Apache Axis2, as used in dswsbobje.war in SAP BusinessObjects Enterprise XI 3.2, CA ARCserve D2D r15, and other products, has a default password of axis2 for the admin account, which makes it easier for remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by uploading a crafted web service.
CVE-2010-0219
“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS v2 base score.
This CVE was only ever scored under CVSS v2.0. NVD CVSS v2.0 base 10.0 — NVD rates that HIGH (NVD's v2 bands: LOW 0.0–3.9 / MEDIUM 4.0–6.9 / HIGH 7.0–10.0; no CRITICAL band). Vector AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C. CVSS v2 is an older, coarser metric than v3.1/v4.0 (no Scope, no User Interaction, no Attack Requirements), so it is not directly comparable to a v3 or v4 score. NVD has never re-scored this record under v3. EPSS predicts 91% exploitation probability in the next 30 days; it does not lift the v2 base. EPSS sets EG Risk's exploitation input. Confidence: LOW.
Also known asEUVD-2010-0250 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-9x38-862g-jg8w (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- High exploitation likelihood — EPSS 91%
- Public exploit code is available (Metasploit, Exploit-DB, marked verified by Exploit-DB, other public proof-of-concept code)
A fix is referenced (a reference tagged "Patch", often a source commit), but no release containing it is confirmed — find the release that contains it; until it is applied, mitigate (WAF / firewall / segmentation).
- CVSS v2.0 (legacy)
- 10.0HIGHNVD never assigned a CVSS v3 rating to this CVE
- EG Score
- 10.0HIGHlow confidence
- EG Risk
- 81EG Risk 81/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity100% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 10.0 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation91% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.Exploitation public PoC (exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is referenced, but no release containing it is confirmed. Check the referenced fix and the vendor's advisory for a release that contains it and apply that within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high; until then, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation. - EPSS PROB
- 91%
- EPSS %ILE
- 99th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (10.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 10.0 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 10.0 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.NVD CVSS v2.0 · CVSS v2.0AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
- EG Likelihood
- 91% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-25). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track* at medium mission impactTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
A fix is referenced, but no release containing it is confirmed. Check the referenced fix and the vendor's advisory for a release that contains it and apply that within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high; until then, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation.
Exploitation public PoC (exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
October 18, 2010
Last Modified
April 29, 2026
References (14)
- cret@cert · CVE Programhttp://retrogod.altervista.org/9sg_ca_d2d.html
- cret@cert · CVE Programhttp://secunia.com/advisories/41799 (archived copy: the site no longer serves it)Third-party advisory (tagged Vendor Advisory by NVD)
- cret@cert · CVE Programhttp://secunia.com/advisories/42763 (archived copy: the site no longer serves it)
- cret@cert · CVE Programhttp://spl0it.org/files/talks/source_barcelona10/Hacking%20SAP%20BusinessObjects.pdfExploit
- cret@cert · CVE Programhttp://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/15869
- cret@cert · CVE Programhttp://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/989719US Government Resource
- cret@cert · CVE Programhttp://www.osvdb.org/70233 (archived copy: the site no longer serves it)
- cret@cert · CVE Programhttp://www.rapid7.com/security-center/advisories/R7-0037.jspExploit
- cret@cert · CVE Programhttp://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/514284/100/0/threaded (archived copy: the site no longer serves it)
- cret@cert · CVE Programhttp://www.securitytracker.com/id?1024929
- cret@cert · CVE Programhttp://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/2673Third-party advisory (tagged Vendor Advisory by NVD)
- cret@cert · CVE Programhttps://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/62523
- cret@cert · CVE Programhttps://kb.juniper.net/KB27373
- cret@cert · CVE Programhttps://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1432881Patch
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 4× in last 7d / 12× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 14 repeat rows among the latest 89 are merged into the row they repeat.
