CVE-2009-3743

HIGHCVSS v2 · 9.39.3—
EchelonGraph scoreLOW confidence

This CVE was only ever scored under CVSS v2.0. NVD CVSS v2.0 base 9.3 — v2 rates that HIGH (v2 bands: LOW 0.0–3.9 / MEDIUM 4.0–6.9 / HIGH 7.0–10.0; v2 has no CRITICAL band). Vector AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C. CVSS v2 is an older, coarser metric than v3.1/v4.0 (no Scope, no User Interaction, no Attack Requirements), so it is not directly comparable to a v3 or v4 score. NVD has never re-scored this record under v3. EPSS predicts 6.8% exploitation probability in the next 30 days, which is reflected in EG Risk but does not lift the v2 base. Confidence: LOW.

Sources: epss, nvd_v2
9.3EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 7%CVSS v2: 9.3Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

Off-by-one error in the Ins_MINDEX function in the TrueType bytecode interpreter in Ghostscript before 8.71 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (heap memory corruption) via a malformed TrueType font in a document that trigger an integer overflow and a heap-based buffer overflow.

CVSS v2.0 (legacy)
9.3HIGHNVD never assigned a CVSS v3 rating to this CVE
EG Score
9.3(low)
EG Risk
49(Track)
EG Risk 49/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity93% × 45%
Exploitation7% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
7%
EPSS %ILE
93%
KEV
Not listed

Published

August 26, 2010

Last Modified

April 29, 2026

References (12)

Patch Availability(2)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntulibgs8 (8.71.dfsg.2-0ubuntu7.1) @ maverick2026-05-29ubuntu
redhatghostscript-0:8.70-11.el6_2.62012-02-02redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
ghostscript—8.71~dfsg-1—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
ghostscript—8.71~dfsg-1—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
ghostscript—8.71~dfsg-1—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
ghostscript—8.71~dfsg-1—

All Vendor Advisories

(2)

Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 3× in last 7d / 11× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 114 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-08-27 14:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-25 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-08-24 19:02 UTCOSV refresh
  4. 2026-08-19 16:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-15 01:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-08 16:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-08 12:19 UTCOSV refresh
  8. 2026-08-06 13:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-08-03 10:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-30 16:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-30 01:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-26 13:39 UTCEG score recompute▲ 9.30
  13. 2026-07-25 14:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-24 14:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-23 14:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-23 04:49 UTCOSV refresh
  17. 2026-07-23 01:00 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-07-23 00:37 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-07-23 00:04 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-07-22 21:43 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-07-22 14:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-21 15:20 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-20 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-20 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-18 09:59 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-07-16 16:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-15 16:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-15 16:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-15 01:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-13 22:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-13 06:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-11 08:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-11 08:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-09 19:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-08 15:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-06 16:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-06 02:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-06 02:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-05 23:59 UTCOSV refresh
  15. 2026-07-05 02:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-05 02:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-04 06:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-01 15:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-30 23:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-28 04:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-28 04:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-27 03:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-25 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-25 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-23 21:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-23 21:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-22 14:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-22 14:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-21 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-19 19:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-19 19:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-18 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-18 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-17 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-17 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-17 11:13 UTCOSV refresh
  39. 2026-06-16 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-16 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-15 17:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-14 23:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-14 23:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-13 22:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-12 23:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-12 23:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-10 22:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-10 13:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-08 14:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-07 15:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-07 15:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-06 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-06 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-06 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-05 22:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-05 22:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-06-05 06:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-06-04 13:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-06-04 13:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-06-02 20:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-06-02 20:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-06-01 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-06-01 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-05-31 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-05-31 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-05-31 00:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-05-31 00:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-05-29 13:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-05-29 10:31 UTCEG score recompute
  70. 2026-05-29 10:31 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-05-29 10:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  72. 2026-05-28 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-05-28 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-05-28 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-05-27 13:38 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2009-3743?
CVE-2009-3743 is a high vulnerability published on August 26, 2010. Off-by-one error in the Ins_MINDEX function in the TrueType bytecode interpreter in Ghostscript before 8.71 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (heap memory corruption) via a malformed TrueType font in a document that trigger an integer overflow and a…
When was CVE-2009-3743 disclosed?
CVE-2009-3743 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on August 26, 2010, with the most recent update on April 29, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2009-3743 actively exploited?
CVE-2009-3743 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 7% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 6.5% of all scored CVEs.
How do I remediate CVE-2009-3743?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2009-3743, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2009-3743

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2009-3743?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.

Start Free Scan →Browse All CVEs