The kernel in Microsoft Windows NT 3.1 through Windows 7, including Windows 2000 SP4, Windows XP SP2 and SP3, Windows Server 2003 SP2, Windows Vista Gold, SP1, and SP2, and Windows Server 2008 Gold and SP2, when access to 16-bit applications is enabled on a 32-bit x86 platform, does not properly validate certain BIOS calls, which allows local users to gain privileges by crafting a VDM_TIB data structure in the Thread Environment Block (TEB), and then calling the NtVdmControl function to start the Windows Virtual DOS Machine (aka NTVDM) subsystem, leading to improperly handled exceptions involving the #GP trap handler (nt!KiTrap0D), aka "Windows Kernel Exception Handler Vulnerability."
CVE-2010-0232
“▲” beside the score: it is higher than NVD's CVSS score.
Score elevated to 9.0 because this CVE is listed on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2022-03-03), indicating real-world exploitation has been confirmed by US federal agencies. NVD baseline CVSS 7.8 retained for reference. The 9.0 is the floor for confirmed exploitation, not an impact rating: this CVE's impact severity (EG Severity) is CVSS 7.8 HIGH under GitHub Security Advisory CVSS. Confidence: HIGH.
Also known asEUVD-2010-0263 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-xprh-x7hf-54qr (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- Actively exploited in the wild (CISA-KEV) — the reason this is sooner than the SSVC decision on this page at low or medium mission impact
A fix is referenced (a reference tagged "Patch", often a source commit), but no release containing it is confirmed — find the release that contains it; until it is applied, mitigate (WAF / firewall / segmentation).
- CVSS v3
- 7.8
- EG Score
- 9.0CRITICALhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 75EG Risk 75/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity78% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation100% × 40%Fixed at 100% for a CISA KEV listing: EchelonGraph's rule.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Attend at medium and Act at high mission impact.Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is referenced, but no release containing it is confirmed. Check the referenced fix and the vendor's advisory for a release that contains it and apply that within your standard update timelines at low, sooner than that at medium and as soon as possible at high mission impact; until then, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation. - EPSS PROB
- 29%
- EPSS %ILE
- 98th
- KEV
- ⚠ Exploited
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (9.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.0 is the CISA KEV floor for confirmed exploitation, not an impact rating: its impact severity (EG Severity) is CVSS 7.8 HIGH.
- EG Severity
- 7.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 29% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-25). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- CISA KEV and EG-KEV Tier 1 (exploited in the wild)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Attend at medium mission impactTrack at low, Attend at medium and Act at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 14 days if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Attend at medium and Act at high mission impact.
A fix is referenced, but no release containing it is confirmed. Check the referenced fix and the vendor's advisory for a release that contains it and apply that within your standard update timelines at low, sooner than that at medium and as soon as possible at high mission impact; until then, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation.
Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 14 days if it is not.
In CISA KEV yes (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
CISA required action“Apply updates per vendor instructions.”