- 2026-10-25 20:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 91% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-21 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 91% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-19 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 91% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-18 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 91% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-18 11:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-14 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 91% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-13 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 91% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-12 21:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 01:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-07 23:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 91% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-29 08:03 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-24 13:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 91% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-20 20:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 91% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-16 13:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 91% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-12 14:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-10 09:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-05 15:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-04 13:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-28 21:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-19 16:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-18 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-07 16:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-30 01:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
Show 50 moreShow fewer
- 2026-07-26 13:39 UTCEG score recomputeAssessed again: 10.0 HIGH
- 2026-07-25 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-23 01:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9x38-862g-jg8w · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-07-23 01:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9x38-862g-jg8w · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-07-23 01:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9x38-862g-jg8w · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-07-23 01:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9x38-862g-jg8w · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-07-23 01:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9x38-862g-jg8w · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-07-23 01:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9x38-862g-jg8w · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-07-23 01:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9x38-862g-jg8w · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-07-23 00:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9x38-862g-jg8w · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-07-23 00:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9x38-862g-jg8w · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-07-23 00:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9x38-862g-jg8w · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-07-23 00:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9x38-862g-jg8w · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-07-23 00:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9x38-862g-jg8w · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-07-23 00:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9x38-862g-jg8w · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-07-23 00:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9x38-862g-jg8w · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-07-23 00:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9x38-862g-jg8w · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-07-23 00:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9x38-862g-jg8w · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-07-23 00:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9x38-862g-jg8w · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-07-23 00:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9x38-862g-jg8w · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-07-23 00:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9x38-862g-jg8w · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-07-23 00:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9x38-862g-jg8w · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-07-23 00:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9x38-862g-jg8w · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-07-23 00:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9x38-862g-jg8w · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-07-23 00:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9x38-862g-jg8w · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-07-23 00:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9x38-862g-jg8w · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-07-23 00:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-23 00:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9x38-862g-jg8w · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-07-23 00:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9x38-862g-jg8w · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-07-23 00:38 UTCEG score recompute▼ 9.00
- 2026-07-23 00:05 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 21:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 14:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-20 17:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-01 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-28 04:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-23 21:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-17 17:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-15 17:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-13 22:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 93% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-12 23:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 93% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-05 22:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 93% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-01 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 93% · 99th percentile
- 2026-05-29 10:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-05-29 10:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9x38-862g-jg8w · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-05-26 13:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 93% · 99th percentile
- 2026-05-22 21:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 93% · 99th percentile
- 2026-05-21 22:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 93% · 99th percentile
- 2026-05-18 21:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 93% · 99th percentile
Publicly available exploits
(8 references)Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (2 Metasploit modules, 3 Exploit-DB entries, 2 GitHub PoCs), as is 1 Nuclei detection template. A detection template checks whether a system is affected; it is not necessarily exploit code. No release with the fix is confirmed, so defenders should restrict or isolate affected systems accordingly until one is applied.
- Exploit-DBEDB-15869✓ verifiedPublished Dec 30, 2010
CA ARCserve D2D r15 - Web Service Servlet Code Execution
Open source ↗ - Exploit-DBEDB-16312✓ verifiedPublished Dec 14, 2010
Axis2 - (Authenticated) Code Execution (via REST) (Metasploit)
Open source ↗ - Exploit-DBEDB-16315✓ verifiedPublished Dec 14, 2010
Axis2 / SAP BusinessObjects - (Authenticated) Code Execution (via SOAP) (Metasploit)
Open source ↗ - Metasploitexploit/multi/http/axis2_deployer✓ verifiedPublished Nov 15, 2010
Axis2 / SAP BusinessObjects Authenticated Code Execution (via SOAP)
Open source ↗ - Metasploitauxiliary/scanner/http/axis_login✓ verifiedPublished Jun 10, 2010
Apache Axis2 Brute Force Utility
Open source ↗ - Open source ↗GitHub PoCveritas-rt/CVE-2010-0219Published Jul 28, 2024
- Open source ↗GitHub PoCvvts-alpha/CVE-2010-0219Published Jul 28, 2024
- Nucleihttp/cves/2010/CVE-2010-0219.yamlPublished Mar 3, 2022
Apache Axis2 Default Login
Open source ↗
Frequently asked(4)
What is CVE-2010-0219?
When was CVE-2010-0219 made public?
Is CVE-2010-0219 actively exploited?
How do I remediate CVE-2010-0219?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2010-0219
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2010-0219?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.