 20:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
  11. 2026-09-16 13:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
  12. 2026-09-13 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
  13. 2026-09-12 14:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
  14. 2026-09-10 09:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
  15. 2026-09-06 13:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
  16. 2026-09-05 15:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
  17. 2026-08-28 21:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
  18. 2026-08-26 14:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
  19. 2026-08-19 16:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
  20. 2026-08-16 02:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
  21. 2026-08-15 01:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
  22. 2026-08-06 13:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
  23. 2026-08-05 19:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
  24. 2026-08-04 15:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
  25. 2026-07-26 13:40 UTCEG score recomputeAssessed again: 10.0 HIGH
Show 40 more
  1. 2026-07-23 01:00 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-07-23 00:38 UTCEG score recompute▼ 8.30
  3. 2026-07-23 00:05 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 8.3 HIGH
  4. 2026-07-22 21:44 UTCEG score recompute▼ 9.00
  5. 2026-07-22 14:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
  6. 2026-07-21 15:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
  7. 2026-07-20 17:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
  8. 2026-07-15 16:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
  9. 2026-07-11 08:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
  10. 2026-07-06 02:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
  11. 2026-07-02 14:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
  12. 2026-07-01 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
  13. 2026-06-27 03:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
  14. 2026-06-25 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
  15. 2026-06-23 21:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
  16. 2026-06-21 01:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
  17. 2026-06-17 17:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
  18. 2026-06-16 17:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
  19. 2026-06-15 17:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
  20. 2026-06-13 22:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 89% · 99th percentile
  21. 2026-06-12 23:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 89% · 99th percentile
  22. 2026-06-10 22:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 89% · 99th percentile
  23. 2026-06-10 13:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 89% · 99th percentile
  24. 2026-06-07 15:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 89% · 99th percentile
  25. 2026-06-06 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 88% · 99th percentile
  26. 2026-06-05 22:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 88% · 99th percentile
  27. 2026-06-05 06:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 88% · 99th percentile
  28. 2026-06-04 13:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 88% · 99th percentile
  29. 2026-06-02 20:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 88% · 99th percentile
  30. 2026-06-01 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 88% · 99th percentile
  31. 2026-05-31 00:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 88% · 99th percentile
  32. 2026-05-29 13:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 88% · 99th percentile
  33. 2026-05-29 13:00 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-05-29 13:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6f2j-xq53-97gq · GitHub severity HIGH
  35. 2026-05-28 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 88% · 99th percentile
  36. 2026-05-26 13:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 88% · 99th percentile
  37. 2026-05-24 16:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 88% · 99th percentile
  38. 2026-05-22 21:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 88% · 99th percentile
  39. 2026-05-20 22:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 88% · 99th percentile
  40. 2026-05-18 21:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 88% · 99th percentile

Publicly available exploits

(4 references)

Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 Metasploit module, 3 Exploit-DB entries). No fix has been recorded since the CVE record was published in 2010. If the vendor still supports the product, apply the fixed version it names; if it no longer does, isolate the affected system or retire the product.

  • Exploit-DBEDB-16314✓ verified
    Published Aug 7, 2010

    Sun Java Web Server - System WebDAV OPTIONS Buffer Overflow (Metasploit)

    Open source ↗
  • Metasploitexploit/multi/http/sun_jsws_dav_options✓ verified
    Published May 2, 2010

    Sun Java System Web Server WebDAV OPTIONS Buffer Overflow

    Open source ↗
  • Exploit-DBEDB-14287
    Published Jul 9, 2010

    Sun Java Web Server 7.0 u7 - Remote Overflow (DEP Bypass)

    Open source ↗
  • Exploit-DBEDB-14194
    Published Jul 3, 2010

    Sun Java Web Server 7.0 u7 - Remote Overflow

    Open source ↗

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2010-0361?
CVE-2010-0361 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on January 20, 2010. Stack-based buffer overflow in the WebDAV implementation in webservd in Sun Java System Web Server (aka SJWS) 7.0 Update 7 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) and possibly have unspecified other impact via a long URI in an HTTP OPTIONS request.
When was the CVE record for CVE-2010-0361 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2010-0361 was published on January 20, 2010. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of April 23, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2010-0361 actively exploited?
CVE-2010-0361 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. EchelonGraph's EG-KEV model places it in Tier 2 (Weaponized), which is not evidence of exploitation: a Metasploit module exists for it, and Exploit-DB marks a public exploit for it as verified. EchelonGraph does not test whether exploit code works. FIRST EPSS estimates a 80% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (99th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
How do I remediate CVE-2010-0361?
No fix for CVE-2010-0361 has been recorded since its CVE record was published in 2010. If the vendor still supports the product, apply the fixed version it names; if it no longer does, isolate the affected system (restrict network access to it, for example with a firewall, or keep it off the internet) or retire the product.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2010-0361

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2010-0361?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.