Quoted verbatim from CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. CISA directs it at US federal civilian executive branch agencies under Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 26-04, which replaced BOD 22-01 on 10 June 2026; it is not EchelonGraph's advice. CISA's notes: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-0232
Published
January 21, 2010
Last Modified
April 22, 2026
Advisory Details (6)
Auto-updated Oct 19, 2026CVE-2010-0232: Microsoft Windows Kernel Exception Handler
http://lists.immunitysec.com/pipermail/dailydave/2010-January/006000.htmlFull Disclosure: Microsoft Windows NT #GP Trap Handler Allows Users to Switch Kernel Stack
http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2010/Jan/341Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 20× in last 7d / 172× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 1,134 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 1,034 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-25 20:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 29% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-25 07:12 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 07:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xprh-x7hf-54qr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-24 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 29% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-24 05:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 05:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xprh-x7hf-54qr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-23 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 29% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-23 03:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-23 03:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xprh-x7hf-54qr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-22 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 29% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-22 01:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-22 01:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xprh-x7hf-54qr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-21 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 29% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-20 23:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-20 23:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xprh-x7hf-54qr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-20 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 29% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-19 21:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-19 21:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xprh-x7hf-54qr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-19 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 29% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-18 20:04 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-18 20:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xprh-x7hf-54qr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-18 11:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 18:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 18:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xprh-x7hf-54qr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-17 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 29% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-16 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 29% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-16 16:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-16 16:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xprh-x7hf-54qr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-15 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 29% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-15 14:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-15 14:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xprh-x7hf-54qr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-14 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 29% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-14 12:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-14 12:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xprh-x7hf-54qr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-13 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 29% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-13 10:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xprh-x7hf-54qr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-12 21:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 29% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-12 08:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xprh-x7hf-54qr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-12 04:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xprh-x7hf-54qr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-12 01:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xprh-x7hf-54qr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-11 21:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 21:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xprh-x7hf-54qr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-11 17:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 17:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xprh-x7hf-54qr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-11 13:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xprh-x7hf-54qr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-11 13:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 29% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-11 09:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xprh-x7hf-54qr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-11 06:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xprh-x7hf-54qr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-11 02:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xprh-x7hf-54qr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-10 22:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-10 22:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xprh-x7hf-54qr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-10 19:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 29% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-10 18:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xprh-x7hf-54qr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-10 15:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xprh-x7hf-54qr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-10 11:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xprh-x7hf-54qr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-10 07:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xprh-x7hf-54qr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-10 03:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xprh-x7hf-54qr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-09 23:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xprh-x7hf-54qr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-09 20:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-09 20:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xprh-x7hf-54qr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-09 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 29% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-09 16:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xprh-x7hf-54qr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-09 12:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xprh-x7hf-54qr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-09 08:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xprh-x7hf-54qr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-09 05:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xprh-x7hf-54qr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-09 01:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xprh-x7hf-54qr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-08 21:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xprh-x7hf-54qr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-08 17:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-08 17:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xprh-x7hf-54qr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-08 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 29% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-08 14:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xprh-x7hf-54qr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-08 10:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xprh-x7hf-54qr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-08 06:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xprh-x7hf-54qr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-08 02:48 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-08 02:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xprh-x7hf-54qr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-07 23:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 29% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xprh-x7hf-54qr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-07 19:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xprh-x7hf-54qr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-07 15:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xprh-x7hf-54qr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-07 11:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xprh-x7hf-54qr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-07 08:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xprh-x7hf-54qr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-07 04:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xprh-x7hf-54qr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-07 00:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xprh-x7hf-54qr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-06 20:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xprh-x7hf-54qr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-06 16:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-06 16:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xprh-x7hf-54qr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-06 15:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 29% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-06 13:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xprh-x7hf-54qr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-06 09:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xprh-x7hf-54qr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-06 05:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xprh-x7hf-54qr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-06 01:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xprh-x7hf-54qr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-05 22:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xprh-x7hf-54qr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-05 18:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-05 18:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xprh-x7hf-54qr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-05 17:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 29% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-05 14:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xprh-x7hf-54qr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
- 2026-10-05 10:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xprh-x7hf-54qr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
Publicly available exploits
(2 references)Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 Metasploit module, 1 Exploit-DB entry). No release with the fix is confirmed, so defenders should restrict or isolate affected systems accordingly until one is applied.
- Metasploitexploit/windows/local/ms10_015_kitrap0d✓ verifiedPublished Nov 14, 2013
Windows SYSTEM Escalation via KiTrap0D
Open source ↗ - Exploit-DBEDB-11199✓ verifiedPublished Jan 19, 2010
Microsoft Windows NT/2000/2003/2008/XP/Vista/7 - 'KiTrap0D' User Mode to Ring Escalation (MS10-015)
Open source ↗
Frequently asked(6)
What is CVE-2010-0232?
When was CVE-2010-0232 made public?
Is CVE-2010-0232 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2010-0232?
Which products are affected by CVE-2010-0232?
How do I remediate CVE-2010-0232?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2010-0232
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2010-0232?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.